- 4,906
- 4,133
Just go on with the changes. We held this thread long enough.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dark Tower: High 1-A Content Revision
- Thread starter Jason_Voorhees1986
- Start date
- Status
- 492
- 174
- 337
- 138
- Thread starter
- #323
It looks like my work here is done. Qawsedf234's suggestion will be followed. @Antvasima 
- 337
- 138
- Thread starter
- #324
Isn't it time to come to a conclusion?
@Antvasima
@Antvasima
- 337
- 138
- Thread starter
- #325
Good day to you all. I’ve spoken with Avtvasima, and now I’d like to speak with you as well. I believe it’s time to close this revision. Qawsedf234 mentioned that approval from two admins would be sufficient, and if they still hold the same view and no one objects, I see no issue with Dark Tower being rated as High 1-A. Also, I’d like to make a few minor updates to the description section of this page—would you approve that? Finally, I’ve updated the Dark Tower profiles, and if you’d like, I’d be happy to share them with you.
@Qawsedf234 @DarkDragonMedeus @Antvasima
@Qawsedf234 @DarkDragonMedeus @Antvasima
- 177,457
- 90,384
I thought that @Qawsedf234 had only accepted this cosmology as reaching 1-A?
Can somebody remind me which staff members that have accepted what here please?
Can somebody remind me which staff members that have accepted what here please?
- 337
- 138
- Thread starter
- #327
If I'm not mistaken, Qawsedf234's view is as follows: if the universes are bound to the same hierarchy as the Tower, then it's 1-A; if not, then it's High 1-A.I thought that @Qawsedf234 had only accepted this cosmology as reaching 1-A?
Can somebody remind me which staff members that have accepted what here please?
- 337
- 138
- Thread starter
- #328
@DarkDragonMedeus @Firestorm808 @Udlmaster @VeryGoofyToddler2
Do you also find Qawsedf234's conclusions acceptable to apply here?
@Antvasima
- 22,714
- 23,327
I accepted the High 1-A because I didn't find the counter 1-A+ stuff good enough.
- 337
- 138
- Thread starter
- #330
Then a decision needs to be made here. If the High 1-A topic is still valid, I will open a CRT soon for the profiles that need to be updated.
- 177,457
- 90,384
I am fine with what Qawsedf234 has accepted here, but we need a list of the other staff members who have evaluated this revision thread as well, so I or somebody else can ping them for a confirmation.
Last edited:
- 337
- 138
- Thread starter
- #332
Didn't Udlmaster say that he had talked about this matter with someone who used to be involved with Dark Tower?I am fine with what Qawsedf234 has accepted here, but we need a list of the other staff members who have evaluated this revision thread as well, so I or somebody else can ping them for a confirmation.
- 177,457
- 90,384
I am fine with what Qawsedf234 has accepted here, but we need a list of the other staff members who have evaluated this revision thread as well, so I or somebody else can ping them for a confirmation.
@Udlmaster
Udlmaster
Any/All- 7,504
- 3,078
Yeah, I'm talking with the former caretaker of DT about it.
So far, it seems the results here are fairly accurate from what I can gather from our talks.
Udlmaster
Any/All- 7,504
- 3,078
Is there a recap of everything discussed so far?Okay. That is good then.
We still likely need a list of all staff members who have helped out here, and a summary of what they currently need to evaluate though.
- 337
- 138
- Thread starter
- #337
@DarkDragonMedeus @Firestorm808 @Udlmaster @VeryGoofyToddler2
Do you also find Qawsedf234's conclusions acceptable to apply here?
@Udlmaster @Antvasima Let me briefly summarize this. Qawsed does not agree with concepts like High 1-A+ and clearly believes that High 1-A is correct. Additionally, udlmaster and DarkDragonMedeus share the same view as Qawsed, so it wouldn't be wrong to say that this opinion is supported by all three individuals.
- 337
- 138
- Thread starter
- #339
Certainly. Now that the High 1-A status has been accepted, I suppose the most reasonable option would be to close this CRT and focus on the other one.
Dark Tower: New Profiles
Earlier this year, I opened a new revision for the Dark Tower, and although the outcome didn’t go exactly as I had hoped, it was decided that the Dark Tower is High 1-A. For this reason, I would like to present some profiles that need to be updated, and I believe these changes should be...
- Status
