This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
It is. That thing only covers like 4 books... Out of 40+ years game history.
Truenames are the most fundamental thing in D&D. Souls already are abstract type 1, as each soul is conceptual in nature. These souls by themselves possess truenames, which are the building blocks of all of reality/the...
To be noted, Wanda herself has deconstruction with her magic blasts. So it's a matter on who can one shot the other first. And Wanda's stuff from what I remember do usually take at least a gesture to conjure (besides the reality warp on Blackbolt, but that isn't in character for her to start...
No, Jean would win lol
Jean > Apocalypse/Wanda > Professor X, essentially
She has the better feat, and that showing is at a weaker key than she's fighting here. Jean definitely takes the mind battle
The fact she doesn't start with either of those options
However, what's more interesting is what would happen in a mind battle, since Jean can beat Apocalypse who > Professor X (same as Wanda)
According to the profile, he does this by fixing someones causality. But that's not how D's NEP works with. His "soul" (this is not the correct term, it's more abstract than even concepts because VHD shenanigans) just resides in an abstract realm completely non existant. Is not that he would...
I can confirm. Others are also kinda just... Wrong lol vector manipulation is bs
Also, my mistake. This isn't one of the 5-D ones, but he does resist transmutation.
D's... Essence? Doesn't exist in the timeline. It's part of an abstract dream-non existent realm or some shit (VHD is weird with these things). So he could unironically just survive that or use his left arm and absorb/negate what Rick uses.
D resists at 5-D
That sounds like resurrection with extra types ngl.
Even so: D realizes he can't kill Rick, then just stands there with his aura active while any potential tech or machine get negated by the pendant if not directly affected by the aura. Now what?
Bruh. First novel alone has nuclear reactors, weather manipulation machines across continental scale, forcefield, laser weapons, quantum computers and bs. D's pendant negates it.
D's pendant can even negate Nobles tech that create pocket dimensions, forcefields with the power of the galaxies'...
Agreed.
@TheFallenProfit
Your question has been answered. I understand it's not to your satisfaction, but regardless, that's how things stand at the moment. If you wish to challenge it, I invite you to make a proper downgrade thread. I will be closing this now.
That sounds like we might have to downgrade stanford instead
Jest jest. I honestly do support the upgrade. While I understand where Ant is coming from (which people, what he is saying is that Tony is good in one specific area, while people like Doom and Reed can rival his expertise (if not...
Taking a closer look: These scans don't seem to be made in response to the thread at all. They were made several months ago. (1 of them close to a year ago)
So this part of Bambu's evaluation seems incorrect:
Edit: Whether that changes the verdict I leave up to you, but got mentioned to me...
If they tried using that to harass someone on site, then we would take it more seriously. But as is, it's just salty comments from someone that disagree with how we handle things. It's completely irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.
If he had otherwise said that on site, that's a different...
A 1 week ban doesn't achieve this? When we have given warning for comparatively worse behavior than name calling.
The second part is why I advocated for a ban at all. And it's also not entirely true, he did accept the ban.
Like, 1 month ban for petty insults? Doesn't sit well with me when we...