- 1,281
- 151
- Thread starter
- #41
All should has is precogArceus wins this. Too many passives that Sora doesn't have counters for
̶A̶r̶c̶e̶u̶s̶ ̶v̶s̶ ̶S̶h̶u̶l̶k̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶a̶ ̶b̶e̶t̶t̶e̶r̶ ̶m̶a̶t̶c̶h̶u̶p̶ ̶
Does it work against aca type 4 and passives?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All should has is precogArceus wins this. Too many passives that Sora doesn't have counters for
̶A̶r̶c̶e̶u̶s̶ ̶v̶s̶ ̶S̶h̶u̶l̶k̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶a̶ ̶b̶e̶t̶t̶e̶r̶ ̶m̶a̶t̶c̶h̶u̶p̶ ̶
That's been done before too and it was an incon for reasons I don't rememberArceus wins this. Too many passives that Sora doesn't have counters for
̶A̶r̶c̶e̶u̶s̶ ̶v̶s̶ ̶S̶h̶u̶l̶k̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶a̶ ̶b̶e̶t̶t̶e̶r̶ ̶m̶a̶t̶c̶h̶u̶p̶ ̶
It's pointless now that I think about it. Shulk can't interact with AE 1 anywayThat's been done before too and it was an incon for reasons I don't remember
But Arceus has even more passives now and hax
I don't get itAll should has is precog
Does it work against aca type 4 and passives?
Shulk can interact with AE 1, he can interact with AlvisIt's pointless now that I think about it. Shulk can't interact with AE 1 anyway
I see. He can make that match then. It's going to end pretty badly tho, like alwaysShulk can interact with AE 1, he can interact with Alvis
The match can be done, but I don't know if there are any active Xenoblade supporters willing to argue.I see. He can make that match then. It's going to end pretty badly tho, like always
Arceus doesn't need itShulk can interact with AE 1, he can interact with Alvis
I don't care about arceus' passives or whatever, I simply responded to the fact that it was said that Shulk could not interact with AE1.Arceus doesn't need it
Arceus has many passives that would put shulk on the news
*All shulk has is precognitionI don't get it
This is derailing a bit. I think you should make a matchup for that if you wanted to*All shulk has is precognition
Does it bypass acusality type 4 and Arceus passives?
I don't care about arceus' passives or whatever, I simply responded to the fact that it was said that Shulk could not interact with AE
actually you know what?This is derailing a bit. I think you should make a matchup for that if you wanted to
you could ask in the matchup evaluation thread.actually you know what?
Is Sora Vs Shulk a good matchup?
Passive attack negation and null, madness type 2,mind hax,void, conceptual and probably morePersonal Interest
Can someone lists Arceus' passives and why they are so deadly
And also why Arceus is hard to affect
99x layers of fodder low 2C character resiances don't look like they'd do anything to a 2A who fodderized 2A while weakened.... In his Avatar formMadoka conceptually erases Arceus. Anos effortlessly does the same but with 99x layers on top.
Proof? Especially that "conceptual" hax.Passive attack negation and null, madness type 2,mind hax,void, conceptual and probably more
All of Arceus hax are either layeryed or conceptual
Arceus has AE 1,That Luffy range,large size 9,and immortality type 8 and 9
Stop using headcanon. It's 4d, and not nlf.99x layers of fodder low 2C character resiances don't look like they'd do anything to a 2A who fodderized 2A while weakened.... In his Avatar form
You've been missing out manProof? Especially that "conceptual" hax.Stop wanking Arceus.
That's on you. 99x layers of low 2C resistances is meaningless against someone who can null 2A conceptual beings in his weakest stateStop using headcanon. It's 4d, and not nlf.
On what? Also, prove it's consistently used across every piece of media.You've been missing out man
Dude, stop. You don't understand anything about this site's standards (well, neither do I tbh), but at least I know this much.That's on you. 99x layers of low 2C resistances is meaningless against someone who can null 2A conceptual beings in his weakest state
Pretty sure the wincons for Arceus were valid. Stop derailingProof? Especially that "conceptual" hax.Stop wanking Arceus.
I don't??? Don't make me laugh. Read my statements carefullyDude, stop. You don't understand anything about this site's standards (well, neither do I tbh), but at least I know this much.
Yea, sure. You're most likely from another site anyway (with those "standards"). Lmao, whatever helps you sleep at night.I don't??? Don't make me laugh. Read my statements carefully
You're trolling right?On what? Also, prove it's consistently used across every piece of media.
No. Stop wanking.You're trolling right?
I don't even care about Anos TBHCan everyone stfu about Anos? I am sick of this. Every thread about Arceus has mentions of Anos, every thread about Anos has mentions of Arceus. THIS IS ARCEUS VS SORA NOT ARCEUS VS ANOS SO STFU BEFORE I REPORT ALL OF YOU DAMNIT
Stop Derailing. If you feel you want to make Anos vs Arceus match, do that outside of this threadNo. Stop wanking.
Look up the threads, and if you want to contest Arceus's shit, then do please make a CRTNo. Stop wanking.
Weren't you the one who asked/started this? Regardless, a no-no to your stuff.Stop Derailing. If you feel you want to make Anos vs Arceus match, do that outside of this thread
This is Sora Vs Arcreus
Look up the threads, and if you want to contest Arceus's shit, then do please make a CRT
On what? Also, prove it's consistently used across every piece of media.
I don't give a flying ****, make a CRT.On what? Also, prove it's consistently used across every piece of media.
**** off then. No-one asked you to comment here. Don't give me nasty attitude.I don't give a flying ****, make a CRT.
Calm it down and stop detailing please.**** off then. No-one asked you to comment here. Don't give me nasty attitude.
Spoken as the one who seems dead set on derailing, and please, calm down, this is a versus thread, if you have an issue with a profile, make a Content Revision Thread, this is how it's always been.**** off then. No-one asked you to comment here. Don't give me nasty attitude.
Spoken as the one who seems dead set on derailing, and please, calm down, this is a versus thread, if you have an issue with a profile, make a Content Revision Thread, this is how it's always been.