• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Deoxys Meteor discussion pt. 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Which calc group members have commented in the discussion or the blogs previously?
 
Which calc group members have commented in the discussion or the blogs previously?
I contacted just Ugarik, since he's the one who pointed out the issue first, but there's also DemonMitch who commented there
 
Method 1 doesn't need the curvature formula as the entire planet is visible. Curvature formula is only necessary when only a small part of the planet is visible. Just noting it down.
 
@StrymULTRA

You need to post the calculation methods in a blog post, so the calc group members can comment there. That is our standard procedure. Otherwise nothing that we decide here will be binding.
 
In any case I'd suggest going with Method 2. Method 1's wack.
 
@StrymULTRA

You need to post the calculation methods in a blog post, so the calc group members can comment there. That is our standard procedure. Otherwise nothing that we decide here will be binding.
  1. DemonGodMitch already told that high end of Method 2 is fine
  2. Done
EDIT: Nvm, DemonGod already commented there
 
Last edited:
Thank you. That can probably be used then, but I would prefer input from @Damage3245 and @Ugarik first.
 
Damage replied on the blog that the calc is mathematically fine and that it will depend upon which end the knowledgeable members want to go with for proper scaling, so basically this thread has been concluded as this thread is only for the calc aspect of the feat, not the scaling aspect.

The scaling aspect of the feat, and the end that will be chosen, is being discussed here.
 
Okay. Thank you. Should I close this thread then?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top