- 18,393
- 14,323
Mhm as I said ^^Nope, it's just regeneration. Regenerating from atoms =/= Your existence is reliant on certain parts of the bodies or objects or concepts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mhm as I said ^^Nope, it's just regeneration. Regenerating from atoms =/= Your existence is reliant on certain parts of the bodies or objects or concepts.
To add on this you need statements that your existence is reliant on something or someshit like that in order to get immortality 8 ig?Nope, it's just regeneration. Regenerating from atoms =/= Your existence is reliant on certain parts of the bodies or objects or concepts.
Any object, any concept. Anything, it could even be a nonexistent concept. As long as the said object their immortality reliant on it, it is immortality type 8.
Don't confuse it with regeneration. This is a different topic.
Yes, this guys can regenerate with their heart alone right and can't die as long as it exists, despite it's reliant immortality due to their heart they also regenerate from it.If I understand correctly, “turn” means getting regenerated? If, then, yes, it is just a godly form of regeneration.
Isn't regenerating from heart alone also regeneration? I said any part of the body even from an atom not just returning from being only an atom alone, one is the heart while another is the entire body itself they could return from.Nope, it's just regeneration. Regenerating from atoms =/= Your existence is reliant on certain parts of the bodies or objects or concepts.
Obviously.To add on this you need statements that your existence is reliant on something or someshit like that in order to get immortality 8 ig?
Yes, you need. “I can't be killed as long as my boyfriend exist” would qualifyTo add on this you need statements that your existence is reliant on something or someshit like that in order to get immortality 8 ig?
Layer into NEP.If a non existent nature 2 being got erased from existence, what state would that being be? And what if there's a being that can be on that level of nothingness on a greater level than nature 2, would that just be a layer of nep?
They get two types of immoralities.Yes, this guys can regenerate with their heart alone right and can't die as long as it exists, despite it's reliant immortality due to their heart they also regenerate from it.
It is. It is just you can cast any abilities from source (heart)Isn't regenerating from heart alone also regeneration? I said any part of the body even from an atom not just returning from being only an atom alone, one is the heart while another is the entire body itself they could return from.
Yes, it is layered.If a non existent nature 2 being got erased from existence, what state would that being be? And what if there's a being that can be on that level of nothingness on a greater level than nature 2, would that just be a layer of nep?
I can't be killed as long as my boyfriend exist
The funny thing is, I'm not going to staff to try and sell a point, I'm going to staff to see what their point is and go with it. I don't care which is the correct point, I just want to reach it. If the one I thought was right turns out to be wrong that's perfectly a-ok. It's a bit like science, you question everything but if the proof is solid enough you roll with it.You can staff members, but again your arguments are based on a nonexistent line in the page.
Okay then makes sense.It is just you can cast any abilities from source (heart)
Yea, but in this case since he has regeneration too since he has shown to regenerate from it.Isn't regenerating from heart alone also regeneration? I said any part of the body even from an atom not just returning from being only an atom alone, one is the heart while another is the entire body itself they could return from.
Yet somehow you’re still alive.
“I can't be killed as long as my boyfriend exist”
You can state the level of regeneration ^^. So ya.Yea, but in this case since he has regeneration too since he has shown to regenerate from it.
No, he is joking. He treats me as one. IDKI forgot to ask this but since you brought this up.
Is it @Starfeldway your boyfriend? (he once said it)
I'm still alive .Yet somehow you’re still alive.
Yea, but in this case since he has regeneration too since he has shown to regenerate from it.
Sure, but I still stand to my statement that your disagreement is based on a nonexistent line on the page. Kinda reminded me when someone was trying to downgrade plot manipulation user, and they used this type of nonexistent guidelines arguments.The funny thing is, I'm not going to staff to try and sell a point, I'm going to staff to see what their point is and go with it. I don't care which is the correct point, I just want to reach it. If the one I thought was right turns out to be wrong that's perfectly a-ok. It's a bit like science, you question everything but if the proof is solid enough you roll with it.
I wouldn't discard that possibility, either!Sure, but I still stand to my statement that your disagreement is based on a nonexistent line on the page. Kinda reminded me when someone was trying to downgrade plot manipulation user, and they used this type of nonexistent guidelines arguments.
No offense to you personally, I have nothing against you. But I think you are complicating the issue a little higher, knowing the fact the requirement of immortality is nonexistent.
TrueTherefore you don't have type 8 immortality
Alright no worriesI wouldn't discard that possibility, either!
Being a new user to this wiki, my understanding of the guidelines and ways around here is still growing: Far from me to say I can't be wrong. And I don't see anything wrong with that either. But having a concluded thread with word from staff on the matter and how to handle this could also help in the future if this debate ever arises in the future, without need for another whole debate.
I can’t date at all.
^Mfs see "she/her" and start busting, actual virgin activities.
I can fix that
My genuine reaction to that information: