• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Asgore Dreemurr vs Sans

Chartate101 said:
we should bloodlust Asgore then. If not, it's an unfair advantage
what? no, if not we would need to bloodlust all of zenos enemies. its an advantege that he has, and there is no reason to take it away
 
Bombzilla said:
That's the thing. Asgore isn't bloodlusted. And sans is always assumed to be bloodlusted in his fights because otherwise he wouldn't fight.
Bombzilla wrote:

You do realize that all sans fights have him bloodlusted, correct? It's a thing that we have to do, or else he wouldn't fight.

You literally said the same thing again. Please explain why he wouldn't fight if he wasn't bloodlusted. You make a claim; (he wouldn't fight unless he was bloodlusted) twice and provide no evidence, at all.
 
When you voted for Asgore but got ignored

Not that it'll make much of a difference, but there were a few others that sided with Asgore as well.
 
Bombzilla wrote:

You do realize that all sans fights have him bloodlusted, correct? It's a thing that we have to do, or else he wouldn't fight.

You literally said the same thing again. Please explain why he wouldn't fight if he wasn't bloodlusted. You make a claim; (he wouldn't fight unless he was bloodlusted) twice and provide no evidence, at all.

Dude, thats the thing. I dont NEED evidence. Its kind of a rule that sans needs to be bloodlusted in order to fight. Go to sans's wins and losses then look at them. They all have sans bloodlusted. Do you really expect sans to fight in character? No. You dont. Because he wouldnt. And if you dont believe me, just ask a staff member who knows a lot about undertale and sans fights. They will tell you the same thing.
 
Bombzilla said:
Bombzilla wrote:

You do realize that all sans fights have him bloodlusted, correct? It's a thing that we have to do, or else he wouldn't fight.
You literally said the same thing again. Please explain why he wouldn't fight if he wasn't bloodlusted. You make a claim; (he wouldn't fight unless he was bloodlusted) twice and provide no evidence, at all.
Dude, thats the thing. I dont NEED evidence. Its kind of a rule that sans needs to be bloodlusted in order to fight. Go to sans's wins and losses then look at them. They all have sans bloodlusted. Do you really expect sans to fight in character? No. You dont. Because he wouldnt. And if you dont believe me, just ask a staff member who knows a lot about undertale and sans fights. They will tell you the same thing.
But you do need evidence. Would Sans fight in character? He did against Chara. Give him a very good incentive and he would probably fight. I don't think the difference between a genocide route and one which you kill one less monster is gonna make him immediately bloodlusted, but it decides whether you fight him. He fights based off of incentive canonically. He probably would fight if he was bloodlusted, and if he had a good incentive so no. Being bloodlusted isn't the only reason he would fight. If he was bloodlusted against Chara, he probably wouldn't have been so calm and collected, and almost defensive.
 
bloodlust on this wiki is someone who does EVERYTHING they can to kill teh enemy, and he fought you because you were about to destroy all of raelity, while when you spare someone that doesent happen
 
Ricsi-viragosi said:
bloodlust on this wiki is someone who does EVERYTHING they can to kill teh enemy, and he fought you because you were about to destroy all of raelity, while when you spare someone that doesent happe
Bloodlusted characters are very willing to take damage and rarely plan ahead while in battle. None of these things applied to Sans in the Chara battle. He had a very good incentive to try his damn hardest to kill Chara, but he wasn't bloodlusted. He was calm and smart about the fight.
 
Bloodlust refers to a state where a character is fighting without any inhibitions, and cares about nothing other than defeating the enemy.

Bloodlust simply means you remove morals and the characters go all out from the start

it does line up
 
Ricsi-viragosi said:
Bloodlust refers to a state where a character is fighting without any inhibitions, and cares about nothing other than defeating the enemy.
Bloodlust simply means you remove morals and the characters go all out from the start

it does line up
He forgot this: Bloodlusted characters fear nothing, and won't hesitate taking injures if it leads to a higher probability of winning a battle.
 
^ yea this is sans game sorry bud in the words of Broly on TFS "Whats a KING to A GOD" I mean he replied with athiestic reply but got ended right there so...
 
Asgore can neither able to tank sans attacks for that much nor does sans have low stamina, as he spams danmaku for quiet a bit

how?
sans has low stamina compared to asgore's attack hell.
 
Asgires stamina is mostly useless compared to sanses as he gets killed pretty easly and has no way to counter teleprtation, which sans can do even while exhaustet
 
Grimreaperofjustice said:
^ well it depends if he killed/spared them he didn't manage to kill sans just well make him quit/ lock em in place never really killed/ spared em
dude,if you are talking about karma , then stop, it was explained that karma has no affect on actual karma but is just a name, secondly, if you mean frisk., then they just plain out oneshot asgore.

if you mean sans, he goes for the thousent cuts strategy, eating away at your helt at extreme speeds
 
Ricsi-viragosi said:
Grimreaperofjustice said:
^ well it depends if he killed/spared them he didn't manage to kill sans just well make him quit/ lock em in place never really killed/ spared em
dude,if you are talking about karma , then stop, it was explained that karma has no affect on actual karma but is just a name, secondly, if you mean frisk., then they just plain out oneshot asgore.
if you mean sans, he goes for the thousent cuts strategy, eating away at your helt at extreme speeds
SMH WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT I GET THE KAMRA THING dang people anyway what IM talking abiut is if your talking about whos stronger sans techanclly is stronger than Frisk and if Frisk is stronger than Asgore you have your winner..
 
Can't this be added already? We have more then enough votes and it was generally agreed upon. Also this thread is a shit storm. Its been derailed multiple times and has been going on for the longest time. This should be added and closed.
 
Bombzilla said:
Can't this be added already? We have more then enough votes and it was generally agreed upon. Also this thread is a shit storm. Its been derailed multiple times and has been going on for the longest time. This should be added and closed.
This.
 
Back
Top