- 2,047
- 778
I'll have to agree with Imade.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
5-A Kaguya (Naruto)
- Thread starter TheFinalOrder
- Start date
- Status
- 4,487
- 732
- Thread starter
- #83
Actually, that's not the description. It just says it's formed by the IT Chakra and holds within it the power to destroy the world. Doesn't talk about recreation or it's Jinton properties. Iirc. Neither does the TSB DB entry mention anything about the Jinton Properties.IMadeThisOn8-1-2017 said:
This is why I was saying what I was saying, but whatever. What's your opinion of the new proposal?
- 4,487
- 732
- Thread starter
- #84
IMade disagrees with the old proposal. Hasn't said anything about the new proposal. Thoughts on the new proposal?Rin The Dragon Empress said:
- 14,409
- 1,692
Rin The Dragon Empress said:
About what???
- 813
- 137
>People just insta agreeing without any reason
- 228
- 45
The wank with this one is stronk
@om
@om
- 228
- 45
I never said anything about a calc.
- 4,141
- 419
then which part was wank /false to u pls point me outGoddessOfWinterr- said:
not only that here we dont accept Kaguya as being able to destroy her dimensions either
this is true we dont accept here
5-A calc came from assuming that ETSB only destroying what inside the said dimensions(earth + moon)
as much i know space-time distraction was exclude from the calc or it cant be calc
- 4,487
- 732
- Thread starter
- #92
TheFinalOrder said:
- 4,487
- 732
- Thread starter
- #94
Can we please conclude this? Like seriously, the reason it keeps coming up is because it never gets freaking concluded.TheFinalOrder said:
Thoughts on the new proposal by staff?
- 4,487
- 732
- Thread starter
- #95
Bump
- 14,409
- 1,692
I agree with the new proposal
- 228
- 45
Oh I read that wrong, yea I'm good with that
- 4,487
- 732
- Thread starter
- #101
Bump
- 15,464
- 11,469
I guess the new proposal if ok. I personally would just say '''Higher'''. '''Far Higher''' to me at least would be jumping multiple tiers but it doesn't matter.
- 228
- 45
Yea far higher part was odd for me since that would imply beyond tier 5
- 14,409
- 1,692
M3X said:
We technically have to if we wanna be fair
- 4,487
- 732
- Thread starter
- #107
Well, the thing is, it's stated she gets an exponential increase. Unless we're gonna low ball her to Decimal exponents, which is extremely excessive, even "e┬╣" would amp her to 1000+ Zettatons.
- 15,464
- 11,469
I don't really like assuming anything in regards "exponential boosts" or "far stronger" because it's nothing concrete.TheFinalOrder said:
I could make Pariah Dark FTL by this logic but if others think it's okay I won't hold you guys up.
- 40,457
- 12,924
Still no. "Exponential increase" isn't going to have us use math there. Also that's not how e works.
- 14,947
- 1,823
I dont see how you can say no to far higher when it is literally mentioned by Zetsu that she is indeed far stronger.
- 228
- 45
Agree with cal
- 40,457
- 12,924
Of course she's far stronger. We ain't giving her 1000+ ZT for it.
- 228
- 45
^
- 15,464
- 11,469
You don't know what far stronger means though. Far Higher in my opinion should be reserved for those who could potentially break through multiple tiers.Rocker1189 said:
At least that's how I see it. Higher is fine in my opinion. Otherwise we got a lot of profiles that need updating.
- 228
- 45
Stuff like "far stronger" doesn't say enough
- 14,947
- 1,823
Oh I see, I thought that calculation was just to say that she would still be in the 5-B tier.The real cal howard said:
- 40,457
- 12,924
Also she isn't far stronger with the IT. The IT isn't a statistical boosting technique, nor does it have AP behind it. She's far stronger by absorbing chakra. The IT just sets her up for being able to absorb that chakra.
The better way of putting it is "Higher via absorbing chakra"
The better way of putting it is "Higher via absorbing chakra"
- 14,947
- 1,823
right, then higher is fine.
- 14,947
- 1,823
I mean the difference is literally null and void it i basically saying the same thing....The real cal howard said:
- Status
Similar threads
