It is a logical contradiction to say that the multiverse or mathematical universes cannot be High 1-A+. Both are basically unlimited because absolute infinity is literally “unlimited,” so it encounters standards. If you are not familiar with Modal Realism, I will write an informative text about it.
Modal Realism
Let's take a look at why “Modal Realism” is used in Vsbw for the High 1-A+ definition, how it works, and how we can obtain it, but first of all, I think we need to know what it is.
- What is Modal Realism?
Basically, modal realism is a philosophical movement that posits the existence of metaphysical multiverses, a thesis put forward by philosopher David Levis under the name “possible worlds.” The movement basically deals with “contradictions” [note: contradictions are equivalent to the basic meaning used, literally ‘contradictory’], and the contradiction in question shows that there are no “boundaries” between worlds. For example
Let's take a concept, let's say this concept is “blue.”
Let's consider five characterizations that could arise from the concept of blue
Blue elephant= World X
Blue airplane = World B
Blue lava= World C
Blue human arm= World Y
Blue baby= World F
Basically, it deals with “metaphysical” [note: beyond physics/science, cannot be explained by physics/science] things that are impossible to exist in “our existing world,” that is, it deals with worlds where things that are impossible in the existing laws of physics or similar terms can exist. This explains the
contradiction.
- Why is Modal Realism rated High 1-A+?
The reason why Modal Realism is High 1-A+ is actually clear if we look at the basic reasons. “All possible qualitative superiority extensions,” that is, if we determine them, “qualitative, meta-qualitative, meta-meta-qualitative” and all possible sets that will accommodate or affect them are High 1-A+. This is where the definition of Modal Realism, which follows this logic, comes in. If we are to speak logically, “anything can happen” in possible worlds because, basically, metaphysical possibilities can contain “everything,” that is, A-World 1-A, while B-World can be High 1-A, and this extends as the “entirety of possibilities.” This is why the connection between Modal Realism and High 1-A+ is established.
- Conditions?
As mentioned, if we are to use all possible sets, their restriction or limitation/incompleteness will demonstrate the inadequacy of the set and that the level is merely an “extension.” so the High 1-A+ level is generally known for its anti-features of “inclusion,” “limitation,” or “overcoming.” Of course, I can hear you asking, “If there is something beyond that, wouldn't that be tier 0?” My answer would always be no, because surpassing all possible worlds aligns with the definition of “tier 0” because “God cannot be defined by any possibility.” However, if there is an anti-feat situation in tier 0, it would undermine both tier 0 and High 1-A+.