- 1,312
- 998
Zero way that second to last new message is real 
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
are we fr getting a vsbw version of Burger King customers placing their orders while in McDonaldZero way that second to last new message is real![]()
Firstly the OP itself is attempting to regurgitate an argument that has been thoroughly addressed and rejected. The entire foundation/premise of the thread prior to the edit was a mere reiteration of something that was rejected in an earlier CRT by the likes of @Mr. Bambu (Comment)It is stated in both the novel and the manga that he transcends everything and that nothing exists beyond him, and it is also mentioned that things like fate and plot are nothing more than a joke in his presence.
As far as I know you are correct about that but again Japanese is a language where the interpretation relies on the entire text as such nitpicking and isolating words and arguing isn't really the best.Looks okay at first glance.
筋書き“Sugijaki” does indeed means Plot/Script.
This is something completely different. I opened a topic to add plot manipulation resistance, not to restore plot manipulation.
This has not been debunked at all. What was debunked is his plot manipulation, not plot manipulation resistance.
Plot manipulation has no relation to resistance to plot manipulation.
The text in the thread is very clear—fate and plot are two different things, and both the novel and the manga clearly distinguish between them, so enough with this argument.
I don’t understand what plot manipulation has to do with resistance to plot manipulation.
Haha, I’ve literally started going crazy because of these comments.
Plot manipulation is one thing, and resistance to plot manipulation is something completely different.
A character doesn’t need to possess plot manipulation to have resistance to it.
The text states that the plot is nothing more than a joke in front of him, and the novel clearly distinguishes between fate and plot—both in the manga and the novel—so I don’t understand these comments at all.
I agree with resisting nep plot.
Somehow this has been the best argument and it doesn't even qualify for Plot Manipulation.It’s implied that Yogiri has the ability to erase the Q&A Corner.
Q: Dear Mr. Yogiri. In order to add some more fanservice, could I request
that you kill the clothes of the person sitting next to you? Also, if you were to
use your power to kill the Question Corner, what would happen to the next
bonus section?
Yogiri: Even if I killed Dannoura’s clothes, it’s not like there would be an
insert image for it...
Tomochika: So you would do it if there were?!
yogiri: I’m joking.
Tomochika: So, what about killing the Question Corner, then? I don't really
understand the question, but go ahead.
Yogiri: It would just mean there’s no Question Corner next time, wouldn’t it?
Mokomoko: Such a thing would be rather troubling for us!
Tomochika: We need something for these side stories, so please don’t do it!Tomochika: We’re going to be in an anime! One that you can actually
watch on TV!
Mokomoko: Did you really need to specify that part?
Tomochika: Being on TV is really important!
Yogiri: Is there anything for us to actually talk about for the anime, though?
Mokomoko: Yes, just like the Question Corners, we are once again
broadcasting from a mysterious space outside that of the main novels!
Tomochika: That means we know quite a bit about the anime.
Yogiri: But even if we know, that doesn’t mean we can share much.
Tomochika: I don’t know. Can we talk about, like, who the voice actors
will be?
Mokomoko: By the way, my voice actor will be the illustrious so-and-so!
Tomochika: If you’re not going to actually say it, why did you bring it up
at all?!
Yogiri: It’s probably obvious, but there isn’t really anything we can say at
this point.
Mokomoko: The most we can say is that such and such important
characters will be voiced by so-and-so!
Tomochika: You still didn’t tell us anything!
Yogiri: What about the broadcast date?
Mokomoko: We can say nothing!
Tomochika: So there’s actually nothing for us to tell them!
Mokomoko: More information should be available in the middle of 2023,
so until then there is nothing we can say!
Yogiri: What about how much of the story it’s going to cover?
Mokomoko: Of course, we can say nothing on that front either!
Tomochika: Then what’s the point of this “TV Anime Announcement
Space” anyway?!
If the page failed to make it explicitly clear that Plot Manipulation is reserved for users that can manipulate Plot in a verse where Plot is a fundamental aspect that determines reality then I shall reiterate that again by directly quoting the Plot Manipulation Page itself.
Tomochika: So, what about killing the Question Corner, then? I don't really
understand the question, but go ahead.
Yogiri: It would just mean there’s no Question Corner next time, wouldn’t it?
Mokomoko: Such a thing would be rather troubling for us!
Tomochika: We need something for these side stories, so please don’t do it!
