This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I think the key word there is usually- particularly only in verses which heavily relate time and space to the real science of spacetime.
There are plenty of verses where they aren't directly linked like that.
If someone can sense every atom in the universe, I don't think it's fair to completely...
The canon page currently separates canon into categories already:
Primary: The primary canon is the source material first released
Secondary: ...with the other author works being secondary canon
Tertiary: The tertiary canon consists of official adaptations not overseen by the author, which do...
What my assumption was, and what feels implied by the terminology is this:
Supporter: "I'm familiar with, love, and want to participate in this verse. Please contact me if there's a discussion about it."
Neutral: "I'm familiar with this verse, without strong opinions, and am willing to...
In short: no.
Per the page:
Creating and/or manipulating even very specific laws would still fall under law manipulation.
To manipulate the fundamental laws of the entire world would just be a very powerful high-end example of the power, not the minimum qualification.
If it is limited by...
Thank you for adding some scans, I will evaluate what I can now.
No, but it does say possibly. I have no problem with listing that on his profile from the interview. Though typically you would include the lower end as well, such as some justification for 10-B.
Preferably, you would get calcs...
You'll need to provide a lot more specific proof.
For example, links to these twitter posts and interviews.
Otherwise, I'm not really in any position to take your word for it, and these sources are otherwise very unorthodox.
I will say:
If it's something they do mid-combat, then I could see an even more general ability like "crafting" possible.
That stipulation would also address my concern of everyone being able to do it.
Perhaps then, since people seem to insist on option 2, you should write up some potential guidelines which you would be happy with.
Though, to be honest, I personally struggle to think of one which would neatly encompass all the potential examples we might want to make an exception. From a...
I have recorded people's opinions so far below.
I excluded option 3, since nobody thinks it's a good idea.
In summary:
A vast majority of people, including six administrators, are voting for option 2, which is to list a root power and any resulting powers which have actually been showcased.
A...
I agree with DontTalkDT.
To concoct something is simply to mix ingredients together.
In a world where these ingredients exist, literally anybody can do this.
To do it right is just a difference of knowledge, which would go under intelligence.
Even if someone had no knowledge, they could just...
Below is everything I have a potential problem with. If something isn't mentioned, then assume I am fine with it. In addition, I'm assuming things which are crossed off are things you are no longer proposing, and therefore give no opinion on.
Avatar creation require that the avatar be different...
I hear you, and you do have a point, even if it doesn't technically directly disprove it.
Given that it's vague, and only from the statement of someone who thinks highly of themselves, why not list it as a possibly?
The Cheeseburger was invented in 1924, and were a phenomena that did not exist in the beginning, but I do not think putting the recipe together qualifies anyone for conceptual manipulation.
Color is simply how our brains interpret different wavelengths of light. The only (direct) concepts part...
To have cosmic awareness, it needn't be perfect. Just as you can have eyes and still miss things.
Even if he missed certain events, it's still possible, and implied by himself, that he has the ability to feel certain things on a cosmic scale.
Anything I don't mention, assume I'm fine with.
Conceptual Manipulation:
I can't get behind it.
Creating "colors" could be as simple as designing the part of our brain that interprets different wavelengths, or just naming them as the quote more directly references.
Creating "hugs" could be as...
TL;DR:
This is a good thing, but needs to define malicious/clueless.
Summary of my positive thoughts:
Having standards for punishment don't just make the system more fair, they also make it easier to use and understand.
It gives a reference to both staff and regular users how a typical offense...
Thank you, that clears it up.
It does seem like Resistance to Soul Manipulation.
Though it does seem like "forcibly remove" is a more accurate term than "destroy," that does not change anything in this case.
I simply feel like I'm missing a lot of context as to how this battle went, how souls work in general, and how their attacks work in relation to that.
Scans would help.
I agree with everything except 7, on which you can consider me neutral, just due to lack of knowledge.
Also, the power would be "Invulnerability", not "Invincibility".
It seems that by the site's definition it is, my apologies.
I was using the more traditional definition of seeing the future.
Though it seems like the site has clairvoyance fundamentally linked with extrasensory perception.
Alright. I can accept that then. I just wanted to make sure.
You mean...
I suppose I'll clarify that even though I oppose the ban on principle for my previously stated reasons, I am also not strongly opposed to it practically since a few days is incredibly short.
Thank you.
After reviewing your posts, I agree that a ban is simply not warranted.
Your intentions seem purely comedic rather than malicious, and while I'd suggest that you be a bit more careful since it's easy to misinterpret that sort of comedy as rude over a public text-based medium, I...
Semantically, "Superhuman Precision" is simply far superior as a general term for accuracy than "Marksmanship," which contains a very strong connotation with firearms/archery. Marksmanship sounds like a far better fit as a subset of Weapon Mastery.
Sure.
This is extrasensory perception, not clairvoyance.
Scan? I don't remember this part.
Sure.
Scan? I remember them existing at the beginning of time, but not before it, and disrespecting him since the beginning of time only inherently implies the former, not the latter.
Sure, when...
Topaz is being a bit sassy, but I don't see anything which constitutes a genuine rule violation.
If you feel that there is personal resentment between you two, then perhaps it is best to simply stop engaging with each other.
If you express that wish to Topaz, and they continue replying to all...
I have no interest in this verse, and this is no longer a staff discussion thread.
Therefore, I will be unfollowing, my apologies.
Feel free to message me on my wall if my input is absolutely needed, though.
I understand that, but the x is not necessarily implied, and the response question even points that out. Some possibilities include:
42x stronger
42% stronger
42 megajoules stronger
42 leagues stronger
And since responding with just "42" is a common internet meme, it makes me think that is all...
Well, was there ever a follow-up to this?
42 with no context could mean a lot of things, and is also a very common internet joke, which makes me believe that is this case here.
First, let me say that this thread is very well researched and contains plenty of evidence and effort, which I think is an underrated quality in many content revision threads, Despite having no familiarity with Ninjago, it does a great job of laying the framework for the proposal, so great job...
My sentiments mirror Qawsedf234, and in part mirror my sentiments in the Supergenius thread.
I don't think knowledge of alterations in time should be inherently part of cosmic awareness.
Space and time are very distinct things, with time being qualitatively superior on a dimensional basis...