Killerdrone123
He/Him- 2,751
- 2,808
Yes sleep tightCan I go to bed? Do you all have this on lock?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes sleep tightCan I go to bed? Do you all have this on lock?
Reiner have you understood anything from the staff thread? How is it going?I believe that reconfirmation of those who participated in the thread would be better with a new draft of DT, will save us a trouble of creating new thread. Also that they are aware of what thread has talked about.
DT ain't going to come to read 12 pages.
Serlock doesn't know, chat.Reiner have you understood anything from the staff thread? How is it going?
Not much different than before, if anything, it solidifies DB even more.Reiner have you understood anything from the staff thread? How is it going?
Really? Because profectus raised the issue of the universes that zeno erased not existing in the new timeline. I'm talking about the 6 that were erased some time before. In the end it's not a problem?Not much different than before, if anything, it solidifies DB even more.
What???Serlock doesn't know, chat.
It's not a problem, I was just saying that I don't think we can use the fact that there were more universes in the past as supporting evidence without a feat of someone traveling back to when there were more universes.Really? Because profectus raised the issue of the universes that zeno erased not existing in the new timeline. I'm talking about the 6 that were erased some time before. In the end it's not a problem?
Don't worry too much about it.What???
So we likely good? Even the single overarching timeline qualifies?It's not a problem, I was just saying that I don't think we can use the fact that there were more universes in the past as supporting evidence without a feat of someone traveling back to when there were more universes.
Theoretically yes.So we likely good? Even the single overarching timeline qualifies?
From what I am seeing dt comments solidifies our caseSo we likely good? Even the single overarching timeline qualifies?
The staff we tagged are mostly asleep I'm guessing, so we're waiting for them to wake up and check the blog out.Well, what should we do now? Are we waiting for the low 1-C to be finished or....?
Waiting for the reconfirmed stance of all those who previously agreed after DT's recent draft.Well, what should we do now? Are we waiting for the low 1-C to be finished or....?
Who knows. All we should care about is what DT has wrote, that's safest thing to do.What does Georr's latest message mean?
I'm just tired of this back and forth.Who knows. All we should care about is what DT has wrote, that's safest thing to do.
DT just talking about when you don't have confirmation of 2 different time dimensions but just 2 time dimensions. Former qualifies, latter after some mental gymnastics.I would like to see the point countered.
Thats what happens when the tiering system is made by two people.I want 5D to be rock solid but right now all the fuss os based on the opinion of one mod who isn't even in the thread. It's frustrating as ****, just a game of telephone/ he said she said.
I don't see anything wrong with that. Given i have seen more times than i can count.That pfp
As i said, everything is fine.That pfp though![]()
My heart isn't fineAs i said, everything is fine.
That pfp was meant to attack it anyway.My heart isn't fine![]()
Oh like the girl I liked insulting me. I see I see!That pfp was meant to attack it anyway.