Now let's list some similar cases like this shall we ?Yes, just like the Question Corners, we are once again
broadcasting from a mysterious space outside that of the main novels!
This is more like a gag ngl, its like kinda when deadpool came out of its story to kill its own authors or when ajimu najimi ended their author's run. idk if valid tbh
Characters often make such statements to prolong the gag but we both know that Yogiri can't meaningfully affect the Q&A section as a fictitious character. Often times many characters make such threatening statements and sometimes some even follow up but in no way are those anything beyond a fourth wall break.Not really, because Yogiri said the Q&A would end as a result of his instant death.
Now let's put this to rest shall we ?Hm... Hey, you listening to this. Well, whether you’re listening, reading, or watching, I can’t really tell. You definitely understand how dangerous it is, right? So you won’t try to fight it or anything. Could you do me a favor and make your way here, so we can be friends? Using the V Road is probably the easiest way to make it here, so that’s how I recommend you do it.
Yogiri destroying the QnA is pretty similar to:
![]()
They realise they're a character in a series
Hence breaking the fourth wall
[edit]
It's not a fallacy here, what you are describing is Whataboutism which isn't applicable here because no-one is answering anything rather people are comparing two similar cases with the similarity being relevant here and arguing via an example, if you think that's inherently fallacious you are more than welcome to debate me on that and we can let the staff decide.It is not the same thing, and using evidence from one work to another work is in itself a fallacy, just so you know.
I am sorry, what ? Do you genuinely believe that whenever a character breaks the 4th wall they enter our actual world ? In the Daily Life of the Immortal King Donghua, Wang king also went to a space outside his Donghua resembling our world as part of his story. Every fourth wall break is still inherently part of the narrative and the story that's why it's a gag.There is a difference between breaking the fourth wall and the official narrative.
Breaking the fourth wall refers to characters realizing they are fictional or being able to enter the real world, or similar clearly meta elements.
The “mysterious space” is not the real world; it is a space (a space, a space, a space—I repeated the word a million times). It is a mysterious space located outside all novels, and from this space anime, novels, and other works can be created.
It is part of the official story, not a fourth-wall break. Fourth-wall breaking is when characters enter the real world in comedic scenes or realize they are fictional characters.
This has nothing to do with the mysterious space, because it is not our real world or anything like that. It is a space outside the novels and still part of the narrative.
Note: The character Yuichi Sakaki is the protagonist of the novel Neechan wa Chuunibyou, which shares the same Fujitakaverse. This protagonist possesses plot manipulation abilities, and the events of the novel revolve around him and plot manipulation. Yuichi Sakaki is, in fact, an embodiment of the plot itself.
Plot manipulation still exists in the other novel Neechan wa Chuunibyou, and as we know, it shares the same cosmology. Yuichi Sakaki has plot manipulation—he is actually the protagonist of Neechan wa Chuunibyou. That novel is fundamentally about a protagonist who can manipulate the plot itself; in fact, he is essentially an embodiment of the plot, even an embodiment of himself.
So yes, plot manipulation still exists within the Fujitakaverse in the other novel, which means it is still a valid concept and hasn’t disappeared.
What you did was only remove plot manipulation from Aoi’s character, but in the other novel, the protagonist literally manipulates the plot and is its embodiment—the entire story revolves around that, and he can even manipulate the stories themselves.
Honestly, the concept of plot manipulation is still firmly established. All you did was remove it from Aoi’s character and assume that solved the issue, lol.
There are other characters who possess plot manipulation from another novel by the same author, and they are part of the Fujitakaverse
The issue is that it is already present in her profile. Everyone knows that Yuichi Sakaki from Neechan wa Chuunibyou has plot manipulation, and this is already stated in his profile, which is why I didn’t mention it. However, I will add this to the topic now.
Note: The character Yuichi Sakaki is the protagonist of the novel Neechan wa Chuunibyou, which shares the same Fujitakaverse. This protagonist possesses plot manipulation abilities, and the events of the novel revolve around him and plot manipulation. Yuichi Sakaki is, in fact, an embodiment of the plot itself.
I mean, there this
Here’s some information on worldview holders I was able to find on short notice.
