DnD High Godly Regen/Resurection

[Qawsedf234]

sufficiently high level magics are High-Godly in their healing capacity given that the feat of High-Godly itself still exists

I guess with rituals a High Godly resurrection is possible

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

Funny enough, while the gods maybe won't benefit from this, the Tarrasque might fit.

As a consuming effect in 3.5, Unname would trigger the Tarrasque's regeneration if wish is not used to keep it gone. Though that might trespass into game mechanics (since by sheer lore, Unname should be permanent if you don't do the renaming ritual).

 

[Mr. Bambu]

A "possibly" may suffice there. I think with something like Unname, working within these lines works best.

 

[deonment]

I would like to say that if the issue here is the fact that there are no direct instances of gods coming back from truenaming or the like, I would like to mention that (although it isn't on the profile anymore after I brought it up to Bambu, but given the precedent of Fusion Zamasu I think it still holds water) Asmodeus as Ahriman used to have high godly from coming back from the complete destruction of 4D space (which I do not exactly know the origin of, so if someone could provide it so I don't look like I'm speaking out of my ass here or am missing some context the scan itself would provide), which could be used for two different arguments for high godly.

1)If the feat in question means 4D space as 3D space + Time, which would be regen from history as the entire timeline was destroyed and logically coming back from that would be the aforementioned regen from all of history being nuked.
2)Would be the fact that as an abstract, having the reality in which your concept resides being nuked would be high godly as well, specifically from concept erasure.

Now while Asmodeus as Ahriman is an outlier when it comes to the power of "divine" figures, if the above is true, it would show that those on the divine level do in fact have the capacity to come back from some degree of fundamental erasure, which would indicate that coming back from unnaming is less out-there.

 

[Eseseso]

I would like to say that if the issue here is the fact that there are no direct instances of gods coming back from truenaming or the like, I would like to mention that (although it isn't on the profile anymore after I brought it up to Bambu, but given the precedent of Fusion Zamasu I think it still holds water) Asmodeus as Ahriman used to have high godly from coming back from the complete destruction of 4D space (which I do not exactly know the origin of, so if someone could provide it so I don't look like I'm speaking out of my ass here or am missing some context the scan itself would provide), which could be used for two different arguments for high godly.

1)If the feat in question means 4D space as 3D space + Time, which would be regen from history as the entire timeline was destroyed and logically coming back from that would be the aforementioned regen from all of history being nuked.
2)Would be the fact that as an abstract, having the reality in which your concept resides being nuked would be high godly as well, specifically from concept erasure.

Now while Asmodeus as Ahriman is an outlier when it comes to the power of "divine" figures, if the above is true, it would show that those on the divine level do in fact have the capacity to come back from some degree of fundamental erasure, which would indicate that coming back from unnaming is less out-there.

I mean we do give Fusion Zamasu from DBH High Godly since he survived his timeline being erased

 

[Nierre]

Qaws makes sense to me

 

[Qawsedf234]

Asmodeus as Ahriman used to have high godly from coming back from the complete destruction of 4D space (which I do not exactly know the origin of, so if someone could provide it so I don't look like I'm speaking out of my ass here or am missing some context the scan itself would provide)

It's in the durability section

 

[deonment]

It's in the durability section

Huh, probably doesn't work then because it doesn't seem like a regen feat, though while I still think high-godly would be legitimate for the unname stuff, this can't be used as supporting evidence