- 7,904
- 14,966
Hawkman, for one.Where?
No, I just like DC enough that we want it to be accurately rated.Just say you hate DC
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hawkman, for one.Where?
No, I just like DC enough that we want it to be accurately rated.Just say you hate DC
Mandrakk was stomping Hawkman, and even then, Hawkman wasn't a "regular superhero" at the time. He was in Nil, so he was dimensionally amped.Hawkman, for one.
Is there any evidence that simply going to Nil makes you strong enough to contend with a 1-A being?He was in Nil, so he was dimensionally amped.
It seems far too exaggerated and unreliable for my tastes.Even then the majority has voted against waiting, so we shouldn't do it.
From what I recall there were far less powerful characters present in the fight against him, that were able to help out, but it has been a long while since I read the story.Where?
Things are usually not nearly as conveniently black and white simplistic as that.Just say you hate DC
Agreed. Nothing in the story remotely implied such an extreme power-up. The writer likely just didn't care about staying true to previously established concepts.Is there any evidence that simply going to Nil makes you strong enough to contend with a 1-A being?
The whole team was teleported to Nil because of a small piece of Nth metal (not Element X). I find it hard to believe all of them were amped infinitely by such an event and I don't think it's the most realistic interpretation.
Shouldn't be relevant, Argument from Incredulity exists.It seems far too exaggerated and unreliable for my tastes.
Mandrakk was stomping everyone, the only people who put up a fight was Neon and Alden, and even then they admitted they couldn't destroy him and had to change his biology.From what I recall there were far less powerful characters present in the fight against him, that were able to help out, but it has been a long while since I read the story.
We know he would be amped, and this fight itself would be the evidence that the amp reaches 1-A levels.Is there any evidence that simply going to Nil makes you strong enough to contend with a 1-A being?
That's still Argument from Incredulity, as it happens to be the case.The whole team was teleported to Nil because of a small piece of Nth metal (not Element X). I find it hard to believe all of them were amped infinitely by such an event and I don't think it's the most realistic interpretation.
Regardless of how one-sided may have looked, the fact that they were involved in the fight at all is extremely problematic. It would be comparable to a regular human attempting to fight the galaxy itself. The fact that Mandrakk even needed to acknowledge their presence, and was physically fighting them, is completely unrealistic given the purported gap in power.Mandrakk was stomping everyone, the only people who put up a fight was Neon and Alden, and even then they admitted they couldn't destroy him and had to change his biology.
How do we know that? I don't know of any information that suggests you need to be amped to go to Nil.We know he would be amped
There isn't much controversy, the majority agree with it. Only two people don'tWell, Mandrakk was not presented as anywhere near the scale of threat that he was previously, so I would rather just remove his extra statistics key if there is this much controversy surrounding it.
Them being involved is irrelevant if they didn't manage to do any actual damage.Regardless of how one-sided may have looked, the fact that they were involved in the fight at all is extremely problematic
The human can certainly try to fight the galaxy, he just wouldn't be able to do anything. Same thing here.It would be comparable to a regular human attempting to fight the galaxy itself
It's not unrealistic because again, Hawkman was AMPED. Mandrakk acknowledging their presence is irrelevant, why would Mandrakk ignore a guy talking to him? Plus Mandrakk might have wanted to feed himThe fact that Mandrakk even needed to acknowledge their presence, and was physically fighting them, is completely unrealistic given the purported gap in power.
Show scans of Hawkman doing some damage, and again, Hawkman was amped. Please don't ignore the amped partYes, if Mandrakk was more than an uncountable infinity ^ an uncountable infinity times stronger than Hawkman, the latter shouldn't have been able to do anything at all. This entire argument seems like an idiotic time-waster to me.
One of the people who disagree is one of the most knowledgeable DC Comics experts that we have available, and the other is at the very least highly knowledgeable about the verse, and technically the highest ranked staff member here in combination.There isn't much controversy, the majority agree with it. Only two people don't
Donttalk confirmed that existing in higher realms increase your tiers. Plus DC itself has shown people getting amped in higher realms like Boomtubes and Superman getting 4-D vision in bleed(Final Crisis: Superman Beyond #1)Someone is going to have to explain to me why we are taking it for granted that being in Nil makes you amped, because I am not aware of such information.
The people who agreed are also highly knowledgeable.One of the people who disagree is one of the most knowledgeable DC Comics experts that we have available
Having knowledge≠Being able to use it in the best way(for example, you have to admit Xearsay is knowledgeable but you don't agree with him using it properly).and the other is at the very least highly knowledgeable about the verse, and technically the highest ranked staff member here in combination
I showed proof it is supported and you haven't countered it, like show me where you addressed the amped part.In addition, again, this relates to an absolutely massively extreme tier that is completely unsupported by the story in question
So one disagreement, cool. Lots of other people have agreed with it, I still don't see why one staff member's opinion it enough to completely reject a thread.so I am firmly rejecting this revision
Without seeing what he said specifically I can't address his reasoning or whether it applies here, but DT is just a person. Being staff doesn't mean your opinions become site standards.Donttalk confirmed that existing in higher realms increase your tiers.