Now these are some really compelling arguments from sukuna but they were already addressed by Dao in the previous thread which no-one bothered to read so let me paraphrase Dao once again (Poor guy leaves and everyone starts wanking)After finding a few scans, I’m leaning more neutral now. Honestly, it seems like it could be destiny, fate, or plot
"Let me see, how to explain it..." Yuri pondered."To say that it's a story is more a figure of speech...Have you ever heard of the anthropic principle?"I agree with Yogiri having Resistance to this, yeahPlot Manipulation (She is the Worldview Holder for the story of vampire and anthromorph. She barge into the story about vampires and anthromorphs and demote Takashi from his protagonist status to side character)
Speaking of that let’s finish off with some Translation stuff and arguments;Companion...
This is further proof of Plot not existing as a fundamental aspect but I assume there's some TL issue so I suggest getting Raiki to TL it.Yogiri had it because plot manipulation because Aoi's ability was thought to be like worldview holders who have Plot Manipulation from them but the author said it is not case but just a battlesong skill.
The raw does not say anything about plot in the relate part in the light novel nor in the translation like japanese raw for the manga.
It's still on the profile regardless, so he isn't completely wrong for using it.
Also I don't need to do that to argue against this CRT, what's written on the profiles isn't dogmatic or Axiomatic in any way shape or form, one can appeal to a profile yes and in order to change its contents I would need to make a CRT but I don't need to make one to nitpick every single flawed logic used in this CRT.If anyone has an objection to Yuichi Sakaki’s plot manipulation from Neechan wa Chuunibyou, they can open another topic about it
Repeat thatbro thats vzearr's sock
Well writtenAlrighty, I am back so time to address everything
Firstly the OP itself is attempting to regurgitate an argument that has been thoroughly addressed and rejected. The entire foundation/premise of the thread prior to the edit was a mere reiteration of something that was rejected in an earlier CRT by the likes of @Mr. Bambu (Comment)
@Duedate8898 (Comment)
@ActuallySpaceMan42 (Comment)
This was accepted as possibly resistance to Fate Manipulation
Now let's address the other arguments.
As far as I know you are correct about that but again Japanese is a language where the interpretation relies on the entire text as such nitpicking and isolating words and arguing isn't really the best.
It's quite natural for a new member to not understand what fundamental aspects are, what they entail and what's necessary to argue for them so I won't blame you but I really hope you stop being ignorant of the standards, and actually read them for once and then formulate an argument. If you have trouble understanding just make a Q&A and ask it or dm a mod.
Firstly let's establish something
Plot Manipulation is not the same as Resistance to Plot ManipulationHowever there's a self evident correlation between both, in order to gain Resistance to Plot Manipulation one must demonstrate feats or at least have statements describing their inherent resistance to Plot Manipulation.
What the previous thread did wasn't merely removing the Resistance to Plot Manipulation but rather removing Plot as a fundamental metaphysical aspect from the verse.Like I said before ignorance isn't a bliss, I recommend reading the contents of a thread and not just the title.
Also I am not getting the whole “Umm actually I am arguing for Resistance and not Plot Manipulation” when the Resistance was the part that got nuked
TLDR; In order to get Resistance to Plot Manipulation Plot must be established as a fundamental metaphysical aspect.
You are essentially arguing that someone resists Info-2 or CM-1 when CM-1 or Info-2 doesn't even exist in the verse, like what ?
Hence this sarcastic comment;
Somehow this has been the best argument and it doesn't even qualify for Plot Manipulation.
Let's start with defining what Plot Manipulation is because a lot of people don't understand it.
If the page failed to make it explicitly clear that Plot Manipulation is reserved for users that can manipulate Plot in a verse where Plot is a fundamental aspect that determines reality then I shall reiterate that again by directly quoting the Plot Manipulation Page itself.
So I fail to see how Yogiri being able to "kill” the Q&A section implies anything here aside from being a very explicit fourth wall break. I really hate beating up a dead horse but I have no choice before this spirals so let's actually address this feat shall we ?
The entire argument boils down to this:
Now let's list some similar cases like this shall we ?
Believe me when I tell you that this is a miniscule amount of the total number of characters that have 4th wall awareness/Break and not Plot Manipulation despite having wayy better feats and now I would like to address something.
Characters often make such statements to prolong the gag but we both know that Yogiri can't meaningfully affect the Q&A section as a fictitious character. Often times many characters make such threatening statements and sometimes some even follow up but in no way are those anything beyond a fourth wall break.
Furthermore you yourself agreed that characters in the novel have feats resembling this nature which is tantamount to saying that this is nothing more than a mere gag.
