- 11,469
- 4,706
yfhv fhv
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, unless statedyfhv fhv
That's isn't how it worksno bruh the AP gap is so big that the regen becomes useless
I've literally seen you acknowledge Low-Godly regen as something that AP can't deal with alone on a DBS thread beforeno bruh the AP gap is so big that the regen becomes useless
wtfI've literally seen you acknowledge Low-Godly regen as something that AP can't deal with alone on a DBS thread before
is this low tier bait?
In most cases, the characters only have 4-D AP but not 4-D DC. Like if character A was to defeat character B, someone who can annihilate timelines, in-battle: it indicates that character A can harm Multiversal threats but doesn’t self-evidently bestow them the ability to destroy timelines themselves. I think most extradimensional DC are deemed as hax anyways which explains why we don’t have a DC section, but have certain characters with walls of hax.I think low 2-C destruction should negate up to mid-godly immortality but i don’t think the wki accepts that
Anyway, even if the character is tier 0, if they only target the victim’s physical body, low-godly regen works
So like what? They are hitting so hard the enemies soul explodes?no bruh the AP gap is so big that the regen becomes useless
by default invulnerability is High 3-A so yes, unless it has higher showings. Ofc that's disregarding the fact that invul is usually poorly appliedok what about invulnerability
say a character has 2-C AP and hes fighting a guy who has 7-A but has invulnerability
would the AP gap bypass
It doesn't say that hereby default invulnerability is High 3-A
It's common sense.It doesn't say that here
No its not, that's like an NLFIt's common sense.
What?… No it’s not.No its not, that's like an NLF
It should only be as strong as the feats suggest, claiming someone would be invulnerable to everything up to high 3-A is a positive claim. Video game characters with invulnerability shouldn't be immune to high 3-A attacks unless they have feats on that lvlWhat?… No it’s not.
Can a “High 3-A punch” vaporise water or dissipate steam?It should only be as strong as the feats suggest, claiming someone would be invulnerable to everything up to high 3-A is a positive claim. Video game characters with invulnerability shouldn't be immune to high 3-A attacks unless they have feats on that lvl
is this a rhetorical questionCan a “High 3-A punch” vaporise water or dissipate steam?
Being water or steam is very different from invulnerability, that's elemental intangibilityCan a “High 3-A punch” vaporise water or dissipate steam?
The page says “It can be considered the defensive equivalent of Durability Negation, negating simple Attack Potency”It should only be as strong as the feats suggest, claiming someone would be invulnerable to everything up to high 3-A is a positive claim. Video game characters with invulnerability shouldn't be immune to high 3-A attacks unless they have feats on that lvl
Yeah dura neg might need feats to prove it can work on higher tiers, depending on the type of dura negThe page says “It can be considered the defensive equivalent of Durability Negation, negating simple Attack Potency”
Unless you think durability negation always needs feats on working on whatever tier we throw it at, dimensionality aside, then no, invulnerability clearly says it is at least High 3-A before higher dimensions negate it
It’s not. Intangibility means you don’t have a physical form but that’s not the case with non-solid states of matter.Being water or steam is very different from invulnerability, that's elemental intangibility
So u mean if a character has a high 3A and above durability, he get invulnerability by default ?by default invulnerability is High 3-A so yes, unless it has higher showings. Ofc that's disregarding the fact that invul is usually poorly applied