Yes, and I'm saying writers do not always care about consistency. Just that. Powerscaling is a subjective matter, but offical statements should also be taken into account in regards specific contexts like timeline stuff. One can disagree with that logic, but that also falls under the umbrella of subjectivity aswell. So in my point of view, instead of trying to apply my own conclusions, I rather listen to official sources in contexts like this.
Toei/Chozenshu already considers both to be connected. Regardless.....
Neither Toriyama always cared, he always forgot things and retconned them, look at Daima's mess. But wherether we like it or not, their words are above ours.If Toei don't care about consistency, they words means nothing then
Ignoring the obvious response to this, can you just say what's your point in all this?
Sure, but in the wiki there are many things accepted (for many verses) despite the contradictions using the guides. So if we accept one case, all of them should follow by default.
If they don’t care about consistency then why bring them up at all (also they do to an extent) it’s weird how you subside the opinions of anyone else with a more rationale explanation, using the primary source material, and instead adhere to authors (a secondary source) who supposedly never care about the consistency of their stories
The issue becomes more complex now. Yeah, we can always try and give them a more rational explanation. However, we have to bare in mind they also have the power to flip the script whenever they want, after all, the story is more in their head than anything else, that's how retcons happen and all, nothing is set on stone. Daima is a clear example of how many inconsistencies can arise within the main series. They obviously care about consistency to a degree (obviously), but not to the same extent as we do, atleast not in regards what is canon or not. This is also a more common phenomena in the Western world than everywhere else. At the end of the day, our interpretation, while it may seen to be more "consistent" from the outside, we are also entering into the subjective territory at the same time, in one way or another. That's why powerscaling is very divisive, becouse you have to take either stance, whether is more officially supported than the other.
Let's agree to disagree, I guess. Btw, thanks for the respectful debate. I enjoyed it.
Thanks
We removed the Universe in bubble format; this shouldn't be used against the Infinite Universe unless there's a CRT to bring back the marble-shaped cosmology.
Right so let's make a infinite size cosmology crt using just the power of family
I prob just read it somewhere, idk. Just google it to see if I’m right or wrong, idrc either way
Wdym? Not all not these are in the same canon
Ednaxel, why'd you do it?
Don't. Let it go. Not here.
The actual rating is Low 5-B+ Tilted
Yes of course
Leave the server?
Shhhh let them cook in secret
I hope low 1-C becomes real
I'd rather have immeasurable speed TBH
It's harder to prove
Kinda? (It's technically accepted, just as an outliner right now....)
Damn. Both would be peak though
I mean if Infinite size cosmology does get accepted that may help.
Maybe for toei we may get low 1-C besides there is no contradiction with high 3-A living world so
Not what he was asking, but regardless, you're no longer allowed back jsyk.
Cool what was he asking
