Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeaa, a less than x2 difference is hardly immense. This is why we state AP values before saying "muh AP advantage."TacticalNuke002 said:All the Zelda votes should be removed since they are based upon an "immense" AP difference which doesn't exist.
Not all of them though, some of them base upon "Link just erases KC and Diavolo", which I think is BS since Diavolo is the type to use Time Erase on any attack. Even if it's the boomerang or a bomb.TacticalNuke002 said:All the Zelda votes should be removed since they are based upon an "immense" AP difference which doesn't exist.
Grace doesn't just end like that when the votes are debunked. I also see that you added the results. What kind of bs is this?GiverOfThePeace said:Well you guys can make a redux thread if you want, grace passed.
The votes weren't debunked, you literally supplied the same arguments that were already refuted. Make a redux, this thread is concluded.TacticalNuke002 said:Grace doesn't just end like that when the votes are debunked. I also see that you added the results. What kind of bs is this?GiverOfThePeace said:Well you guys can make a redux thread if you want, grace passed.
I have reported this to the Versus Thread Removal Thread
TacticalNuke002 said:SoViewtiful and Shikieiki Yamaxandu voted for AP difference. Remove these votes and you don't have an addable match. The rest have also factored in the AP advantage into their votes and idk ignored that Diavolo can avoid Link's stuff with time erase and precog.
If anyone is dishonest, its GiverOfThePeace who said that Link has an immense AP advantage towards the beginning of the match which influenced public opinion.
Also, the only salt right now is the sweat dripping down your foreheads.
Not voting, but give more elaboration to something is nothing but admirable. This looks rather suspicious.GiverOfThePeace said:Why are you guys voting in a thread that's already done
Can you reword that? I legit don't understand what you're trying to say.Eficiente said:Not voting, but give more elaboration to something is nothing but admirable. This looks rather suspicious.