• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Can you simplify CM types

Type 1: Independent from reality they govern, affecting reality didn't affect the concept.

Type 2: Dependent from reality they govern, affecting reality also altering the concept. But affecting reality which the concept participates didn't qualify for CM. Only altering the concept will do.

Type 3: Less fundamental concept, only specific scale to which concept they govern. Referring to concept which not elaborated upon such as personal concept.
 
Type 1: Independent from the reality they govern, nuking the reality won't do jackshit to them, but destroying the concept will affect reality at large, for better or for worse.

Type 2: Dependent on the reality they govern, if you destroy the reality, they die too.

Type 3: Less fundamental concept, limited in scale to exactly what they govern. Consider it a personal concept, for example- something that makes up your very being and is a fundamental requirement for your existence but has no effect on the larger reality itself.
 
Can you simplify CM types
Basically, CM's own ability to determine the criteria for the type obtained depends on their dependence on Reality, because the concept itself must be shown to be fundamental.

Type 1: Is a concept that exists outside of reality (Independen), it's like a circle is reality and the concept of type 1 is outside it, besides that the concept is a fundamental of reality (Circle) This type also shows the superiority of the concept of what it regulates (Reality) which makes all phenomena that occur in reality do not affect the concept.

Type 2: Is a concept that participates in constructing reality, It exists as a fundamental aspect of the basic aspects of reality (Space, Time, Etc...) This concept is present in reality which makes their positions interdependent. Reality does not exist, the concept does not exist, otherwise the concept does not exist, then Reality will be affected (It doesn't literally destroy reality, because the concept of type 2 itself operates on a separate aspect, such as if the concept of time didn't exist, then Reality would be impacted but not destroyed, Rather make reality not complex, where there will not be a series of times that show the course of reality, then there is no revolution and causality)

Type 3 : This concept is also not fundamental of reality but fundamental of aspects of reality that do not operate as constructors of reality such as space and time, Simply put, reality will not depend on these concepts, which means that their absence does not have any effect on reality, Rather it affects living things in reality, for example the concept of evil and the concept of beauty which is type 3, without this concept humans will not recognize the nature of beauty And evil nature.
 
Back
Top