• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

A question about the example used on the Higher-Dimensional Manipulation page

Status
Not open for further replies.
According to the discussions that I have had in private with DontTalk and Alakabamm, as far as I understand, it is still 0.
 
According to how DarkLK originally explained it to me as well.
 
Okay. I will ask DontTalk, Alakabamm, and DarkLK to take a look at this. If necessary, we will have to rewrite it.
 
We are working on solving the problem: https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/425763
 
yes $ 0 \cdot \infty $ is an indeterminate value for the real numbers, since since infinity isn't a real number.

what I mean by times in this context isn't the operation as defined on the real numbers, though. What that the meaning of X*Y in this context is would be more in the direction of "the size of the unification of X sets with size Y".

Technically a more difficult and mathematical explanation would be necessary for complete correctness, but for the casual reader saying it like this is easier to understand than a series of mathematical definitions and proofs, from which most readers wouldn't even understand the symbols.
 
The cardinality of the sets, you mean? And I think we should at least mention the more complex explanation, maybe put it beneath the simpler one
 
Read the pdf about hausdorff dimensions linked for more detailed explanations. (together with a more general script about measurement theory maybe)
 
And I don't mean the cardinality of the sets containing the points. When I say "the size of the unification of X sets with size Y" I mean the size as given by a Measure and X as in the amounts of sets with that size that are unified, or in other words as the cardinality of the set that contains the sets that are unified.

(Note: still simplified explanation)
 
i see

BTW, do you have a degree in any scientific fields? You seem to be highly knowledgeable.
 
Thank you to DontTalk for the help. So, should I close this thread?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top