- 22,686
- 23,263
It's part of the canon page:Well, everyone has their own opinion about the reliability of this source(I've talked to people who don't consider Daizenshu to be a canon because it contains contradictions and wasn't written by Toriyama). But why it can't be used as valid source for wiki?
Ultimately on the site it's a third tier canon document with multiple stated issues regarding canonicity and Mike Pondsmith/RA having to introduce justifications for different concepts.In addition a tertiary canon will be allowed. The tertiary canon consists of official adaptations not overseen by the author, which do not modify or contradict source material. When other source materials give different versions of the same feat, and by that contradict the tertiary canon in the depiction of the feat, the others take precedence. And here as well, if the feat is correctly depicted over multiple canons any of these can be used to judge the feat. Should by judging the feat through primary or secondary canon a different result be reached than for tertiary canon the result of primary or secondary canon will have priority.
- Entirely new feats of tertiary canon, like for example new abilities, should be disregarded. Details added to existing fight scenes, such as damage caused to the surroundings, can be accepted for text based media like books.
- Any changes based on tertiary canon will only be accepted if they are not contradicted by any instances of another canon, with regards to either the character power-scale, or logical inconsistencies (and plot holes).
- All of the rules that are written in the Cinematic Time page still apply when it comes to evaluation of such tertiary canon feats.
I wouldn't say its entirely unusable, but the upgrades you're attempting to pursue with it is going to run into issues with site standards.