Dilbert Explanation.

[EMagoIorSouI]

With Dilbert's device that links the Earth to the moon, shouldn't he be 5-B for a causing a planetary wide disaster? In this sense, he froze the entire planet just by linking a moon/planetary sized bridge to another large substance.

Besides, if has a device similar to this on in particular, than he should be able to have other devices that should be planetary as well.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

I agree with this upgrade

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

The fact it's explicity stated the earth's orbit will be affected means it translates to kinetic force

 

[Amelia_Lonelyheart]

Causing planet wide disasters is not destroying a planet.

All the tool does is move the Moon. Anything else is side effects that he didn't cause.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

Connects the moon. To the earth. Why is that unknown? Isn't at at least 5-C?

 

[EMagoIorSouI]

Well, if he's able to move the moon, shouldn't that make him 5-C? If he's able to move giant planetary substances than it should pinpoint that tier.

 

[Amelia_Lonelyheart]

I already agreed to At least 5-C. I have no idea why it was changed.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

So, we should wait for Ant to respond, right?

 

[Antvasima]

Well, I personally prefer to have such feats calculated, rather than using guesswork, but I am not invested in the issue.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

Well, it's never specified the exact distance it was moved.

 

[EMagoIorSouI]

The ice age would be caused if the moon was moved like that, no?

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

I think so how much would the moon need to be moved to do so?

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

Also shouldn't dilbert be under the cartoon characters category? There was a dilbert cartoon

 

[Antvasima]

I suppose that should be fine.