• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Better exemples for NEP

10,058
8,149
Nonexistent Physiology Page

Currently there are only 3 examples for NEP even when it is a very complicated and specific power (Also, of the 3 examples 2 are with horrible profiles). So let's change it for the sheer sake of quality

Users​

Thats it
 
Last edited:
I'd suggest to order them by nature type, rather than just listing them in no order, but beyond that I'm fine with this.
 
List the ones that have type 1 (and whatever) first, then those that have type 2 (and whatever) and so on.

I'd have expected a bit more examples for type 3, especially as the only example so far already relies on a semantic listed on the page that isn't the usual standard for type 3.
 
I have added two more characters for Type 3

Now, I still think that putting it in order is useless. Some characters already show several types of nature at the same time
 
Well, it helps users to more easily look for a given type for example purposes, although I'm open to what others think on the matter.

Also, is the last example listing the aspect and the type out of order compared to the rest in purpose, or a typo?
 
Right, its done, but in a different way

Three characters with type 1 nature
Three characters with type 2 nature
Three characters with type 3 nature
And three characters with more than one nature
 
I am bumping this, as the following examples are kinda... meh to say the least. Some are fine, some are instead a bit complicated or have bad explanations:

I propose some alternative:
I did it easier, aka 2 per Nature Type.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top