Now let's put this to rest shall we ?
It's not a fallacy here, what you are describing is Whataboutism which isn't applicable here because no-one is answering anything rather people are comparing two similar cases with the similarity being relevant here and arguing via an example, if you think that's inherently fallacious you are more than welcome to debate me on that and we can let the staff decide.
I am sorry, what ? Do you genuinely believe that whenever a character breaks the 4th wall they enter our actual world ? In the Daily Life of the Immortal King Donghua, Wang king also went to a space outside his Donghua resembling our world as part of his story. Every fourth wall break is still inherently part of the narrative and the story that's why it's a gag.
Whew that's ⅔ of everything time to finish up with the actual argument.
Now these are some really compelling arguments from sukuna but they were already addressed by Dao in the previous thread which no-one bothered to read so let me paraphrase Dao once again (Poor guy leaves and everyone starts wanking)
Quite unfortunate that the page doesn't have the outdated label and that no-one bothered to nuke this but sure I can always nuke this later…
Let's have the staff judge this and obviously for any translation issues we can summon Raiki to help clarify.
Let's address this whilst we are at it shall we ?
"Let me see, how to explain it..." Yuri pondered."To say that it's a story is more a figure of speech...Have you ever heard of the anthropic principle?"
Speaking of that let’s finish off with some Translation stuff and arguments;
This is further proof of Plot not existing as a fundamental aspect but I assume there's some TL issue so I suggest getting Raiki to TL it.
Also I don't need to do that to argue against this CRT, what's written on the profiles isn't dogmatic or Axiomatic in any way shape or form, one can appeal to a profile yes and in order to change its contents I would need to make a CRT but I don't need to make one to nitpick every single flawed logic used in this CRT.
TLDR; Plot as a metaphysical aspect doesn't exist, the statement meant to give Yogiri his resistance as pointed out by Elizhaa is under contention, Neechan wa Chuunibyou profiles are outdated and the verse having plot is under contention in the first place. The Q&A is useless. That's all I will leave it up for staff to decide.also expect a surprise for making me waste nearly an hour of my precious time
Ay, u gotta do what u gotta do to get a crt verifiedZero way that second to last new message is real![]()
Which is why I said he isn't completely wrong for using it. I mean, we're getting into technicalities here, but that shit is indeed listed on the profile.Also I don't need to do that to argue against this CRT, what's written on the profiles isn't dogmatic or Axiomatic in any way shape or form, one can appeal to a profile yes and in order to change its contents I would need to make a CRT but I don't need to make one to nitpick every single flawed logic used in this CRT.
dont ever quote my post again
I feel like you aren't getting my point, this isn't a VS battle thread, it's fine to appeal to a logic used for indexing a certain ability in a profile. I am 100% fine with that and similarly to argue against said profile or to remove said ability from said profile I would need to make a CRT. That's not what I am arguing against, I am saying that I can argue against this CRT and the logic used here without having to make another CRT. You don't need to debunk or remove abilities from another profile in order to argue against the logic presented in said profile in another CRT as far as I am aware of, especially since said profile is outdated but yea I agree no point in arguing over this.Which is why I said he isn't completely wrong for using it. I mean, we're getting into technicalities here, but that shit is indeed listed on the profile.
Derailing also disrespectful towards the OP, as far as I know there's like a thread where you can advertise your CRT's I recommend going there.Aight my bad jit. Didn't know
But why tho, why aint it okay, jst asking
Hello.image
The biggest issue is that no-one bothers reading the standards or the pages and instead flex their ignorance like it was promised to them 3000 years ago (Apologies if this sounded rude it wasn't directed towards you or anyone else in this thread)You know, I feel like the biggest issue is that everyones has a different interpretation on what "plot" constitutes.
I have also deleted several of your posts as they are off-topic.tr crts lower cortisol so I'd suggest checking it out
link
Noted, sorry...Hello.
I'm here to issue an official warning.
Please refrain from posting non-serious or disruptive comments, especially in threads like this that are already somewhat prone to getting heated, as it only worsens the discussion. You have also made a similar post before on a different thread that was removed by staff, so please stop doing this going forward.
Thank you.