4-D vision isn't an amp, and the boomtube concept is for the realms of the New Gods, not Nil. There's no reason to transpose that concept to Nil without in-comic evidence.Plus DC itself has shown people getting amped in higher realms like Boomtubes and Superman getting 4-D vision in bleed(Final Crisis: Superman Beyond #1)
Plus I will note that a lot of the arguments of the people who disagree fall under Argument from IncredulitySo one disagreement, cool. Lots of other people have agreed with it, I still don't see why one staff member's opinion it enough to completely reject a thread.
Without seeing what he said specifically I can't address his reasoning or whether it applies here, but DT is just a person. Being staff doesn't mean your opinions become site standards.
Still technically is, just not a physical one4-D vision isn't an amp
Actually there is. The increase in size itself is evidence.and the boomtube concept is for the realms of the New Gods, not Nil. There's no reason to transpose that concept to Nil without in-comic evidence.
Uh, he doesn't say anything like what you claim.
It's not even clear if the concept of "size" applies in the manner you are suggesting.Actually there is. The increase in size itself is evidence.
THANK YOU. Hawkman existing there is irrelevant, he failed to do any relevant damage and was getting casually toyed onAlso Mandrakk was literally toying with Hawkman. He wasn’t actually going all out. He was playing with him like food.
Uh, he doesn't say anything like what you claim.
However, for things like reality-fiction differences where a lower level of reality is just some random book, being able to function as a normal human that is able to do normal stuff like lift books, on that higher plane, can be a feat that allows scaling. If that is the case some other being bringing you to that plane can also be seen as power boost.
Can you elaborate?It's not even clear if the concept of "size" applies in the manner you are suggesting.
We don't have profiles for realms, so you are going to have to explain what this means and how it is accepted.Nil is currently accepted to have a qualitative superiority, otherwise it wouldn't be 1-A.
The concept of space and time are irregular in Nil. It isn't as though they just literally expanded to the size of universal super-giants.Can you elaborate?
The profiles of the Endless are proof it is accepted as 1-A. Their scaling from this is also used for other characters like Lucifer, who is in turn used to scale many characters like Michael.We don't have profiles for realms, so you are going to have to explain what this means and how it is accepted.
Example?More importantly, going to a qualitatively superior realm is still possible without obtaining that same superiority yourself. DC has demonstrated this numerous times.
We know it is irregular but we don't know how it is irregular. Saying they weren't literally expanded is an assumption. Plus by this logic nothing 1-A or above would work size-wise because space and time functions differently that high.The concept of space and time are irregular in Nil. It isn't as though they just literally expanded to the size of universal super-giants.
Shazam and Green Lantern went to the Fifth Dimension without being 5-D. They appeared flat to the native residents, and didn't have any power, but they were still able to exist within and navigate the Fifth Dimension.Example?
Pretty much all 1-A beings simply transcend spacetime.Plus by this logic nothing 1-A or above would work size-wise because space and time functions differently that high.
That was specifically due to magic which the wiki itself says defies physics. Plus as you said, they were 2D in the realm, Hawkman was 3D in Nil.Shazam and Green Lantern went to the Fifth Dimension without being 5-D. They appeared flat to the native residents, and didn't have any power, but they were still able to exist within and navigate the Fifth Dimension.
I have some sort of memory of this happening but don't specifically remember it, can you shows scans?Another example is Supergirl, she went to Apokolips without a Boom Tube and appeared small to the residents there.
Nay. Aleph 2 dimensions is 1-A, Aleph Omega is 1-A+, Inaccessible is High 1-A, and Mahlo is 0.Pretty much all 1-A beings simply transcend spacetime.
That doesn't change the fact that they existed there without being qualitatively superior. The manner in which they accomplished this is secondary to the fact that it's clearly possible.That was specifically due to magic which the wiki itself says defies physics
I didn't say that, and they were not 2-D in the realm. They were 3-D, but the realm was 5-D.Plus as you said, they were 2D in the realm, Hawkman was 3D in Nil.
Wrong, the fact that magic defies physics means the qualitative superiority properties wouldn't apply, being physics based. There was nothing suggesting Hawkman was amped by magic, so the standard properties apply to him.That doesn't change the fact that they existed there without being qualitatively superior. The manner in which they accomplished this is secondary to the fact that it's clearly possible.
Even if they were somehow flat and not 2D, Hawkman wasn't flat in Nil.I didn't say that, and they were not 2-D in the realm. They were 3-D, but the realm was 5-D.
