Above Baseline 2A Range

[Sniper670]

1. Is it above baseline range if a realm is stated to be "far beyond" a 2A structure? This 2A structure keeps expanding due to mwi but it can't reach this dimension.

2. The being who created the creator of the cosmology is larger than the 2A structure and encompasses everything (Large Size ) within himself, including the dimension far beyond the 2A structure. I know you'd need more than the range needed to destroy one 2A structure to kill him, but what is the vsbw baseline for "Far beyond". 2? 5? 10 times?

 

[Sniper670]

Bump

 

[jamie169]

What verse is this i think i also read something like this from Chinese novel

 

[Sniper670]

It's another series. I guess since it's similar, this question goes for both of them

 

[Sniper670]

Bump

 

[Sniper670]

Bump

 

[Sniper670]

Bump

 

[Sniper670]

Bump

 

[Reiner04]

Something that is bigger than 2a is low 1c

 

[Starfeldway]

Something that is bigger than 2a is low 1c

that's only if its quantitatively superior

 

[Reiner04]

that's only if its quantitatively superior

No

 

[Kirinator07]

No

Uh yea, it even states for Low 2-C and High 3-A.

 

[Reiner04]

Uh yea, it even states for Low 2-C and High 3-A.

Being bigger than 2A by default provides a structure qualitative superiority so point is quite mute.

 

[Kirinator07]

Being bigger than 2A by default provides a structure qualitative superiority so point is quite mute.

That's what he said.

 

[Reiner04]

that's only if its quantitatively superior

That's what he said.

"That's only when they have qualitative superiority", to the reply that "bigger than 2A is low 1C".

Seems like a reasoning that bigger than 2A doesn't equate to qualitative superiority at all. So my answer was no to that reasoning.

 

[Kirinator07]

"That's only when they have qualitative superiority", to the reply that "bigger than 2A is low 1C".

Seems like a reasoning that bigger than 2A doesn't equate to qualitative superiority at all. So my answer was no to that reasoning.

Still doesn't disprove that Low 1-C is quantitatively superior to 2-A.

 

[Reiner04]

Smh

 

[Vietthai96]

Tbh, beyond baseline 2-A range is a mistake, bruhhh, there is no such a thing as beyond baseline 2-A range

 

[Reiner04]

Anyway, I am in following the thread, given that it has been answered already.

 

[Sniper670]

Tbh, beyond baseline 2-A range is a mistake, bruhhh, there is no such a thing as beyond baseline 2-A range

I don't agree with you.

If a realm cannot be reached by characters who can easily cross a 2A cosmology, on account of "its too damn far", that's definitely above 2A range

 

[Vietthai96]

I don't agree with you.

If a realm cannot be reached by characters who can easily cross a 2A cosmology, on account of "its too damn far", that's definitely above 2A range

Hmm, well, that damn well extremely specific

 

[Fixxed]

Something that is bigger than 2a is low 1c

Not necessary, it must strictly/completely bigger than 2A. I mean the 2A structure must very very limited by that structure