Dao arguments aimed at a worldview holder aren’t usable as they come from unbeatable demon lord which is no longer cannon anymoreAlrighty, I am back so time to address everything
Firstly the OP itself is attempting to regurgitate an argument that has been thoroughly addressed and rejected. The entire foundation/premise of the thread prior to the edit was a mere reiteration of something that was rejected in an earlier CRT by the likes of @Mr. Bambu (Comment)
@Duedate8898 (Comment)
@ActuallySpaceMan42 (Comment)
This was accepted as possibly resistance to Fate Manipulation
Now let's address the other arguments.
As far as I know you are correct about that but again Japanese is a language where the interpretation relies on the entire text as such nitpicking and isolating words and arguing isn't really the best.
It's quite natural for a new member to not understand what fundamental aspects are, what they entail and what's necessary to argue for them so I won't blame you but I really hope you stop being ignorant of the standards, and actually read them for once and then formulate an argument. If you have trouble understanding just make a Q&A and ask it or dm a mod.
Firstly let's establish something
Plot Manipulation is not the same as Resistance to Plot ManipulationHowever there's a self evident correlation between both, in order to gain Resistance to Plot Manipulation one must demonstrate feats or at least have statements describing their inherent resistance to Plot Manipulation.
What the previous thread did wasn't merely removing the Resistance to Plot Manipulation but rather removing Plot as a fundamental metaphysical aspect from the verse.Like I said before ignorance isn't a bliss, I recommend reading the contents of a thread and not just the title.
Also I am not getting the whole “Umm actually I am arguing for Resistance and not Plot Manipulation” when the Resistance was the part that got nuked
TLDR; In order to get Resistance to Plot Manipulation Plot must be established as a fundamental metaphysical aspect.
You are essentially arguing that someone resists Info-2 or CM-1 when CM-1 or Info-2 doesn't even exist in the verse, like what ?
Hence this sarcastic comment;
Somehow this has been the best argument and it doesn't even qualify for Plot Manipulation.
Let's start with defining what Plot Manipulation is because a lot of people don't understand it.
If the page failed to make it explicitly clear that Plot Manipulation is reserved for users that can manipulate Plot in a verse where Plot is a fundamental aspect that determines reality then I shall reiterate that again by directly quoting the Plot Manipulation Page itself.
So I fail to see how Yogiri being able to "kill” the Q&A section implies anything here aside from being a very explicit fourth wall break. I really hate beating up a dead horse but I have no choice before this spirals so let's actually address this feat shall we ?
The entire argument boils down to this:
Now let's list some similar cases like this shall we ?
Believe me when I tell you that this is a miniscule amount of the total number of characters that have 4th wall awareness/Break and not Plot Manipulation despite having wayy better feats and now I would like to address something.
Characters often make such statements to prolong the gag but we both know that Yogiri can't meaningfully affect the Q&A section as a fictitious character. Often times many characters make such threatening statements and sometimes some even follow up but in no way are those anything beyond a fourth wall break.
Furthermore you yourself agreed that characters in the novel have feats resembling this nature which is tantamount to saying that this is nothing more than a mere gag.
Now let's put this to rest shall we ?
It's not a fallacy here, what you are describing is Whataboutism which isn't applicable here because no-one is answering anything rather people are comparing two similar cases with the similarity being relevant here and arguing via an example, if you think that's inherently fallacious you are more than welcome to debate me on that and we can let the staff decide.
I am sorry, what ? Do you genuinely believe that whenever a character breaks the 4th wall they enter our actual world ? In the Daily Life of the Immortal King Donghua, Wang king also went to a space outside his Donghua resembling our world as part of his story. Every fourth wall break is still inherently part of the narrative and the story that's why it's a gag.
Whew that's ⅔ of everything time to finish up with the actual argument.
Now these are some really compelling arguments from sukuna but they were already addressed by Dao in the previous thread which no-one bothered to read so let me paraphrase Dao once again (Poor guy leaves and everyone starts wanking)
Quite unfortunate that the page doesn't have the outdated label and that no-one bothered to nuke this but sure I can always nuke this later…
Let's have the staff judge this and obviously for any translation issues we can summon Raiki to help clarify.
Let's address this whilst we are at it shall we ?
"Let me see, how to explain it..." Yuri pondered."To say that it's a story is more a figure of speech...Have you ever heard of the anthropic principle?"
Speaking of that let’s finish off with some Translation stuff and arguments;
This is further proof of Plot not existing as a fundamental aspect but I assume there's some TL issue so I suggest getting Raiki to TL it.
