- 3,333
- 3,802
Not that it's scale to anyone though.it might work then,for range only.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not that it's scale to anyone though.it might work then,for range only.
In DBH, guys can destroy infinite timelines, right? Hence 2-A.
But what about when each timeline turns Low 1-C? Power to destroy infinite Low 1-C structures.
Would that make them infinitely above the Low 1-C baseline?
No no that's perfectly fair. It is a leading question. It's also good that he doesn't deny it also, but yeah nothing beyond that.I'm not talking about infinite universes or whatever, I'm speaking broadly.
Also he is responding to a question asking if he'll is infinite, a leading question, a fan question, after stating his stuff to be opinions, you can see why I'm sceptical.
WowGeorredannea has done it first!
![]()
Re:evulation of temporal dimension standards
Alr, here we go! I'd like to mention that I obtained permission from @Qawsedf234 🙏 This structure can then be generalized to any number of dimensions, which is why destroying a spacetime continuum is a greater feat than destroying only the contents of the physical universe (Low 2-C, rather...vsbattles.com
Was good while it lasted.Georredannea has done it first!
![]()
Re:evulation of temporal dimension standards
Alr, here we go! I'd like to mention that I obtained permission from @Qawsedf234 🙏 This structure can then be generalized to any number of dimensions, which is why destroying a spacetime continuum is a greater feat than destroying only the contents of the physical universe (Low 2-C, rather...vsbattles.com
Basically, time dimensions are different from spatial dimensions, a universal sized spacetime would be low 2-C because it contains a universe for each and every single moment of time across past, present, and future, which would be uncountably infinite. Which is why low 2-C is infinitely greater than 3-A. Because its like destroying a universe an uncountably infinite amount of times over.Well after reading the thread and CRT i'm still confused.
Before I start saying Tier 1 Dragonball, I want to fully understand it in the way I could explain it to my grandma.
I thought an infinite amount of universes existing in a higher spatial dimension is considered 5D. Destroying said higher dimension would be tier 1. Why are twelve macrocosms with all different temporal axis existing in a timeline considered tier 1? Is it because the timeline is a higher spatial dimension that can contain different temporal axis, regardless of how many universes fit in the timeline?
It's not for the DB. I mean not with that intent.This is what? The 5th time a wiki wide change has been done to avoid an upgrade?
Basically a Universe is 4D due to having its 3D size + a temporal dimension with uncountable snapshots since it’s uncountably bigger it’s 4DWell after reading the thread and CRT i'm still confused.
Before I start saying Tier 1 Dragonball, I want to fully understand it in the way I could explain it to my grandma.
I thought an infinite amount of universes existing in a higher spatial dimension is considered 5D. Destroying said higher dimension would be tier 1. Why are twelve macrocosms with all different temporal axis existing in a timeline considered tier 1? Is it because the timeline is a higher spatial dimension that can contain different temporal axis, regardless of how many universes fit in the timeline?
HOW DID I NOT SEE THIS until I posted mineBasically, time dimensions are different from spatial dimensions, a universal sized spacetime would be low 2-C because it contains a universe for each and every single moment of time across past, present, and future, which would be uncountably infinite. Which is why low 2-C is infinitely greater than 3-A. Because its like destroying a universe an uncountably infinite amount of times over.
For a Higher temporal dimension, it would contain snapshots of low 2-C structures instead of 3-A structures, but this doesn't happen if a universe doesn't have a distinct time axis. But if they do, the higher timeline would be comprised of an uncountably infinite amount of low 2-C structures, which is low 1-C.
Permission first.aw hell naw, let me get over there
It's a shame this isn't accepted, even though he's talking about Toei
He responded with his opinion when he said this and not as a director, he explains this in one of his comments.Koyama is the same guy who said that Otherworld is 7D at least and that there is an infinite hierarchy of dimensions among worlds, that Z Broly is the strongest villain besides Beerus I think and that his statements are only his opinions
Even if Toei got an infinite universe, that statement won't be usable.
Georredannea has done it first!
![]()
Re:evulation of temporal dimension standards
Alr, here we go! I'd like to mention that I obtained permission from @Qawsedf234 🙏 This structure can then be generalized to any number of dimensions, which is why destroying a spacetime continuum is a greater feat than destroying only the contents of the physical universe (Low 2-C, rather...vsbattles.com
Koyama is the same guy who said that Otherworld is 7D at least and that there is an infinite hierarchy of dimensions among worlds, that Z Broly is the strongest villain besides Beerus I think and that his statements are only his opinions
Even if Toei got an infinite universe, that statement won't be usable.
Time for the guy to get folded like a paper sheet.Is this like the 6th or 7th time this has happened?
No, goodbye tier 1 and hello tier 2Anyway better be soon, as per Qawsed, if dealt now, will be done for 3 months next.
LmaoNo, goodbye tier 1 and hello tier 2![]()
Anyway better be soon, as per Qawsed, if dealt now, will be done for 3 months next.
The guy's been warned on both the Dragon Ball thread and the Ben 10 one. It's pretty explicit.When you change tier 1 standards the same day DB tier 1 gets accepted there isn't much room for 'oh this isn't out of spite'
This is cowardice, the guy spent the entire time disturbing the Ben 10 and DB thread, now it says it's not personal '-'Lmao
If we report him?The guy's been warned on both the Dragon Ball thread and the Ben 10 one. It's pretty explicit.
Nah, don't. It's not worth it.If we report him?