- 5,070
- 2,886
Not this again.No proof him existing without Rukh aka causality
Those who fall into depravity are no longer bound by the system of solomon's white rukh, rather they're under illah's black rukh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not this again.No proof him existing without Rukh aka causality
By destroying the world and attacking it and killing everyone in it.The angels or whatever they were ( them creepy ass Mf's) were returning the world to the rukh
yes still does not mean they exist outside causalityNot this again.
Those who fall into depravity are no longer bound by the system of solomon's white rukh, rather they're under illah's black rukh
How does having different rukh means they are operating on a different causality system?Existing outside causality is type 5. Operating on a different system is type 4. How does having Rukh prevents one from existing in a different system
bro thats NLF. Please... read what the statement really means.Not this again.
Those who fall into depravity are no longer bound by the system of solomon's white rukh, rather they're under illah's black rukh
We need staffDo we need staff to evaluate this? It isn't controversial, hell it's a downgrade.
Rukh itself isn't really faith or causality. It is just something that powerful enough to change itHow does having different rukh means they are operating on a different causality system?
You will need scan of rukh changing cause and effect, which there is none as far as I know.Rukh itself isn't really faith or causality. It is just something that powerful enough to change it
No, there is none as far as I am aware. The verse itself is not that deep.You will need scan of rukh changing cause and effect, which there is none as far as I know.
Also you will need scan that translate that translate saying having black rukh means you operate under a different cause and effect system.
And even if there was such scan which there isn't, there are so many anti-feats to it. Since black rukh can still affect white and vice-versa
Again I am saying this. Rukh isn't Faith. So a character having black or white Rukh has not to do with AC, also it seems you misinterpreted me when I said Rukh can change it. I was referring to the flow which life is born intoYou will need scan of rukh changing cause and effect, which there is none as far as I know.
Also you will need scan that translate that translate saying having black rukh means you operate under a different cause and effect system.
And even if there was such scan which there isn't, there are so many anti-feats to it. Since black rukh can still affect white and vice-versa
Lormac.... her point still stands, I never saw a scan where black Rukh operates on different causes and effects. In fact, there is 0 mention of the system either.Again I am saying this. Rukh isn't Faith. So a character having black or white Rukh has not to do with AC, also it seems you misinterpreted me when I said Rukh can change it. I was referring to the flow which life is born into
C'mon, we are saying the same thing. Having black Rukh doesn't mean you operate on a different system. What I am saying is that Rukh has nothing to do with Faith.Lormac.... her point still stands, I never saw a scan where black Rukh operates on different causes and effects. In fact, there is 0 mention of the system either.
Oh alright then. Rukh has something with fate as far as I am awareC'mon, we are saying the same thing. Having black Rukh doesn't mean you operate on a different system. What I am saying is that Rukh has nothing to do with Faith.
Solomon said it could change faith but that is also wrong considering events still went according to how illah planned it. Other than that, nothing elseOh alright then. Rukh has something with fate as far as I am aware
Does the flow of the world cover both faith and causality ?
I read all the scans you dropped. It explains “Rukh” and nature from “magi users”.Can someone please drop their thought on this
From what I see rukh isn't fate but what guides everyone towards the fate that has been set.Can someone please drop their thought on this
There is still a scan similar to the third scan,From what I see rukh isn't fate but what guides everyone towards the fate that has been set.
Could get causality if the 3rd scan was slightly more specific though. Doesn't help that there's no causality or time manipulation in the verse.
I got the scan from this thread,I read all the scans you dropped.
I got the scan from this thread,
There is still a scan similar to the third scan,
Yeah, this. Depending on how you look at it though, Fate might be>>causality in magiIt still does not qualify as one (if I am being so honest, somehow it could be interpreted as one, but the wiki is being strict about it)
The thing is causality is not even mentioned there but honestly, as you said, it seems Fate is higher than that.Yeah, this. Depending on how you look at it though, Fate might be>>causality in magi
Depends on how you look at it, the flow of the world contains multiple pathways, there is a pathway for physical laws, Karma etc.Yeah, this. Depending on how you look at it though, Fate might be>>causality in magi
Depends on how you look at it, the flow of the world contains multiple pathways, there is a pathway for physical laws, Karma etc.
According to David, there are countless pathways
Depends on how you look at it, the flow of the world contains multiple pathways, there is a pathway for physical laws, Karma etc.
According to David, there are countless pathways
This comment isn't mineI don't think this is enough to say, they are talking about cause and effect system
No it is not, it is a pretty popular saying that did not come from Magi but rather real life. That is the most basic definition of History that I was taught years ago in school, it has nothing to with cause and effect. But rather the present and the future depends on whether we learn from our history or not.This comment isn't mine
history define present, and then the future, meaning history is the cause and present is the effect, cause and effect, changing history meaning changing the cause, so causality
yeah, you can send messages to the walls of a few of themYa acc type should be removed, actually. I should get staff input on this
I do disagree with this, well it all still fall back how one defines history. History are events of the past. Take the history of our universe, the study of the history the universe wouldn't change the future, rather the event of the past forms the presentBut rather the present and the future depends on whether we learn from our history or not.
Yeah, I do agree with this. illah of control the pathway of history.And there is nothing like changing history not even in Magi,
CM was just bad.they lost CM type 1
Causality is never mentioned but always brought as an argument, like I read all threads about causality in Magi, and none of them mentioned it.So they're losing the Acausality the same way they lost CM type 1?
Why does magi usually end up only getting downgraded
Oh well, guess all profiles with Acausality type 4 should have it removed and changed to just resistance to fate manipulation
Doneyeah, you can send messages to the walls of a few of them