Also I don't need to do that to argue against this CRT, what's written on the profiles isn't dogmatic or Axiomatic in any way shape or form, one can appeal to a profile yes and in order to change its contents I would need to make a CRT but I don't need to make one to nitpick every single flawed logic used in this CRT.
TLDR; Plot as a metaphysical aspect doesn't exist, the statement meant to give Yogiri his resistance as pointed out by Elizhaa is under contention, Neechan wa Chuunibyou profiles are outdated and the verse having plot is under contention in the first place. The Q&A is useless. That's all I will leave it up for staff to decide.also expect a surprise for making me waste nearly an hour of my precious time
Even if they aren't usable, As pointed out by Elizhaa the very statement that gives Yogiri this resistance is under contention, furthermore I see no evidence within the works of instant Death that establishes Plot as a Metaphysical aspect. Not only that even in the Neechan wa Chuunibyou series I am looking at quotes that seems to contradict plot being a Metaphysical aspect let alone establish it and even then Aoi isn't a worldview holder so I fail to see the argument behind Yogiri getting Resistance to Plot Manipulation.Dao arguments aimed at a worldview holder aren’t usable as they come from unbeatable demon lord which is no longer cannon anymore
I mean, Yuichi can survive a nuke despite being only human in terms of durability because he’s the protagonist, and even if the protagonist goes up against someone at a star level, they still have a chance of winning due to being protagonist.Even if they aren't usable, As pointed out by Elizhaa the very statement that gives Yogiri this resistance is under contention, furthermore I see no evidence within the works of instant Death that establishes Plot as a Metaphysical aspect. Not only that even in the Neechan wa Chuunibyou series I am looking at quotes that seems to contradict plot being a Metaphysical aspect let alone establish it and even then Aoi isn't a worldview holder so I fail to see the argument behind Yogiri getting Resistance to Plot Manipulation.
This sounds like medaka box levels of writingI mean, Yuichi can survive a nuke despite being only human in terms of durability because he’s the protagonist, and even if the protagonist goes up against someone at a star level, they still have a chance of winning due to being protagonist.
That doesn't mean that it's plot Manipulation and not Fate Manipulation or something like Supernatural luck(Look at looney Tunes characters) although if you argue Plot Manipulation just for this guy then I would be able to see it, I wouldn't necessarily agree but arguing that Yogiri somehow gains resistance because of this contradicts him having plot Manipulation. Also keep in mind that Plot is a metaphysical aspect just like CM-1 or Info-2 which requires extensive evidence.I mean, Yuichi can survive a nuke despite being only human in terms of durability because he’s the protagonist, and even if the protagonist goes up against someone at a star level, they still have a chance of winning due to being protagonist.
Call me silly if this sounds dumb, but if Yogiri can kill anyone in the Fujitakaverse, that should include Yuichi, even though he’s protected by plot.That doesn't mean that it's plot Manipulation and not Fate Manipulation or something like Supernatural luck(Look at looney Tunes characters) although if you argue Plot Manipulation just for this guy then I would be able to see it, I wouldn't necessarily agree but arguing that Yogiri somehow gains resistance because of this contradicts him having plot Manipulation. Also keep in mind that Plot is a metaphysical aspect just like CM-1 or Info-2 which requires extensive evidence.
That's a leap in reasoning then because when Plot isn't established as fundamental but rather more akin to Fate, Yogiri is stated to be the end of all Fate with Plot explicitly not being mentionedCall me silly if this sounds dumb, but if Yogiri can kill anyone in the Fujitakaverse, that should include Yuichi, even though he’s protected by plot.
The destination where all fates arrive beyond that point, there is nothing
Against such a being, things like fate or scenario are not even worth being called nonsense
Then I am more inclined to believe that it's just standard Fate Manipulation from the Main Character and Yogiri as a result of being the end of all Fates can kill him. Seems like the most coherent reasoning and exactly the conclusion established in the prior thread.It was the destination where all fates arrive,
plot might be out the window, but his translation does support my opinion on Yogiri Nep, though that’s a topic for another time.That's a leap in reasoning then because when Plot isn't established as fundamental but rather more akin to Fate, Yogiri is stated to be the end of all Fate with Plot explicitly not being mentioned
Then I am more inclined to believe that it's just standard Fate Manipulation from the Main Character and Yogiri as a result of being the end of all Fates can kill him. Seems like the most coherent reasoning and exactly the conclusion established in the prior thread.
