supertomioka
He/Him- 148
- 181
You are arguing something entirely different what I said was about 1A not dimensions re-read the tiering system. Also comic curator isn't he a DC cosmic armor superman meat gobbler why does he make so much db content.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
All Purpose Dragon Ball Thread
- Thread starter Warren_Valion
- Start date
You are arguing something entirely different what I said was about 1A not dimensions re-read the tiering system. Also comic curator isn't he a DC cosmic armor superman meat gobbler why does he make so much db content.
- 54
- 46
Currently participating in the Kuro vs CC Goku thread. I'm gonna be completely honest here, I genuinely feel manipulating the Time Scrolls should grant plot manipulation.
- 54
- 46
Another thing that's come to my attention is that there's still quite a few powers and abilities that haven't been added to Time Power. An example would be 'damage transfer', as seen when Chronoa transferred all the damage that was dealt to the Time Patrol to herself using Time Power. I remember there was a scan a couple of pages back talking about this very feat.
- 1,351
- 1,950
Jokes aside, I'll prob add it later since I'm gonna do some fixes on Chronoa's profile anyways
- 54
- 46
- 54
- 46
When i'm free, i'll go through the SDBH manga to see if there are any abilities that we can add to Time Power. Also, i'll see if I can find anything that can give Time Power plot manipulation, on top of all the stuff we currently have regarding the Time Scrolls
- 742
- 137
- 625
- 214
He says Goku it's not even Star level
- 535
- 334
the Founder of VSBW also said that at 2010
AyOgUyS
He/Him- 2,784
- 1,108
No. Transcending is not enough. Being different in nature is not enough.
Fezzih_007
He/Him- 9,381
- 4,537
Is Dragon Ball fusions Arale, not DB Heroes.
Mbpoops
He/Him- 8,444
- 7,654
shouldnt this be updated to 7D?
- 207
- 176
Ik I was just looking at her scaling and she scales off DBH chars
- 15,210
- 22,467
DBF is a part of DBH multiverse anyway, and she actually appears in DBH
Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 10,777
- 9,664
The promotional pamphlet provided during the Toei Anime Fair of March 1993, which is where Broly - The Legendary Super Saiyan premiered.
- 30
- 11
Thanks!
- 41
- 16
Should Goku have resistance to Madness Manipulation and Fear Manipulation via being able to remain in Arale’s presence?
- 54
- 46
I have a question regarding paraconsistent physiology. Before I begin with my question, however, I want to ensure that my understanding of dualities and logical states aligns with this wiki's standards for them. From my studies of biomathematics and biophysics, I understand that a duality is any system where two opposing concepts are defined in terms of each other, and together they are meant to be exhaustive and mutually exclusive. What this means is that for concepts A and not-A, three essential rules must be obeyed, where you cannot be both A and not-A at once; everything must fall into one or the other; and each concept only has meaning in relation to its opposite. From what I have read of this wiki's standards, this is the way they treat a duality operating under classical logic, which aligns with my understanding.
An important nuance about classical logic-operating dualities is that there are at least two different forms: logical/formal and substantive/ontological. Using the concepts of creation and destruction, I am going to explain the difference between these two forms. A logical/formal duality is defined as a duality that is generated purely by the structure of negation itself; this would be creation and not-creation. Not-creation is defined as simply everything that is not "creation". It has no independent identity or content of its own, meaning it is entirely parasitic on "creation" for its definition. It is just the complement set: the reality of all things, minus creation. A substantive/ontological duality, on the other hand, is defined as a duality where both terms have rich and independent content; this would be creation and destruction. Destruction doesn't just mean the absence of creation. It is an active force, process, or principle with its own nature, which is the unmaking of things, the return to nothingness, and annihilation. You could give a full account of what destruction is without ever mentioning creation, and yet, the two are deeply interdependent in a way that goes beyond mere logical negation. For example, creation presupposes something that can be destroyed; but if nothing could be unmade, what would it mean to make something? Additionally, destruction presupposes something that was created, but you cannot destroy what never existed. They define a cycle together, giving the other meaning and stakes, where neither term is simply the shadow of the other.
In this wiki, the page for paraconsistent physiology portrays logical/formal and substantive/ontological dualities as synonymous, when they are not. Essentially, my question is: how do we distinguish between and take into account these two forms of dualities when analyzing feats?
