Common Feat Issue - Destroying/Creating a Forest

[Agnaa]

The References for Common Feats page includes this calc which I take partial issue with.

It says it can be used for the creation of forests, but we don't treat creation feats as equal to destruction feats in that way any more; we quantify them based on comparing their mass to the table on the Creation Feats page.

I'd like to resolve this by changing the name of that section and rewording the calc to make it clear that it's only about destruction, but I think that would require the help of a bot to apply, since links to subsections of a page can't be manually checked on such a wide scale.

If we also want to include creation there, I just whipped up this calc (currently unaccepted) that would put that at 9-A.

 

[Agnaa]

Bump.

 

[Agnaa]

Bump.

 

[Agnaa]

Bump.

 

[Agnaa]

Bump.

 

[KLOL506]

Completely forgot that we use the mass table for Creation Feats below Tier 5 now.

Seems fine at a glance, but one small issue.

I can't find shit on that 1-acre land link thingy anymore, maybe the link got renewed?

 

[Agnaa]

I looked around the website linked in the original calc, and found this page, which says that when planting for reforestation, trees per acre varies from 435-726, and when planting for wildfire enhancement, trees per acre varies from 194-435. That seems to be where the number's from. I'll tidy up the link to go to the exact page. I can alter the link in the references for common feats page, if necessary.

 

[KLOL506]

I looked around the website linked in the original calc, and found this page, which says that when planting for reforestation, trees per acre varies from 435-726, and when planting for wildfire enhancement, trees per acre varies from 194-435. That seems to be where the number's from. I'll tidy up the link to go to the exact page. I can alter the link in the references for common feats page, if necessary.

That's much better.

 

[Agnaa]

Bump!

 

[KLOL506]

@DemonGodMitchAubin @CloverDragon03 @DontTalkDT @AbaddonTheDisappointment @Therefir @Migue79 @Aguywhodoesthings sorry for the agressive tagging LOL, I already gave my evaluation, now it's upto you guys.

 

[DontTalkDT]

Makes sense. I'm ok with the proposed change.

 

[KLOL506]

APPLY AWAY

 

[Agnaa]

Uhh, is there a good way to deal with the links that may be broken by changing that section name?

 

[CloverDragon03]

Agree with DontTalk

 

[KLOL506]

Uhh, is there a good way to deal with the links that may be broken by changing that section name?

I have no clue.

 

[Agnaa]

Actually, I think I could just merge the calc I did and the one currently on the page, and list both ends under that section.

Does that sound fine?

 

[KLOL506]

Actually, I think I could just merge the calc I did and the one currently on the page, and list both ends under that section.

Does that sound fine?

Seems good I guess. But be sure to keep the Destroying ends and Creating Ends separate.

 

[Agnaa]

ofc

 

[Agnaa]

I've edited the page, I also rearranged the calc a little.

 

[KLOL506]

Is there anything else left to do here? Or should I ask someone to close the thread?

 

[Agnaa]

Yeah this thread is done.

 

[KLOL506]

Yeah this thread is done.

'Kay, closure commencing. Will ask staff to close.