- 935
- 575
Being "beyond dimensionality" or "transcending the concept of dimensions" doesn't inherently warrant 1-A either, yeah?Me and Umy have already said this, sure in Platonism, specifically timaeus and book 6 of the republic, we are told forms are beyond dimensionality, and have eternal and "perfect and absolute properties", but in fiction they are almost never represented this way, which is part of why we just got rid of the naming for that kind of concept. Period, point blank, you prove how extensive they are verse to verse, you don't automatically get 1-A for mentioning them much less if you adapt them to particular rules.