- 16,960
- 4,860
- Thread starter
- #321
Not yet. We have more staff support and will wait, but the earlier issues were addressed and taken care of.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
2-A Pokemon Upgrade Revival: The Time Has Come
- Thread starter ProfessorKukui4Life
- Start date
- Status
- 16,960
- 4,860
- Thread starter
- #322
Jokes aside, do you btw agree with the upgrade Lord T?Serperior is the best mon
- 1,626
- 148
How many more agreements are needed
- 15,447
- 15,853
Oh yeah, I do.
- 16,960
- 4,860
- Thread starter
- #326
Gimme a sec.
- 16,960
- 4,860
- Thread starter
- #327
Agreeing:
34 Non-staff: (Lord Tracer, MikeBro, JooCipher, InfiniteDay, Rikimarox2, Adam_Warlock69, Pink999999, Ottavio, Oleggator, Zencha9, GohanBlanko, The_Axiom_of_Virgo, Starsprite53, GlaceonGamez471, Asriel77, Lord_JJJ, Greenshifter, Greatlskander, Shmooply, ShadowWarrior, Planck69, Psychomaster35, Crimson_Shadow101, StrymULTRA, ShadowGamerOmega, Bobsican, Half_Shiny, TheQuirkyBoy, Rikimarox2, PlozAlcachaz, Sadistic_Sleuth, theultimate5105, deonment, Hasty12345)
4 Staff (DarkDragonmedus, KieranH10, ShadowBokunohero, Saman) Potentially 5 if Eficiente compromising to likely/possibly means he agrees
In total: 38 in favor, possibly 39.
As for the disagree side, im unsure if they count or not since pretty much all of the stuff they brought as counters were either already addressed in my evidence blog, or got addressed here in this thread and debunked.
But should they count, Somebody and Iamanimous are the only ones that gave actual disagreements here.
Last edited:
- 16,960
- 4,860
- Thread starter
- #329
Fair. I listed them just incase.
- 15,273
- 7,006
I'll make a blog with everything accepted later to support the new ratings today.
- 16,960
- 4,860
- Thread starter
- #331
Why would we need to make a whole new blog?
We can just edit the one I made to specify what's accepted for the new ratings.
- 15,273
- 7,006
The yours is a sandbox not an actual blog tho
- 4,942
- 1,317
2-B, likely/possibly 2-A
- 16,960
- 4,860
- Thread starter
- #335
I don't think it really matters seeing as sandboxes are basically the same thing and if needed I can just copy and paste it into a blog.
The sandbox has all of the stuff usable for 2-A, so the stuff out of them that gets accepted for 2-A could always just be cited in a different section to specify what was accepted.
- 16,960
- 4,860
- Thread starter
- #336
- 15,273
- 7,006
Ye, I just meant that, resize that Palkia pic to an acceptable size and you should be good to go.
- 920
- 257
- 16,960
- 4,860
- Thread starter
- #339
oh my bad, missed you
- 15,273
- 7,006
- 6,605
- 4,155
When it's just one statement, taking it as "the multiverse just expand" is just safer
Especially when the statement isn't a flat out "infinite universes".
Which is why I can at best agree with possibly/likely. Would prefer a possibly tho.
- 16,960
- 4,860
- Thread starter
- #344
^This.
Being bigger than Baseline 2-A sized Multiverses (For size, not AP value) is a thing.
- 15,273
- 7,006
I can see your logic tho
Well, "possibly 2-A" is going to be generally accepted, and I don't mind such.
In short, what was accepted is:
- The physical universe/the whole of universes being "possibly" infinite, but would still get "possibly 2-A" because of the usage of MWI
- Pokémon reality made of 39.53 millions of multiverses in its entirely, each one made of "countless, possibly infinite universes"
- 2-Bs being upgraded to "2-B, possibly 2-A"
- 2-B levels being upgraded
- 4-Bs being upgraded to "4-B, possibly High 3-A" due of Necrozma absorbing light from an universe possibly infinite in size (tho that would prolly require a discussion, but that shouldn't have problems as basically Necrozma's feat relies on the universe's size)
Last edited:
- 15,273
- 7,006
Fine I guess, this is just about tier 2s
- 167,855
- 76,474
Okay. It seems like this has probably been accepted then. My apologies SomebodyData.
- 3,566
- 879
Good so I guess the changes can finally be applied
- 15,273
- 7,006
At this point, I'd like to get these profiles unlocked.
However, before applying the changes, I'd wait Kukui to see if he'll convert his sandbox to a blog modified to fit what's accepted or if I should do so.
- 4,187
- 1,484
I agree with 2-B, likely/possibly 2-A
- 5,231
- 2,631
I see your point but what about time than? It is infinite but it doesn't "expand" like space, and yet dialga and plalkia are considered equals in pretty much everyway.
- 15,273
- 7,006
- 16,960
- 4,860
- Thread starter
- #356
I will do so.
Gilad_Hyperstar
He/Him- 11,411
- 4,333
The evidence showed here definitely sounds like 2-A. I agree to this too
- 16,960
- 4,860
- Thread starter
- #360
Okay I am finished now Ant.
- Status
Similar threads
