• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Additional stuff

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
92
Reaction score
158
Some quick additions, starting with Anos's Source of Destruction:



that's one thing down, now the next for Venuzdonoa:

these will be updated accordingly in its notes:


Agree: @Oblivion_Of_The_Endless, @Dereck03, @DarkDragonMedeus

Neutral:

Disagree:

And that's all, have a lovely day/night!
 
Last edited:
Thats not invulnerability,more like casuality manipulation
It's invulnerability via logic manipulation and causality manipulation. Invulnerability is the negation of physical attacks through a given mechanism (hax), which is what happened there. Venuz is using hax to prevent Sasha from being affected by physical attacks that have reached her.
 
It's invulnerability via logic manipulation and causality manipulation. Invulnerability is the negation of physical attacks through a given mechanism (hax), which is what happened there. Venuz is using hax to prevent Sasha from being affected by physical attacks that have reached her.
If a character uses casuality manipulation to destroy a attack that already slashed them,does the wiki counts it as just casuality manipulation or invulnerability?
If it's the latter then i agree with the proposal
 
If a character uses casuality manipulation to destroy a attack that already slashed them,does the wiki counts it as just casuality manipulation or invulnerability?
If it's the latter then i agree with the proposal
The difference between something like Giorno's Gold Experience Requiem and Sasha's venuzdonoa is that the former actively interacts with the enemy's attacks and prevents them from reaching the user's body, while the latter is focused on the user's own body to negate the effect of attacks that did connect to the body. The first is purely hax while the second is invulnerability.

Kostoria's attack wasnt even reverted or undone, it remained true, it just didn't cause any effect on Sasha's body.
 
Last edited:
....

How did that get accepted in the first place?
Traces are information and are directly compared to data
Traces are order and order is the thing that defines the world
Changing the traces changes the world
Edit: Just noticed that the God of Traces is missing info2 on his AE1. This should be added in another crt
 
For someone who's particularly obsessed with info, you seem to have openly chose to not look at the scans that is linked in the justification.
Well atleast information in Maou doesn't have mass. Some people worrying about other verses abilities when their verse itself has faulty stuff. Well not derail this further

Anyway agree with the thread.
 
Gah damn.. about time


Should be enough votes now, yes? If so, can one of yall unlock the following profiles?:




edit: changes have been applied, this can be closed now
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top