Okay, so let's be extremely clear here, do you concede the fact that you can in fact exist within a qualitatively superior realm without being qualitatively superior?Wrong, the fact that magic defies physics means the qualitative superiority properties wouldn't apply, being physics based. There was nothing suggesting Hawkman was amped by magic, so the standard properties apply to him.
Because Nil isn't 5-D.Even if they were somehow flat and not 2D, Hawkman wasn't flat in Nil.
In specific circumstances, ig.Okay, so let's be extremely clear here, do you concede the fact that you can in fact exist within a qualitatively superior realm without being qualitatively superior?
How is that relevant? Nil is still a qualitatively superior area.Because Nil isn't 5-D.
Okay, then why would it be a default assumption that it's an amp rather than something else?In specific circumstances, ig.
The reason Shazam and GL were "flat" is because they were in a higher-dimensional realm. They were 3-D, but appear flat to 5-D beings. It wasn't due to their "lack of qualitatively superiority" and I was not suggesting that going to a higher realm without being amped always makes you appear flat.How is that relevant? Nil is still a qualitatively superior area.
Because Hawkman didn't reach there with magic, he reached there with nth metalOkay, then why would it be a default assumption that it's an amp rather than something else
What? Them existing in a higher dimension without being higher-dimensional themselves IS proof they weren't qualitatively superior.The reason Shazam and GL were "flat" is because they were in a higher-dimensional realm. They were 3-D, but appear flat to 5-D beings. It wasn't due to their "lack of qualitatively superiority"
You may not have been, but there's no proof you can go to a higher dimension without being higher dimensional yourself and not be flat. Saying you can would be an assumption. And again, they still had to defy physics, which we have no proof Hawkman did.and I was not suggesting that going to a higher realm without being amped always makes you appear flat.
You're missing my point. Regardless of what means Shazam might have used to reach the Fifth Dimension, the important part was the proof of concept: That you can be transported into a higher realm without being amped. Who is to say Nth Metal doesn't work the same way? Why is the default assumption that Nth Metal must have amped them infinitely, when Nth Metal has never been shown to have that level of power?Because Hawkman didn't reach there with magic, he reached there with nth metal
I don't know where we crossed wires here, but that's not what I am saying. The flatness is unique to the Fifth Dimension, it's not an inherent trait of anyone in a higher realm without being amped.What? Them existing in a higher dimension without being higher-dimensional themselves IS proof they weren't qualitatively superior.
Depends entirely on the author and storyline.However, by this are you conceding that higher dimensions in DC have qualitative superiorities?
It's not even clear if physics apply in Nil, and again, I reject the idea that we should assume by default that amps were used and not some other method.You may not have been, but there's no proof you can go to a higher dimension without being higher dimensional yourself and not be flat. Saying you can would be an assumption. And again, they still had to defy physics, which we have no proof Hawkman did.
Who is to say nth metal DOES work that way? You are adding an extra assumption that it works with magic. Plus again, even when they reached 5-D with magic they were flat. So the fact nth metal also made them look proper, something that never happened before, would be adding an extra assumption. That's 2 extra assumptions.You're missing my point. Regardless of what means Shazam might have used to reach the Fifth Dimension, the important part was the proof of concept: That you can be transported into a higher realm without being amped. Who is to say Nth Metal doesn't work the same way?
This instance itself can be the evidence for that.Why is the default assumption that Nth Metal must have amped them infinitely, when Nth Metal has never been shown to have that level of power?
Was it ever stated that the flatness is unique to 5-D? Plus you said in the general discussion thread that Allen Adam viewed lower dimensions as flat.I don't know where we crossed wires here, but that's not what I am saying. The flatness is unique to the Fifth Dimension, it's not an inherent trait of anyone in a higher realm without being amped.
Canonically?Depends entirely on the author and storyline.
Going by the current tiering standards, physics apply everywhere.It's not even clear if physics apply in Ni
As I showed before, that's too reliant on assumptions. Occam's Razor exists.and again, I reject the idea that we should assume by default that amps were used and not some other method
Assuming it gives an amp is also an assumption.Who is to say nth metal DOES work that way? You are adding an extra assumption that it works with magic.
That's circular reasoning. We are determining whether the amp is present at all.This instance itself can be the evidence for that.
You're missing the point, I am responding to you pointing out that Hawkman wasn't flat. I am explaining why his lack of "flatness" is not relevant nor indicative of an amp.Was it ever stated that the flatness is unique to 5-D?
What?Going by the current tiering standards, physics apply everywhere.
Assuming there's an amp is also an assumption. Also, Occam's Razor is a heuristic, not a law of logic.As I showed before, that's too reliant on assumptions. Occam's Razor exists.