- 111
- 17
Well, I am not the thread creator so I can't actually edit it. But with the evidence provided do u agree to the thread?That is contributable, you should add it in the OP.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, I am not the thread creator so I can't actually edit it. But with the evidence provided do u agree to the thread?That is contributable, you should add it in the OP.
I'll add it nowThat is contributable, you should add it in the OP.
How can we even prove it to be a physical energy, when the first thing is does is erase anything that is physical and turn them to nothingness, while also it's place of origin lacks any physicality. It doesn't make sense to me, to be honest. And pardon me, as this is the first time I'm introduced to something like this while talking about voids.As I said, energy is fundamentally a physical property. So therefore, one should show it as a kind of metaphysical aspect rather than a physical energy. Physical energy also has creation/destruction like the way our universe is created. So in general, these things do not make much sense.
The void starts outside of the universe (low 2-C), so characters who are immune to it's existence erasure can just exit their universe and enter it, it doesn't really seem like a problem, as the void get 1-A rating because of it's non dimensionality and it's overall size (much vaster than physical reality).What I want to mention is that for them to move or rather advance from Non 1-A into 1-A, they will need intervention from proper 1-A beings. If they enter on their own, this will downgrade it to Non 1-A.
Erase matter doesn't mean is not a kind of physics. There are many things we can explain under sight of physical phenomena. So, my opinion doesn't change.How can we even prove it to be a physical energy, when the first thing is does is erase anything that is physical and turn them to nothingness, while also it's place of origin lacks any physicality. It doesn't make sense to me, to be honest. And pardon me, as this is the first time I'm introduced to something like this while talking about voids.
The problem here is they can enter 1-A without any 1-A help, your explain doesn't make sense. A 1-A is non-composite. This mean is cannot reach, cannot get or innacessible form any non 1-A.The void starts outside of the universe (low 2-C), so characters who are immune to it's existence erasure can just exit their universe and enter it, it doesn't really seem like a problem, as the void get 1-A rating because of it's non dimensionality and it's overall size (much vaster than physical reality).
It doesn't say that a non 1-A character can't enter a void of nothingness. Literally the void of nothingness starts outside reality, that is why this criteria isn't usually applied to void of nothingness on this wiki. It is not a conceptual domain that is transcendent and inaccessible from reality, it is a void of nothingness. And this doesn't exclude the void of nothingness from 1-A. So it doesn't really matter cuz this is an illogical argument. The stuff that u say have never been used to exclude a void of nothingness from 1-A rating.The problem here is they can enter 1-A without any 1-A help, your explain doesn't make sense. A 1-A is non-composite. This mean is cannot reach, cannot get or innacessible form any non 1-A.
It doesn't say that a non 1-A character can't enter a void of nothingness. Literally the void of nothingness starts outside reality, that is why this criteria isn't usually applied to void of nothingness on this wiki. It is not a conceptual domain that is transcendent and inaccessible from reality, it is a void of nothingness. And this doesn't exclude the void of nothingness from 1-A. So it doesn't really matter cuz this is an illogical argument. The stuff that u say have never been used to exclude a void of nothingness from 1-A rating.
A tier Low 1-A can still be achieved by quantitive superiority. A 1-A can only be achieved by qualitive superiority. The composition (nothingness) surpasses the very composition of lower reality. No matter how many realities u stack u ain't getting the same composition as the void and this supperority of the void over the lower reality is also due to its non existent nature.So answer me, what do you think is the difference between tier 1-A and 11-C up to Low 1-A?
??????The argument of non 1-A beings not being able to enter 1-A doesn't apply to containers ofc. As they are containers, they contain reality so just existing ur reality would put u in them while they still can be of a superior nature. But ofc the void also erases anyone who doesn't enter without special things like void tech for example.
A non 1-A being need to be empowered by a 1-A to reach 1-A. Where are you base on to say that??????However, there are ways to bypass this barrier. For example, a non-1-A can be empowered by a higher entity into being able to influence things on a qualitatively superior level. This can happen either by a straightforward power boost, or by means of some innate metaphysical potential rooted in something from a higher reality (This can include both characters who are converted into natives of higher planes and characters who are physically lower-dimensional but have 1-A statistics). In neither case is the capability to reach into the higher level something emergent from the structure of the lower level, and therefore they are acceptable ways to get around the above hurdles.
He got the argument from me, xD, so let me clarify it for you, since its prolly his choice of wording that you're having a hard time understanding.@Astral_Trinity439 can you explain to him? He got big misunderstood here.
Indeed, but that's only if the Non 1-A being is becoming 1-A via a gain in power. This is because you can't, as you know, add quantitative power[non 1-A power] on top of itself to achieve 1-A.A non 1-A being need to be empowered by a 1-A to reach 1-A. Where are you base on to say that??????
You can just snip my message, cuz sometimes @ mentions don't ping me[idk if its just me or if its a problem with everyone].@Astral_Trinity439 I'm not really care this verse. I'm done with this crt because I say everything I need to say. Besides, I just say something about like 1-A and Non 1-A feats.
AlrYou can just snip my message, cuz sometimes @ mentions don't ping me[idk if its just me or if its a problem with everyone].
In any case, sure. Though, the explanation I gave has some general examples as well.
Actually how it is stated in the BDE page is that if a void of nothingness is much vaster than normal reality and the common imagery is a universe a small object in a vast backdrop then they should qualify for 1-ABeing the nothingness which made everything isn't really a qualification for 1-A, otherwise every Void would just be an automatic jump.
