• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

All-purpose request thread (New forum)

Hello, can someone please unlock the following profiles, so I can add this accepted CRT ?




Hasn't been accepted yet.
 
Hello! This page got deleted without any notice, even though there are already crts, blogs, etc... about it, and it has been closed under the misconception that it might be a fanfic (which it isn't, it has no relation whatsoever with Percy Jackson, with the only similarity from what I can find is that it mentions Mythology Gods). Is there any way to restore it, or do I have to publish the page again?
 
Stomp
 

The article should have the character renamed to Silk (both title and text). Yes, that's her official name according to the show's second season. For the title, use "Silk (Panty and Stocking)"
 
That's not even a real profile, it's just a user page normally used for sandboxes.

The page itself seems unfinished to me, it lacks justifications and a picture.
 
Stomp match, can someone check this?
 
Grace has ended for this


Please close this and add it to both profiles
 
Then how do I add something from sandbox into the verse page ?

I understand the justification requirement, but why the picture? There is no picture of him yet.
Take the source code from the sandbox, put it in a page. It's just copy + paste.

You don't need a picture if one doesn't exist.
 
Oh lol.

There's a button at the top right, just to the right of where it says how many pages we have on the wiki. One of them has the icon of a page, should be third to the right. That creates a page on the mainspace of the wiki, rather than a sandbox.
 
Can this profile be renamed to "Swordsman (Horrorclix)"?
The issue is so many other profiles list the page as an ability for the character its about, with the amount of profiles doing this being up to around 20 (some just listing the actual character themselves), and even more on other past profiles before those got fixed.

Maybe also having "Swordsman" as a redirect to Weapon Mastery could also fix the issue
 
Can this profile be renamed to "Swordsman (Horrorclix)"?
The issue is so many other profiles list the page as an ability for the character its about, with the amount of profiles doing this being up to around 20 (some just listing the actual character themselves), and even more on other past profiles before those got fixed.

Maybe also having "Swordsman" as a redirect to Weapon Mastery could also fix the issue
It's done.

@Emirp sumitpo Please be careful when adding abilities like these.
 
Confused, I thought you only needed 3 votes for things that are tier 2 or higher?
It is important to note that this requirement should not be interpreted as a guarantee that the proposed revisions will be approved if a minimum of three staff members have given their approval. In cases involving big or controversial changes, or in situations where a verse is one where many of our staff members are knowledgeable, it may be advisable to involve as many staff members as possible in the review and approval process.
Instances of minor revisions may include changes to one or two characters, if it is just the addition of simple abilities that do not fall into the categories of Acausality (except type 1), Conceptual Manipulation, Abstract Existence, Plot Manipulation, Information Manipulation, Causality Manipulation, Nonexistent Physiology, Law Manipulation, etc. or otherwise could be considered particularly controversial or noteworthy.
Here
 
But AK isn't that well-known and I already asked numerous staffs to come yet only Grath and DDM who has responded
Actually Lev, would you like to evaluate that CRT? It's only need one more staffs now, please we need to proceed as the CRT has been stuck for a months
 
Last edited:
Which part in particular are you noting here as proof that it would require 3 staff votes?

I ask because the quotes you used aren't very clear about what you mean. This isn't a particularly controversial change, and the matter regarding minor revisions specifies situations where you cannot pass a thread on the basis of 1 staff vote - not situations where you cannot pass a thread on the basis of 2 staff votes. All the discussion rules have to say is that threads should receive 3 staff votes if they are for particularly notable works because there are more relevant parties who should be aware of and willing to sign off on the change. As far as I can tell, there shouldn't be any issue with passing a thread like this for a relatively ordinary verse.
 
Which part in particular are you noting here as proof that it would require 3 staff votes?

I ask because the quotes you used aren't very clear about what you mean. This isn't a particularly controversial change, and the matter regarding minor revisions specifies situations where you cannot pass a thread on the basis of 1 staff vote - not situations where you cannot pass a thread on the basis of 2 staff votes. All the discussion rules have to say is that threads should receive 3 staff votes if they are for particularly notable works because there are more relevant parties who should be aware of and willing to sign off on the change. As far as I can tell, there shouldn't be any issue with passing a thread like this for a relatively ordinary verse.
That the abilities highlighted can be considered controversial and thus require more scrutiny. I've always seen it (and have applied it as such many times) that upon threads dealing with the aforementioned abilities to always seek at least three to satisfy that higher scrutiny.

But hey, if we don't have to, even better. I'll have that in mind for the future.
 
Shigaraki has no way of getting past Hulk's 1A resurrection nor does he have a way to incapacitate him


this is a stomp and should be closed
 
I need these profiles to be unlocked so I can apply the changes from this revision, which was accepted.






 
Add '(Pokémon)' to the titles of these profiles (to distinguish them from other profiles)

 
Could somebody please add a '(The Bloop Diet)' to this profile's title? 'Bloop' is the name of a real life cryptid/event, and so there's more than one fictionalized version of the thing.
 
I need these profiles to be unlocked so I can apply the changes from this revision, which was accepted.







Done. I have already applied the changes. These profiles can be locked again.

Since the changes have been applied, the thread should also be closed:

 
I believe this thread can be passed, I was awaiting the opinion on a staff who suggested a change which I have now implemented, so I don't believe there is anything else to evaluate.
 
Back
Top