• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Downgrading Killer Peter once again and debunking some calcs

I don't get what you are trying to say?

Both will use a timeframe of 0.1s

Yuna debatably have 0.08s or even D-rank brothers could use that timeframe but we are using 0.1s as somewhat of a safe end.
Doesn't really change the calculation regardless of which observer we are using.

What are you trying to say? Going by your words then are you perhaps trying to invalidate the supersonic calc?
No I'm not trying t invalidate the supersonic feat I think were talking pat each other my disagreement has been with the CRT reasoning, not nesessarily the existence of the supersonic result. If the calc intentionally uses 0.1 as a conservative lower bund and that states as a lowball rather the characters actual perception speed then I don't have an issue with that approach.

But what I was objecting to was the claim that Yuna's statement cannot be used because following movement and perceiving movement are different things, yeah they are different but that alone doesn't invalidate the calc the calc doesn't require Yuna to be completely perception blitzed it only requires that the sequence exceeed her ability to contonuously resolve and follow each movement which is exactly what the scene conveys. If the Doko brothers are used instead as the observer while still applying a deliberatleu conservative 0.1 timeframe then that's actually an even safer interpretation then relying only on Yuna.
 
Back
Top