Since worldview holder is fate based and the power of fate manipulation can control causality, does that mean fate and causality are intertwined?That's a leap in reasoning then because when Plot isn't established as fundamental but rather more akin to Fate, Yogiri is stated to be the end of all Fate with Plot explicitly not being mentioned
Then I am more inclined to believe that it's just standard Fate Manipulation from the Main Character and Yogiri as a result of being the end of all Fates can kill him. Seems like the most coherent reasoning and exactly the conclusion established in the prior thread.
This is incorrect. The discussion was intended to remove Plot Manipulation from Yogiri. The issue is not here; the real issue is that the text explicitly states that things like fate and plot are nothing more than a joke in front of him. Ignoring the context and assuming that “plot” equals “fate” is a clear denial of both concepts and effectively dismisses and misrepresents the author’s intent, since the author distinguishes between plot and fate. If they meant the same thing, there would be no need to mention both separately every time. Again, the arguments are different.Alrighty, I am back so time to address everything
Firstly the OP itself is attempting to regurgitate an argument that has been thoroughly addressed and rejected. The entire foundation/premise of the thread prior to the edit was a mere reiteration of something that was rejected in an earlier CRT by the likes of @Mr. Bambu (Comment)
@Duedate8898 (Comment)
@ActuallySpaceMan42 (Comment)
This was accepted as possibly resistance to Fate Manipulation
Now let's address the other arguments.
The official translation does indeed state that fate and the plot are nothing more than a joke in front of him. This specific text was discussed in a Sweet Dao thread, and it was accepted and the translation was corrected.As far as I know you are correct about that but again Japanese is a language where the interpretation relies on the entire text as such nitpicking and isolating words and arguing isn't really the best.
Respect yourself; it would be better for you. You are saying I am a new member and don’t understand plot manipulation?? There are people outside this forum whose experience exceeds that of any member here in this community. It doesn’t matter when I joined; experience is not measured by membership duration.It's quite natural for a new member to not understand what fundamental aspects are, what they entail and what's necessary to argue for them so I won't blame you but I really hope you stop being ignorant of the standards, and actually read them for once and then formulate an argument. If you have trouble understanding just make a Q&A and ask it or dm a mod.
Firstly let's establish something
Plot Manipulation is not the same as Resistance to Plot ManipulationHowever there's a self evident correlation between both, in order to gain Resistance to Plot Manipulation one must demonstrate feats or at least have statements describing their inherent resistance to Plot Manipulation.
What the previous thread did wasn't merely removing the Resistance to Plot Manipulation but rather removing Plot as a fundamental metaphysical aspect from the verse.Like I said before ignorance isn't a bliss, I recommend reading the contents of a thread and not just the title.
Also I am not getting the whole “Umm actually I am arguing for Resistance and not Plot Manipulation” when the Resistance was the part that got nuked
TLDR; In order to get Resistance to Plot Manipulation Plot must be established as a fundamental metaphysical aspect.
You are essentially arguing that someone resists Info-2 or CM-1 when CM-1 or Info-2 doesn't even exist in the verse, like what ?
Hence this sarcastic comment;
We know the meaning of plot manipulation, so stop with these comments that are only meant to make us look ignorant and to present yourself as the only expert here.Somehow this has been the best argument and it doesn't even qualify for Plot Manipulation.
Let's start with defining what Plot Manipulation is because a lot of people don't understand it.
If the page failed to make it explicitly clear that Plot Manipulation is reserved for users that can manipulate Plot in a verse where Plot is a fundamental aspect that determines reality then I shall reiterate that again by directly quoting the Plot Manipulation Page itself.
So I fail to see how Yogiri being able to "kill” the Q&A section implies anything here aside from being a very explicit fourth wall break. I really hate beating up a dead horse but I have no choice before this spirals so let's actually address this feat shall we ?
The entire argument boils down to this:
The mysterious space has nothing to do with this topic, and I will open a separate thread about it someday.Now let's list some similar cases like this shall we ?
Believe me when I tell you that this is a miniscule amount of the total number of characters that have 4th wall awareness/Break and not Plot Manipulation despite having wayy better feats and now I would like to address something.
Characters often make such statements to prolong the gag but we both know that Yogiri can't meaningfully affect the Q&A section as a fictitious character. Often times many characters make such threatening statements and sometimes some even follow up but in no way are those anything beyond a fourth wall break.