The thing is that you can't be nothingness and contain the entire reality, be vast compared to it and not be 1-A, something that is a void lacks all type of time, space, physicality and dimensionality. There are a few ways this can go, 1 is that they are nothingness but they are much smaller than the physical reality, in this case they are 0 dimensional beings. 2 is that they are aspatial and atemporal but they are still comparable with things that have dimensionality, in this case they get BDE Type 1. 3 is that they are nothingness and they are much vaster than physical reality such that there very composition surpasses that of the physical reality. In this case the voids get BDE Ttpe 2 and are 1-A.A simple example being voids of nothingness that lack space, time and physicality entirely, but are nonetheless "vaster" than physical reality in some way, with common imagery being the universe as a small object encompassed in such a backdrop.
However, if they are applied to realms that can be inferred to surpass the very composition of the lower reality (e.g. Realms that are, themselves, non-composite, such as conceptual domains, or often, voids of nothingness), then 1-A is the most appropriate rating for them.
It is true that some voids that are staed to be nothingness don't get 1-A but that is not because their nothingness don't qualify for 1-A its cuz they got anti-statements that disqualify them from 1-A. For example: Garganta is also called nothingness, but garganta also has statements that say that it has time. Such statements disqualify it from 1-A as it is not true nothingness and rather just an empty higher dimensional space/bulk space. The void has no such anti-statements though so that shouldn't be a problem.otherwise every Void would just be an automatic jump.
and the "larger" is the deciding factor here, because as her the BDE page, you cannot have a void that's "larger"/"superior"/"Vaster" then Space-time yet also of the same reality level; i.e., it has to be 1-A.I don't see the Void here as qualitatively superior to the Multiverse, just larger and where it comes from.
I double checked my my thoughts with Ultima and he has confirmed to me that the idea of a Void being larger than a Multiverse or Space-time isn't automatic grounds for 1-A, my Bathtub Void idea reminds sound.and the "larger" is the deciding factor here, because as her the BDE page, you cannot have a void that's "larger"/"superior"/"Vaster" then Space-time yet also of the same reality level; i.e., it has to be 1-A.
Could you link where you confirmed it? [Just want to clear up my own thoughts]I double checked my my thoughts with Ultima and he has confirmed to me that the idea of a Void being larger than a Multiverse or Space-time isn't automatic grounds for 1-A, my Bathtub Void idea reminds sound.
Hmm, the BDE2 page says it is, tho, if that was the case then that line should be removed.This idea that they have to be was a misconception from Agnaa apparently and isn't something that is a part of the system.
I'm friends with Ultima on discord, so it was in our private chat.Could you link where you confirmed it? [Just want to clear up my own thoughts]
This would be more so something you'd have to take up with them, since the system is still rather new and settling.Hmm, the BDE2 page says it is, tho, if that was the case then that line should be removed.
Also another thing I would like to add is that the void is incomprehensible/unimaginable for everyone.I'm friends with Ultima on discord, so it was in our private chat.
This would be more so something you'd have to take up with them, since the system is still rather new and settling.
Like I say, my conclusion is based what I see in the OP, I'm happy to be shown more to change my mind.Also another thing I would like to add is that the void is incomprehensible/unimaginable for everyone.
It is actually in the Op, we updated it.Like I say, my conclusion is based what I see in the OP, I'm happy to be shown more to change my mind.
What do u exactly disagree with?so many things I've seen before ahh... Disagree FRA
Oh, the Developer comment? From what I saw it says its "unimaginable".It is actually in the Op, we updated it.
1-AWhat do u exactly disagree with?
Then again, this wouldn't be the first time they describe something found in the story via social media articles. For example around 85% of the lore we know about he Eternals comes from their teasers from back in 2016 posted on the devs' main social media platform, VK, released a couple of days before they opened the beta-testing server for Underworld Raids. There are about five entries that talk about their origins. And this is lore that is not exactly brought up in-game, but neither does it contradict anything we see of them in the game.Oh, the Developer comment? From what I saw it says its "unimaginable".
I would like to see some sources from the game first. The developer post (or news post, I can't tell which) is nice for backing up anything said in the game, but I don't really find it stands on its own merits, since it seems promotional/sensational and naturally comes from an extra-literary source.
Bruh like what do u disagree with here that u think makes this not get 1-A?
In the official English version of that article, it says incomprehensible. Either way, Incomprehensible or unimaginable, they both sort of imply the same thing, that the nature of the void is impossible to understand or grasp for anyone that is of the physical reality (almost whole verse basically).Oh, the Developer comment? From what I saw it says its "unimaginable".
I do find that particularly worrisome, since there's less intention for words said from extra-literary sources to reflect on the work itself.For example around 85% of the lore we know about he Eternals comes from their teasers from back in 2016 posted on the devs' main social media platform, VK, released a couple of days before they opened the beta-testing server for Underworld Raids.
Here's the English version of it.Oh, the Developer comment? From what I saw it says its "unimaginable".
The thread has been updated with more info, please do check it out.i feel like this is way too vague for a 1-A rating
We're talking about Ultima here, the one who made that very page and every line in it; Why would Ultima say "that thing is not enough for BDE2" when the lines they wrote on the page say otherwise?This would be more so something you'd have to take up with them, since the system is still rather new and settling.
Why would he say that...?We're talking about Ultima here, the one who made that very page and every line in it; Why would Ultima say "that thing is not enough for BDE2" when the lines they wrote on the page say otherwise?
His own msgs on the site contradicts what u said, this corresponds with the BDE page and it also corresponds with our threadWhy would he say that...?
Because I asked him...?
But this should correspond with BDE 2 pageDisagree FRA.
I don't how this doesn't qualify.A simple example being voids of nothingness that lack space, time and physicality entirely, but are nonetheless "vaster" than physical reality in some way, with common imagery being the universe as a small object encompassed in such a backdrop.
Feel free to ask him on here yourself. I asked him on Discord.His own msgs on the site contradicts what u said, this corresponds with the BDE page and it also corresponds with our thread