- 21,392
- 2,986
Do they distort space and time?The Prince of Counters said:All I see are false comparisons. Teach actually has pretty realistic black holes, Stings light isn't even light so thats one of the many things wrong with that argument.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do they distort space and time?The Prince of Counters said:All I see are false comparisons. Teach actually has pretty realistic black holes, Stings light isn't even light so thats one of the many things wrong with that argument.
It isn't a False Equivalency lol, not when neither of them are accepted as being real.The Prince of Counters said:His Black holes suck in everything, sucks in light, compresses and if we use his statement of it being able to produce infinite gravity then yeah, they'd be legit. It still has a lot more proof of it being more like a black hole than Stings White Magic being Light by a long shot. False Equivalency on your part.
"And yes, that's quite literally how outliers work."The Prince of Counters said:Yes but you don't seem to quite understand that the verse we're talking about here is Fairy Tail, not a super verse like Masada or even Dragon ball. Even then they have mutiple feats and statements to support their tier. Here we're discussing the fact that FT gaining a tier 5 feat would be outrageous due to having no feats even near that level. Also could you please drop it with the false Equivalencies? It's rather annoying to see you brining up silly arguments such as verses going from low 2-C - High 1-C whenever most of said verses do an excellent job at setting up the power scaling system. Fairy Tail on the other hand isn't. And yes, that's quite literally how outliers work. Being a god tier in a verse that has no feats on that level and that isn't in a set higher D setting then yeah, it's certainly an outlier.
Then it isn't a false comparison. The comparison was that they both weren't real. I wasn't trying to make a 1:1 ratio of how many of the standards for black hole and real light they missed.The Prince of Counters said:You countered by comparing Teach's stuff to Stings stuff. Sting doesn't even use light and is objectively more incorrect than Teachs stuff. Both are wrong yes but one of them meets more than a few of the criteria while the other doesn't even meet one.
The Prince of Counters said:Anyway I'm not gonna sit here and waste my time arguing with an advent Fairy Tail supporter over a hypothetical feat that isn't even legit to begin with. Seen enough for one night.