• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Ajeel Ramal Circular Reasoning

Damage3245

He/Him
VS Battles
Administrator
Calculation Group
29,778
24,815
I've noticed a bit of circular reasoning on Ajeel's durability:

Durability: At least Mountain level (Took multiples hits from Erza, was still able to reflect blasts from the Jupiter cannon even while injured)

Erza's justification for her AP is:

Attack Potency: At least Mountain level (Fought and Damaged Ajeel Ramal. Overpowered Neinhart's Historia of the Dead)

Jupiter Canno's justification for its AP is:

Attack Potency: Likely Mountain level (Damaged Ajeel Ramal, but the latter was offguard and damaged from his fight with Erza, as he Previously blocked the shot with one hand only. Should be stronger than Lucy)

So Erza and Jupiter Cannon are both Likely/At least Mountain level for damaging Ajeel (among other reasons) but the only reasons given for why Ajeel is that durability is for taking hits from Erxa and Jupiter Cannon.

Since they have other reasons for their AP, the mention of Ajeel on their profiles right now is just circular.
 
Just put in his justification being comparable to other spriggan, that's not Irene or August. Or remove his reasoning for Durability as I've seen profiles that only have a reasoning for AP.
 
Every profile ought to have something justifying each of the ratings. The absence of that just means the article is written poorly.
 
Back
Top