- 276
- 108
Whats the meaning of terms such as "plane of reality", "layer", or "level of existence" on this wiki.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Definition of terms
- Thread starter SubaruN2000
- Start date
- 3,057
- 1,299
one realm completely surpassing another to the point that the higher realm veiws any lower realms as fiction, non-existant, completely inconsequential, and beings from the lower realms cannot affect beings from the higher realm in any way at all
another example, a 2-D plane has length and height but no volume, if a 2-D object, lets say a square, were to exist inside of a 3-D structure, it would be infinitely thin, because it does not have volume, so what if you put another 2-D square on top of the first one, its still infinitely thin, the 2nd square made no difference from the perspective of the 3-D structure, because 0 + 0 is still 0, so what if you stacked infinite 2-D squares, its still infinitely thin, to any 3-D beings observing this square there is no difference between one square and infinite squares stacked on top of each other, because 0 times infinite is still 0, youd need to stack an uncountably infinite number of 2-D squares to start to give the stack volume visible to 3-D creatures, therefore 3-D objects are inherently superior to 2-D objects to the point that even an infinitely large 2-D object is completely inconsequential to 3-D beings
another example, a 2-D plane has length and height but no volume, if a 2-D object, lets say a square, were to exist inside of a 3-D structure, it would be infinitely thin, because it does not have volume, so what if you put another 2-D square on top of the first one, its still infinitely thin, the 2nd square made no difference from the perspective of the 3-D structure, because 0 + 0 is still 0, so what if you stacked infinite 2-D squares, its still infinitely thin, to any 3-D beings observing this square there is no difference between one square and infinite squares stacked on top of each other, because 0 times infinite is still 0, youd need to stack an uncountably infinite number of 2-D squares to start to give the stack volume visible to 3-D creatures, therefore 3-D objects are inherently superior to 2-D objects to the point that even an infinitely large 2-D object is completely inconsequential to 3-D beings
- 276
- 108
- Thread starter
- #3
Thanks! So all three of the terms I mentioned above just mean realms that are uncountably infinitely superior to lower ones. Or is there some distinct difference between something being a "plane of reality" and a "layer" or "level of existence"?
- 3,057
- 1,299
needs far more context than just being called something like that but, yeah, if its legit then the realm is uncountably infinitely above everything below it
- 276
- 108
- Thread starter
- #5
So a bigger realm that consists of infinite "planes of reality" that have higher ones viewing lower ones as some kind of fictional story or equivalent would be a High 1-B hierarchy, correct? And then viewing that larger realm containing all those planes as some story would be Low 1-A or 1-A depending on further context.
- 3,057
- 1,299
yeah if its legit thatd be high 1-B and either low 1-A if it just transcends the infinite hierarchy or 1-A if it completely transcends the concept of dimensions