An important nuance about classical logic-operating dualities is that there are at least two different forms: logical/formal and substantive/ontological. Using the concepts of creation and destruction, I am going to explain the difference between these two forms. A logical/formal duality is defined as a duality that is generated purely by the structure of negation itself; this would be creation and not-creation. Not-creation is defined as simply everything that is not "creation". It has no independent identity or content of its own, meaning it is entirely parasitic on "creation" for its definition. It is just the complement set: the reality of all things, minus creation. A substantive/ontological duality, on the other hand, is defined as a duality where both terms have rich and independent content; this would be creation and destruction. Destruction doesn't just mean the absence of creation. It is an active force, process, or principle with its own nature, which is the unmaking of things, the return to nothingness, and annihilation. You could give a full account of what destruction is without ever mentioning creation, and yet, the two are deeply interdependent in a way that goes beyond mere logical negation. For example, creation presupposes something that can be destroyed; but if nothing could be unmade, what would it mean to make something? Additionally, destruction presupposes something that was created, but you cannot destroy what never existed. They define a cycle together, giving the other meaning and stakes, where neither term is simply the shadow of the other.
In this wiki, the page for paraconsistent physiology portrays logical/formal and substantive/ontological dualities as synonymous, when they are not. Essentially, my question is: how do we distinguish between and take into account these two forms of dualities when analyzing feats?
Last edited:
- 14,149
- 7,407
I can't wait for Goku to unleash his Super Saiyan 4 form in the future and refute Daima's haters.
- 15,493
- 4,479
Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 10,777
- 9,664
It's officially confirmed to be a continuation of the original series, and it's officially confirmed to exist within the same worldview created and expanded upon by Toriyama. It doesn't have to be in-continuity with Super to be canon. I don't think Super: Beerus is even going to reference Daima, let alone depict Super Saiyan 4 on-screen for a 5-second-long easter egg, essentially, but it doesn't have to for the series to be canon—which it is.Then what will our "logical explanation" be for how it's canon?
- 15,493
- 4,479
I was referring to super canon when I said that
Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 10,777
- 9,664
It's all the same canon, officially, just with minor differences here and there.
- 299
- 83
- 14,149
- 7,407
My Twitter handle was in Brazilian Portuguese, I thought it would automatically translate for you.Why you had to get this from a hebrew source Luffy?
- 742
- 137
Guys, do Kami-sama have soul manipulation on wiki and others who are stronger than him have soul manipulation resistance?
AyOgUyS
He/Him- 2,784
- 1,108
Don't we currently accept that Ki itself inherently has soul manipulation?
- 555
- 485
IIRC no. I’m pretty sure it was removed not that long ago and AFAIK it has soul NPI and soul vision but nothing more than that.
AyOgUyS
He/Him- 2,784
- 1,108
- 322
- 140
There is actually nothing that suggests time power has plot manipulation you would be making things up.
- 54
- 46
I seem to recall Chronoa describing the texts within the Time Scrolls as stories. While it isn't enough for plot manipulation, it does act as a basis/foundation for it. I'm currently going through XV and SDBH to see if I can find anything that can reinforce and build upon this foundation.
- 2,259
- 1,078
Calc Group Discussion: The Issue with Dragon Ball's Planetary Calculations
The Core of the Issue: Currently, we use Champa's statement regarding the Super Dragon Balls being "almost as big as a planet" as the basis for a lot of our DBZ planet calculations. However, the raw line is: 本物はスケールが違う 1つが星ほどのサイズだ! "願い星" といってもいい大きさ! どんな願いも叶う! いわば "超ドラゴンボール" だ!!! The real...
- 14,149
- 7,407
Calc Group Discussion: The Issue with Dragon Ball's Planetary Calculations
The Core of the Issue: Currently, we use Champa's statement regarding the Super Dragon Balls being "almost as big as a planet" as the basis for a lot of our DBZ planet calculations. However, the raw line is: 本物はスケールが違う 1つが星ほどのサイズだ! "願い星" といってもいい大きさ! どんな願いも叶う! いわば "超ドラゴンボール" だ!!! The real...vsbattles.com
This is one of those downgrades based on translation kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
MichaelCalistro
He/Him- 767
- 121
Mayday! This fight has not ended yet!
- 535
- 334
I agree with a few things, but the number of CRTs opened for DB downgrades in the last month, and the fact that the same people keep appearing suddenly, doesn't seem like a coincidenceCalc Group Discussion: The Issue with Dragon Ball's Planetary Calculations
The Core of the Issue: Currently, we use Champa's statement regarding the Super Dragon Balls being "almost as big as a planet" as the basis for a lot of our DBZ planet calculations. However, the raw line is: 本物はスケールが違う 1つが星ほどのサイズだ! "願い星" といってもいい大きさ! どんな願いも叶う! いわば "超ドラゴンボール" だ!!! The real...
Similar threads
