Ayewale
He/Him- 1,070
- 788
Though fandom policy is inconsistent, it's also the only policy we're basing our rules off and we should still abide by it. Even if it acts only when pushed, that means we should delete verses only when they're deemed appropriate. If fandom hasn't deleted a wiki after seventeen years, the only reasonable assumption is that it's allowed until proven otherwise.Quoting you.
Fandom only seems to act when it is pushed to do so. Even very large wikis can probably avoid action- in fact, several very large wikis are still only netting very small amounts of visits and user edits. I know because I used to run one.
We have specifically given rules that state that, no, even if you can avoid the ****, if the intent of the game is ****, then it isn't acceptable. I also don't understand why this is being so hotly debated.
The VSBW guidelines aren't supposed to be any harsher than fandom's, though. Assuming you (and everyone else) aren't arguing for the wiki being needlessly puritan, we shouldn't bar any verse from being included that fandom has given the okay to.Useful Information...