Furthermore you yourself agreed that characters in the novel have feats resembling this nature which is tantamount to saying that this is nothing more than a mere gag.
Now let's put this to rest shall we ?
It's not a fallacy here, what you are describing is Whataboutism which isn't applicable here because no-one is answering anything rather people are comparing two similar cases with the similarity being relevant here and arguing via an example, if you think that's inherently fallacious you are more than welcome to debate me on that and we can let the staff decide.
I like how you speak with confidence as if you were an expert.I am sorry, what ? Do you genuinely believe that whenever a character breaks the 4th wall they enter our actual world ? In the Daily Life of the Immortal King Donghua, Wang king also went to a space outside his Donghua resembling our world as part of his story. Every fourth wall break is still inherently part of the narrative and the story that's why it's a gag.
Whew that's ⅔ of everything time to finish up with the actual argument.
I don’t know why I feel disgusted by your tone.Now these are some really compelling arguments from sukuna but they were already addressed by Dao in the previous thread which no-one bothered to read so let me paraphrase Dao once again (Poor guy leaves and everyone starts wanking)
Quite unfortunate that the page doesn't have the outdated label and that no-one bothered to nuke this but sure I can always nuke this later…
Let's have the staff judge this and obviously for any translation issues we can summon Raiki to help clarify.
Let's address this whilst we are at it shall we ?
This is proof that Dark’s claim is incorrect, as I already explained to you in this comment.This is further proof of Plot not existing as a fundamental aspect but I assume there's some TL issue so I suggest getting Raiki to TL it.
If you object to Yuichi Sakaki having plot manipulation again, you can open another thread to remove it. Otherwise, stop derailing the topic.Also I don't need to do that to argue against this CRT, what's written on the profiles isn't dogmatic or Axiomatic in any way shape or form, one can appeal to a profile yes and in order to change its contents I would need to make a CRT but I don't need to make one to nitpick every single flawed logic used in this CRT.
TLDR; Plot as a metaphysical aspect doesn't exist, the statement meant to give Yogiri his resistance as pointed out by Elizhaa is under contention, Neechan wa Chuunibyou profiles are outdated and the verse having plot is under contention in the first place. The Q&A is useless. That's all I will leave it up for staff to decide.also expect a surprise for making me waste nearly an hour of my precious time
Well imo Fate, Causality and Time are intrinsically connected. I am ignorant on the wiki standards but I can give my opinion and an explanation if that's what you wanted ?Since worldview holder is fate based and the power of fate manipulation can control causality, does that mean fate and causality are intertwined?
Umm you can essentially achieve the same affect ig but Plot Manipulation is more versatile and "potent" in a sense with lesser counters.I wonder if you can fate mani the fate of the plot one has
I really think he has fate manip, but iirc its already there on his profile lul.Well imo Fate, Causality and Time are intrinsically connected. I am ignorant on the wiki standards but I can give my opinion and an explanation if that's what you wanted ?
YepI really think he has fate manip, but iirc its already there on his profile lul.
I am seeing a lot of comments like this despite not using a single vulgar language whereas you have said stuff like thisTry to calm down and tone down your language a bit.
Yet you continue arguing something that isn't supported by the standards. I judge based on what I am seeing, I am not omniscient. Again argue why he meets the standards, I clearly quoted it and even explained it for you. I never attacked you or used your ignorance as a means to defame you but I genuinely recommend reading the standards.I’ve been discussing and understanding these things even 7 years ago, including classification systems and how they work.
By the way, shouldn’t Togiri have some form of fate manipulation rather than just fate resistance?Well imo Fate, Causality and Time are intrinsically connected. I am ignorant on the wiki standards but I can give my opinion and an explanation if that's what you wanted ?
Causality is just the relation between events where one event causes another
[Cause] ----> [Effect]
Time is what's enables an event (cause) to create an event(effect) to be more precise time is the dimension or along which events are ordered enabling us to distinguish between cause & effect.
These two are intrinsically connected now Fate is just destiny/future which basically entails manipulation of events at a future point (x) in time.
It's kinda like Yhwach who can manipulate causality because of Fate Manipulation.
Umm you can essentially achieve the same affect ig but Plot Manipulation is more versatile and "potent" in a sense with lesser counters.
I think it's like a passive Fate Manipulation Resistance (Heck I would argue for some sort of Immunity on a good day)By the way, shouldn’t Togiri have some form of fate manipulation rather than just fate resistance?