- 12,562
- 2,517
After rewatching the match of 17 vs Jiren... people are seriously overhyping 17. Yes, Jiren was more powerful. Yes, Jiren was more supressed against Hit. However, just because someone fights another character doesn't mean they're comparable. 17 got a point blank sneak attack, sure, but afterwards was foddered by Jiren, with at least 20 of his barriers being casually punched through in a row. Jiren vs 17 in episode 131 is an inconclusive feat as Jiren was severely weakened, much more so than 17.
Another example is Ganos vs Goku which happened briefly at the start of the T.O.P. Ganos was able to take hits from Goku, and yet was knocked off by weakened Master Roshi. If anything, I'd say 17 not getting knocked off immediately by Jiren was plot reasons to build up suspense.
Also, I'd like to address the whole argument that 17 can think up a strategy vs Hit. Let's look at Hit's previous matches to see how that goes.
Vegeta vs Hit (universe 6 arc): Vegeta had no clue about Hit's technique and lost easily to Hit's weakest state.
Goku vs Hit (future trunks saga): Goku had no clue about Hit's technique and was one shot. Compared to...
Goku vs Hit (universe 6 arc): Goku was told about, and explicitly saw Hit's time skip, so he was able to form a strategy against it.
Dyspo vs Hit (universe survival arc): He explicitly knew about Hit's time skip, so he was able to form a strategy against it.
17 hasn't explicitly been shown to see Hit's time skip. Even if we assume he has, he wouldn't know about Hit's other techniques, nor the severity of his techniques out of tournament settings. Ik I've changed my vote already, but it's obvious that Hit held his own better than 17 in their respective fights against Jiren by far, and my previous point about 17 not knowing about Hit's techniques hasn't been disproven yet. Therefore I change my vote back to Hit.
TL;DR: 17's durability and AP advantages aren't as big as people are making them out to be. Hit's techniques are deadly to 17 who hasn't been shown to have a clue what he's capable of.
Another example is Ganos vs Goku which happened briefly at the start of the T.O.P. Ganos was able to take hits from Goku, and yet was knocked off by weakened Master Roshi. If anything, I'd say 17 not getting knocked off immediately by Jiren was plot reasons to build up suspense.
Also, I'd like to address the whole argument that 17 can think up a strategy vs Hit. Let's look at Hit's previous matches to see how that goes.
Vegeta vs Hit (universe 6 arc): Vegeta had no clue about Hit's technique and lost easily to Hit's weakest state.
Goku vs Hit (future trunks saga): Goku had no clue about Hit's technique and was one shot. Compared to...
Goku vs Hit (universe 6 arc): Goku was told about, and explicitly saw Hit's time skip, so he was able to form a strategy against it.
Dyspo vs Hit (universe survival arc): He explicitly knew about Hit's time skip, so he was able to form a strategy against it.
17 hasn't explicitly been shown to see Hit's time skip. Even if we assume he has, he wouldn't know about Hit's other techniques, nor the severity of his techniques out of tournament settings. Ik I've changed my vote already, but it's obvious that Hit held his own better than 17 in their respective fights against Jiren by far, and my previous point about 17 not knowing about Hit's techniques hasn't been disproven yet. Therefore I change my vote back to Hit.
TL;DR: 17's durability and AP advantages aren't as big as people are making them out to be. Hit's techniques are deadly to 17 who hasn't been shown to have a clue what he's capable of.