- 1
- 0
It's easy to find out why I say this. Just search up "Dimensional Tiering is wrong" then go to a reddit post, and you'll find out why it's wrong. I think it should be changed.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dimensional Tiering is wrong and should be changed
- Thread starter ExodusRulez
- Start date
- Status
- 64,034
- 16,081
Best argument
- 33,408
- 8,432
That's nice.
- 24,177
- 3,892
...Don't use other people's opinions as arguments.
- 18,196
- 19,625
Do you mean this one? The first line of it is wrong, we don't exist in 10 to 26 dimensions. Gravity decays with the cube of distance, if space had 10 dimensions it would decay with the 10th power of distance.
It also shows a complete lack of understanding for infinities and uncountable infinities.
I don't see the tiering system being changed because of this.
It also shows a complete lack of understanding for infinities and uncountable infinities.
I don't see the tiering system being changed because of this.
SomebodyData
Waiting for Walpurgisnacht Rising and Metroid 6...
VS Battles
Administrator
Human Resources
- 14,734
- 4,054
>4D beings composed of infinite 3D objects
> Electrons are 0D
Never knew that
> Electrons are 0D
Never knew that
- 19,139
- 6,352
"Let's return to our own puny reality with its mere three dimensions, shall we? In fact, return to the most basic objects. Elementary particles. Let's look at the electron. A mere 0-dimensional point."
So, quarks must be -1 dimensional because they are smaller than electrons I suppose
So, quarks must be -1 dimensional because they are smaller than electrons I suppose
- 24,177
- 3,892
>Electrons are 0D
What?
What?
- 24,177
- 3,892
I learned about higher dimensions from watching Nova as a kid
SomebodyData
Waiting for Walpurgisnacht Rising and Metroid 6...
VS Battles
Administrator
Human Resources
- 14,734
- 4,054
The worst part is that people actually believe him lmao
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
