- 5,879
- 1,069
Prove that guy gardner's willpower was any less in that comic
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
DC Comics - Post-Crisis Superman Early Key Proposal
- Thread starter Firestorm808
- Start date
-
- Tags
- dc comics post-crisis superman
- Status
- 126
- 45
This thread aint ready, let alone you in view of your previous feeble posts.
Plus:
- 164,976
- 71,705
It seems like we have reached a consensus here in any case.
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #325
Okay, I'll have the draft updated to our agreements for tomorrow.
- 164,976
- 71,705
Thank you.
I unlocked the Superman page in question for you. Is that good, or should I re-lock it in the meantime?
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Superman_(Post-Crisis)
I unlocked the Superman page in question for you. Is that good, or should I re-lock it in the meantime?
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Superman_(Post-Crisis)
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #327
We should be fine.
- 32,737
- 37,876
You're on thin ice buddy, don't push it.
- 126
- 45
You are?
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #332
Dude, chill.
- 126
- 45
Don't mention @ me first when I'm not the one trying to escalate the discussion/thread into a heated one.
Tell this to the random Miniavengers jumping into a discussion he was not even part of initially. The discussion eneded well before he tried to carrying on for no reasons.
Reconsider your judgments on who to "blame".
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #334
I'm not blaming anybody. I'm just asking to put a stop to this spat.
- 126
- 45
Same thing.
Don't mention @ first and don't ask me anything then, as I haven't tried to carry on the discussion for no reasons.
Think twice before getting into something you are misjudging*, that's all I'm telling you.
- 797
- 557
Just going to lay out my personal view, but how is that 5-A durability feat even valid in the first place?
The mass of our sun is 1,98892000000000001e+38g, so the value in kilotons is 8.5444003e+39
Energy: 3.57497708552e+52 J or 357.49 MegaFoe - Solar System leve
The calc assumes the entire mass of the star was converted into anti matter as well as the planet, why is that the assumption ( which the OP of the calc doesn’t even establish himself) instead of the Sun exploding as soon as the antimatter planet touched it?
Anti matter reacting with matter is a mass energy conversion E=MC^2 of their combined masses.
The only way the calc works is if you assume that half of the suns mass was converted to antimatter, which the panels don’t imply because as soon as the antimatter planet touches the star in the very next panel we see an explosion.
For all we know the anti matter planet only resulted in a low end High 4-C explosion ( 10.8e 41 joules; 2x the mass-energy of earth ) reacting with an equivalent amount of matter when it touched the star.
The mass of our sun is 1,98892000000000001e+38g, so the value in kilotons is 8.5444003e+39
Energy: 3.57497708552e+52 J or 357.49 MegaFoe - Solar System leve
The calc assumes the entire mass of the star was converted into anti matter as well as the planet, why is that the assumption ( which the OP of the calc doesn’t even establish himself) instead of the Sun exploding as soon as the antimatter planet touched it?
Anti matter reacting with matter is a mass energy conversion E=MC^2 of their combined masses.
The only way the calc works is if you assume that half of the suns mass was converted to antimatter, which the panels don’t imply because as soon as the antimatter planet touches the star in the very next panel we see an explosion.
For all we know the anti matter planet only resulted in a low end High 4-C explosion ( 10.8e 41 joules; 2x the mass-energy of earth ) reacting with an equivalent amount of matter when it touched the star.
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #337
I also have concerns regarding that calc, but we can save that for a different thread.
- 15,277
- 15,438
That calc isn’t even where 5-A comes from, so it really doesn’t affect this thread.
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #339
The profile has been updated. Please look over to confirm changes.
- 5,879
- 1,069
What about the statement I listed above of him using an extra reserve of energy he never tapped into before when fighting Doomsday? It would be good to add it
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #341
To clarify, this is in an AP or Stamina context?
- 5,879
- 1,069
AP, its more evidence that he grows stronger and a better justification for the Varies rating
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #343
I'll make the addition.
- 5,879
- 1,069
I added references and scans for the Guy Gardner scaling and I think we need a Doomsday rework now
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #345
I agree. We can basically copy the Post-Absorption Tier from SM to Doomsday.
@Antvasima Can you help?
@Antvasima Can you help?
Last edited:
- 15,277
- 15,438
This should be in a note at the bottom of the page, not in his City level to Island level justification.
- 15,277
- 15,438
I’ve also noticed that Superman’s P&A formatting is now… incredibly gross to look at. I added scrollboxes to make it look somewhat better, but there’s a lot of issues that need to be edited.
- 15,563
- 11,853
And the formatting change was absolutely not discussed in the first place, this sort of stuff needs agreement and for the record, I absolutely disagree with it being applied to this profile, not to mention it was done improperly.
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #349
I initially converted the ability lists to bullets on my draft to make sorting and sourcing easier.
When the other staff looked through it during my sorting, they seemed fine with the bullets and suggested using the Inner Tabbers. From there, no one made any further remarks about it. See page 2 of thread.
If it's preferred to go back to the paragraph form, that's fine. All the sources and sorting are done.
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #350
Revised.
- 15,277
- 15,438
That’s part of the issue here, there’s a lot of powers and resistances that don’t have any scans or even justifications.
Also this is listed in his resistances for some reason
- Remove, unless we have scans he explicitly resisted the erasure effect not generic blasts.
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #352
I sourced the existing scans. Those that are just abilities without scans were already pre-existing, and I wasn't sure if the abilities clean-up should be done in a different thread.
Forgot about that note in the list. Revised.
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #353
@Antvasima Should abilities without scans be removed right now?
- 5,879
- 1,069
Why? Make another CRT for it
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #355
Just wanted to be sure since Tracer brought up the issue.
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #357
What are you talking about? You guys were looking this over this part of the draft during the sorting process. You guys even made formatting suggestions after I had to alphabetize the list when they got too muddled up.
If it needs to be changed, what is the standard order of abilities mean to be?
Almost all the scand have already been sourced and referenced. Some of them were unable to be determined.
- 9,266
- 3,251
Abilities should probably be bolded
- 6,914
- 6,631
- Thread starter
- #359
Alright, I backed up the current changes, and I reset the profile to when Ant first unlocked it.
Now, we need to re-settle all formatting issues.
Here is the current draft.
vsbattles.fandom.com
Now, we need to re-settle all formatting issues.
Here is the current draft.
DC Comics - Superman (Post-Crisis) Profile Draft
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 32,737
- 37,876
I never said to alphabetize, only to bold the powers in the bullet-point list.
Usually the force of habit is having Superhuman Physical Characteristics at the top, then any of the physical-based abilities and then the superpowers from what I've seen in profiles.
Only talking about the TBD scans.
- Status
