- 94
- 14
basically bringing up the points in this blog:
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:WeeklyBattles/DotA_2_Calcs
"Here's my thoughts looking back on these:
The yield here for Alchemist should be debunked since the actual mountain was never seen and the size value used should've never been used since the mountain size for the one he blew up in lore is not under the umbrella statement for a mountain size like Earthshaker's is. And on top of that, Earthshaker himself should probably only get the value for the 1 mountain scaled. Multiplying by two here isn't really accurate since the smaller mountain located to the right of the original mountain that was scaled is smaller. Scaling the volume for the smaller mountain and adding that volume to the original mountain would be more accurate.
For Io's Overcharge, the feat is prolly bunk the way I did it since he's not representing the gravitational force since he's not Enigma, likely using mass-energy conversion for that feat would be more accurate since he's supplying the nucelear binding energy for all matter. And on top of that the assuming their universe is the same regarding the amount of planets is pretty dubious since its cosmology formation is not like ours.
"A benevolent, cooperative force, Io bonds its strange magnetism to others so that the power of allies might be enhanced."
Plus the amount of matter of worlds / material planes that Io holds together would be an infinite amount according to Oracle's backstory of infinite timelines."
tldr version:
Basically downgrading Earthshaker slightly, Alchemist gets his feat left to unknown tier for the time being, Io's overcharge feat should not take into account GBE. Very likely mass-energy if he is supplying the binding energy of matter with electromagnetism. But the amount of matter he is responsible for should at least be universal in scope, if not multiversal in scope since he exists within Oracle's material dimension, one that was shattered into an infinite amount due to timeline shenanigins.
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:WeeklyBattles/DotA_2_Calcs
"Here's my thoughts looking back on these:
The yield here for Alchemist should be debunked since the actual mountain was never seen and the size value used should've never been used since the mountain size for the one he blew up in lore is not under the umbrella statement for a mountain size like Earthshaker's is. And on top of that, Earthshaker himself should probably only get the value for the 1 mountain scaled. Multiplying by two here isn't really accurate since the smaller mountain located to the right of the original mountain that was scaled is smaller. Scaling the volume for the smaller mountain and adding that volume to the original mountain would be more accurate.
For Io's Overcharge, the feat is prolly bunk the way I did it since he's not representing the gravitational force since he's not Enigma, likely using mass-energy conversion for that feat would be more accurate since he's supplying the nucelear binding energy for all matter. And on top of that the assuming their universe is the same regarding the amount of planets is pretty dubious since its cosmology formation is not like ours.
"A benevolent, cooperative force, Io bonds its strange magnetism to others so that the power of allies might be enhanced."
Plus the amount of matter of worlds / material planes that Io holds together would be an infinite amount according to Oracle's backstory of infinite timelines."
tldr version:
Basically downgrading Earthshaker slightly, Alchemist gets his feat left to unknown tier for the time being, Io's overcharge feat should not take into account GBE. Very likely mass-energy if he is supplying the binding energy of matter with electromagnetism. But the amount of matter he is responsible for should at least be universal in scope, if not multiversal in scope since he exists within Oracle's material dimension, one that was shattered into an infinite amount due to timeline shenanigins.
