Fezzih_007
He/Him- 9,381
- 4,537
What, you lying before?Alright, I will be honest about this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What, you lying before?Alright, I will be honest about this.
What, you lying before?
Iirc I think people do thatThat's like trying to eat a hamburger with chopsticks...
canon
Alright, I will be honest about this.
Why do you guys think you can apply concepts like "Canon" to Japanese, Korean and other non-Western medias?.
Viewing the continuity of DB through Western lences is incredibly wrong and arrogant.
This is literally insulting the creator and imposing Cultural supremacism.
They do not share YOUR views in regards what's part of the continuity and what's not.
Everytime I heard the word canon, it makes me sick.
I'm starting to find that Word repulsive.
I see where you're coming from, and I agree that it's important to recognize the cultural context of a work, especially when it comes from a different tradition or country. Dragon Ball, for example, was created within a Japanese framework, and its storytelling doesn't always adhere to the same structure or ideas that we might expect in Western media.
That said, I think it's worth considering that fans around the world—whether in Japan, the U.S., or elsewhere—will often bring their own perspectives to a work. The concept of 'Canon' itself isn't inherently Western. It’s a term that has become widely used in fan communities everywhere, as people engage with fictional universes and try to organize and make sense of the material. It helps fans distinguish what's considered official from what's not, and while it might not be an entirely perfect fit for every cultural context, it's not inherently disrespectful to the original creators.
Also, creators like Akira Toriyama have acknowledged that continuity in Dragon Ball can be a bit flexible at times. For example, the inclusion of movies or non-canon material has often been more about fan service or exploring alternate possibilities, rather than sticking rigidly to a singular ‘canon’. So, I don't think that applying the concept of canon to Dragon Ball is necessarily imposing a Western lens, but rather engaging in a global fan culture that wants to understand the official scope of a work.
At the end of the day, it’s a balance between respecting the creator's intent and recognizing how the fandom interprets and engages with the material. It’s not about imposing cultural supremacy, but about understanding and enjoying the work from a variety of perspectives.
Iirc I think people do that
Not sure If this point works.
There’s literally nothing wrong with thisThat's like trying to eat a hamburger with chopsticks...
I know, I saying people do that.I meant real, typical American hamburgers with all the bread and the stuff.
Not just the meat
Nothing wrong with it, yeah.There’s literally nothing wrong with this
Again...I gotta disagree, everyone can understand the concept of continuity between two things. Like if you wanna say it’s 1 way, or just not continuous, that’s still interacting with the idea of a canon. It’s how things have sequels.
Then that makes it canon… Just becuase the canon is stupid doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Look at comicsMany Japanese mangakas have connected works from the same franchise even with contradictions.
Maybe.Then that makes it canon… Just becuase the canon is stupid doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Look at comics
Obviously you can try to determine it.Even if DB has a loose canon, that doesn’t mean you can’t try to determine what is in it, or what specifically is informing the history of Super.
And besides, that doesn’t necessarily apply to everyone
Yeah you are alright.I see. Even if that’s the case, people are still free to interpret and interact with media as they want. Especially here, all that it really takes is for others to agree. If a given canon made no sense if we took the creators word seriously, ignoring them would be a real option Imo. Or just go with it ig
This is literally insulting the creator and imposing Cultural supremacism.
That's true, however, that doesn't necessairly apply only to non-western authorsThey do not share YOUR views in regards what's part of the continuity and what's not.
Regarding the "Author VS Fandom" topic.... I think we should take in account more of what the franchise shows rather than what the author says tbh
Yup,Let's say for example a major breaking plothole in a guide, saying Goku's SSJ form in the DBZ Anime is Pink, while in the Anime is yellow, obviously the Anime hould take precendence.
The thing is: While there ins't a defined timeline, the fact two interpretations of the same story (Considering the DBZ Anime and Manga as an example) take significantly different routes on it's storytelling give us (As fans) a reason to discern the franchise into two continuitiesBut if the guide is talking about inter-continuity stuff, we have no reason to deny it, even with Major contradictions arising, there is not a defined timeline in the main show.
For example Garlick Jr being a thing in the DBZ Anime at all, despite that same filler being a continuation from the film and contradicting Anime stuff, authors simply didn't care.
The story is in their heads, and they can always twist it and place it in, somehow.
It never has been something rare at all tbhBesides a series having plotholes is not a rare thing these days....
@TiltedFNAccording to Toriyama, ki as a concept is made of spiritual powers named "genki", courage "yuko" and right-mindness "shoki". Ki is formless , shapeless and is invisible. Everyone in Dragon Ball has ki and is a fundamental energy that humans are made/comprised of (their identities). With proper training one can control its power. It also shows for example who they are, reflects their hearts, their identities, and if they are evil or not. Genki which is part of ki, is in everything, from grass, trees, people, animals, atmosphere, inanimate objects that aren't even alive, suns, and of course the earth itself, thus everything in and the universe itself has Genki. Genki is also the "hope" of that persons genki. Ki shapes depends on the user and reflects their hearths. Ki by itself would have Non existence physiology (Nature 1 & possibly 2. Aspect of existence 1,3 & 4) , since it is invisible, shapeless and formless, yet is the fundamental energy that humans are made and comprised of and is still paradoxically there
No this is wrongBeing shapeless and formless equals Incorporeality,
Correct, essentially.While there ins't a defined timeline, the fact two interpretations of the same story (Considering the DBZ Anime and Manga as an example) take significantly different routes on it's storytelling give us (As fans) a reason to discern the franchise into two continuities
mfw lacking a corporeal form doesn't grant you incorporealityNo this is wrong
Incorporeality and phantasmal intagibility it's almost the same thing, dunno why people separate it...mfw lacking a corporeal form doesn't grant you incorporeality
What?mfw lacking a corporeal form doesn't grant you incorporeality
Hey don't be rude to null he is just highWhat?
He is free from this hellThis thread entered the dump the moment our Lord Hades left
And once departed this Underworld he created collapsed into absolute nothingness.He is free from this hell
His soul is in ElysiumAnd once departed this Underworld he created collapsed into absolute nothingness.
To what, skin cells?? Surface wiping is sub raditz level stuff
Did you read what they're replying to?What?