- 13
- 1
!!!RANTING IN PROCESS!!! I seriously need to point this out because this has been infuriating me for months, maybe more. Considering that this topic will be locked, possibly deleted, I just had to get this out of my system once and for all. So please, excuse me, if I come off a bit frustrated. I do not want to debate (as I have had stopped debating 6-7 months ago) but FFS, please do something about this!
====================
Stats for Ra: .... "Attack Potency: Universe level+ through powerscaling (Should be more powerful than Heh, embodiment of infinity , grandfather of Nu)"
Stats for Asriel (Undertale verse) ... "Attack Potency: Multiverse level ( Dwarfs Photoshop Flowey in power by an infinite amount, who was able to effortlessly create and destroy numerous timelines in his fight against Frisk) | At least Multiverse level (Superior to his previous self by an immense amount, though the exact degree is unknown)"
I already had someone, who I know, telling me, I quote:
"You don't understanding the reason why it's like that
Asriel's stats are confirmed to be Infinite. In a verse where characters like Chara and Omega Flowey can already destroy countless timelines. Infinitely above Multiversal is Multiversal+
Now the reason Ra isn't that strong is because Egyptian Mythology as far as I'm aware lacks a Multiverse and beings who can effectively destroy it. But anyways Ra being infinity itself likely applies to the 4th Dimensional scale given Ra is well everything "
If you are going to use the same argument that the Egyptian Mythology never had a Multiverse, you have to consider this:
1.) It doesn't matter if the Egyptian Mythology has a Multiverse or not. That's downplay. Let me explain why.
Because I'm pretty sure that the Ancient Egyptian never even thought of the possibility of multiple universes and timelines, literally. The concept of Multiverse was created in 1702, where Issac Newton suggested the idea of Multiverse (the earliest), not 3100 BC in Ancient Egypt. So you cannot say that, oh, Asriel is above Ra because UT verse has a Multiverse and the Egyptian Mythology doesn't have a Multiverse.
2.) The Egyptian Mythology has at least 2 Universes (one being the Living Universe and the Underworld), which yes, I know, is very far way from the needed 1000 universes to be considered a Multiverse but still.
3.) My main problem is that you, yourself, stated that Ra is supposed to be above someone who is the embodiment of infinity, and yet, is only Universal+ level? If your argument is that Heh has shown to have only Universal+ level of feat, I'm sorry, but you completely missed the point. Do you think that I will take you seriously (like that guy I quoted earlier) that Ra is bellow Asriel (who is supposed to be infinite) when he is already above someone who is the embodiment of infinity, the physical form of infinity, his own verse? What????
====================
Stats for Ra: .... "Attack Potency: Universe level+ through powerscaling (Should be more powerful than Heh, embodiment of infinity , grandfather of Nu)"
Stats for Asriel (Undertale verse) ... "Attack Potency: Multiverse level ( Dwarfs Photoshop Flowey in power by an infinite amount, who was able to effortlessly create and destroy numerous timelines in his fight against Frisk) | At least Multiverse level (Superior to his previous self by an immense amount, though the exact degree is unknown)"
I already had someone, who I know, telling me, I quote:
"You don't understanding the reason why it's like that
Asriel's stats are confirmed to be Infinite. In a verse where characters like Chara and Omega Flowey can already destroy countless timelines. Infinitely above Multiversal is Multiversal+
Now the reason Ra isn't that strong is because Egyptian Mythology as far as I'm aware lacks a Multiverse and beings who can effectively destroy it. But anyways Ra being infinity itself likely applies to the 4th Dimensional scale given Ra is well everything "
If you are going to use the same argument that the Egyptian Mythology never had a Multiverse, you have to consider this:
1.) It doesn't matter if the Egyptian Mythology has a Multiverse or not. That's downplay. Let me explain why.
Because I'm pretty sure that the Ancient Egyptian never even thought of the possibility of multiple universes and timelines, literally. The concept of Multiverse was created in 1702, where Issac Newton suggested the idea of Multiverse (the earliest), not 3100 BC in Ancient Egypt. So you cannot say that, oh, Asriel is above Ra because UT verse has a Multiverse and the Egyptian Mythology doesn't have a Multiverse.
2.) The Egyptian Mythology has at least 2 Universes (one being the Living Universe and the Underworld), which yes, I know, is very far way from the needed 1000 universes to be considered a Multiverse but still.
3.) My main problem is that you, yourself, stated that Ra is supposed to be above someone who is the embodiment of infinity, and yet, is only Universal+ level? If your argument is that Heh has shown to have only Universal+ level of feat, I'm sorry, but you completely missed the point. Do you think that I will take you seriously (like that guy I quoted earlier) that Ra is bellow Asriel (who is supposed to be infinite) when he is already above someone who is the embodiment of infinity, the physical form of infinity, his own verse? What????
