- 102
- 63
In The Yin Tian Shen Yin force's page, a Nonduality type 3 is given by this argumentation :
The only interpretation i can Give to that for a many-valued logic system is that "Ambiguity" would be an additional logic system, but without more context, it is impossible to define the meaning of "Ambiguity" here, since it talks about existence dans non-existence, imo "Ambiguity" mean a thing like a "fusion" of existence and Non-existence (Would be 0 and 1 like a nonexistent-physiology Type 3).
Here a little Reminder of the 4 "basic"logical states :
With the interpretation i gave to "Ambiguity", the logical state show here would be "A and Not A", which is included in the 4 "basic" logical states.
Quoting the Nonduality page :
So the problem I see with the argumentation is that there if no thing like 5 logical states but Just Existence (A), Non-Existence (Not A), and Ambiguity (A and Not A). And my thought are that the Nonduality type 3 should be downgrade to Nonduality type 2 (Just like before if I renember).
Agree : Georredannea15, Unqver, RaveeCPN
Disagree : ActuallySpaceMan42, BestMGQScalerEver
Neutral :
Other : Fixxed (Think that it is not nonduality)
- Nonduality (Type 3; Beings that have the Aspect of Absolution, have become Initial Flames formed from countless bits of information of both 'Existence', 'Non-Existence', and 'Ambiguity'. They can't be affected by any kind of complex or volatile skill, including ones that are illusory or spiritual, because they have transcended all boundaries. As such, even attacks that make every aspect and principle of the universe equal, parallel, symmetrical, balanced, stable, complementing, nullifying, and corresponding, ridding it of change and possibility, are unable to truly affect them)
The only interpretation i can Give to that for a many-valued logic system is that "Ambiguity" would be an additional logic system, but without more context, it is impossible to define the meaning of "Ambiguity" here, since it talks about existence dans non-existence, imo "Ambiguity" mean a thing like a "fusion" of existence and Non-existence (Would be 0 and 1 like a nonexistent-physiology Type 3).
Here a little Reminder of the 4 "basic"logical states :
- A
- Not A
- Neither A and Not A
- A and Not A
With the interpretation i gave to "Ambiguity", the logical state show here would be "A and Not A", which is included in the 4 "basic" logical states.
Quoting the Nonduality page :
Plurality: Characters existing in a nondual state regarding all dual systems within an entire level of reality in a way that makes them exist beyond the classical states of contradiction-allowing logic, instead operating on a many-valued logic system with at least five truth values.
So the problem I see with the argumentation is that there if no thing like 5 logical states but Just Existence (A), Non-Existence (Not A), and Ambiguity (A and Not A). And my thought are that the Nonduality type 3 should be downgrade to Nonduality type 2 (Just like before if I renember).
Agree : Georredannea15, Unqver, RaveeCPN
Disagree : ActuallySpaceMan42, BestMGQScalerEver
Neutral :
Other : Fixxed (Think that it is not nonduality)
Last edited: