The problem with your argument is that you're relying on, at best, circumstantial evidence to assert that there are contradictions to the explicit (ish) information we've been given. You reversed the burden of proof despite being the one who made a claim. The unknown variables you haven't considered support my rebuttal.
Let's demonstrate this clearly:
Firstly, we do see the gates fall, literally speaking. The point remains that we do not know the mechanics behind this. "We see them drop so they must have free-fell" is just a leap in logic.
Anything that can bypass the 72 barriers can't be assumed to be a "regular" object.
what implies the opposite? and we do see them fall, we are told they fall
You then attempt to reverse the burden of proof. I'm not the one making an assertion here,
YOU are. I do not need to prove the opposite; I just need to point out the assumptions you've made in your premises.
made of light isnt the same as light speed
Besides the fact that this doesn't make a lick of sense, you've missed the point. Your claim was that regular objects fall to Seireitei in a short time period - fragemnts of light are not regular objects. Why do you assume they free-fell, when that is
clearly not the only possibility here?
Yeah cuz they crash from high up? +Lille was still alive through those pieces
The implication here was that they exerted a lot of force and F=M/A. Again, you assume regular free-fall when that is unambiguous, at best, and outright wrong, at worst.
He acted as if its an active threat, not something that will happen in like a week or more from now. and yes why not
This is only relevant if you assume Tōshirō knows about the Reiōkyu to the extent you want him to, which is unverifiable.