• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Qawsedf234
Reaction score
17,626

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Hello, apologies for what I'm about to ask but it is a high priority for the verse I've been revising. I have a CRT that needs a staff's approval, problem is that me and another user have been going back and forth on it causing it to be very bloated in the comments for it which means staff are far less likely to actually do anything with it.

    A staff member has already and approved it, with me and all of the active knowledgeable members agreeing with the composite (with it also practically being the current versions of the profiles anyway). Other revisions are effectively locked up until this is resolved, hence why I am asking for assistance as there is half a century worth of content needed to be gone over and a delay like this isn't helping.
    Could you evaluate this CRT when you get the chance please and thank you.
    Could you please comment on this thread?
    Heyy Qawsed, good day, please can you take a look at your convenience. Thank you ❤️
    Curious you mentioned 5-D gravity theory in the DBZ thread. So I'm wondering what tier would said universe in fiction get if it was destroyed completely? 5-D Axis of Gravity and 4-D Time Axis

    "If you mean historically, back in the early 1900s gravity was considered as a fifth dimensional axis to time's fourth dimension"
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    Curious you mentioned 5-D gravity theory in the DBZ thread. So I'm wondering what tier would said universe in fiction get if it was destroyed completely? 5-D Axis of Gravity and 4-D Time Axis
    For that particular theory Low 2-C, since while gravity was a fifth dimensional axis, they concluded that it was a compacted dimension:
    Though we now know that their approaches were inaccurate, each proposed to unify electromagnetism and gravity by extending general relativity by an extra dimension. Klein’s contribution best addressed the question of why such a fifth dimension would not be observable—consistent with Ehrenfest’s conclusion that space appears three-dimensional. In an idea known as compactification, Klein envisioned that the higher dimension would be rolled up into a tiny, compact loop on the order of 10^-33 centimeters. Thus, while it would supply (in theory, if not in practice) a means of unification, it would be undetectable—like a curled up pill bug camouflaged as a dot on a leaf.

    Source
    Huesito88
    Huesito88
    Ahh I see like the string theory, compacted.
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    Yeah it what lead into that theory later on in the 20th century.
    Please evaluate this. Thank you.
    Mind giving your input here ?
    Is this an uncountably infinite number?

    everything in the universe is existing at/on some coordinate in space and time (infinite coordinates per thing/object [most particularly stars, and Atoms]) the infinitely many existing things individually (by themselves [for example an individual atom]) are creating infinite branches in time per coordinate in 3D space and infinitely more branches per coordinate in/on the temporal axis these individually infinitely existing things exist on
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    I mean, sure? But its a standard Low 2-C statement.
    TheUnshakableOne
    TheUnshakableOne
    That's fine and okay. I'm just looking to see if it equates to an uncountable infinity the tier isn't really what I'm looking for with it tbh just if it was an example of uncountably infinite
    Heyy Qawsef, this thread has been on for a while with not much moderator attention, please can you take a look at your convenience. Thank you ❤️

    Can I get your input and vote on this thread?
    Can you please help us, only one staff vote is missing 🙏.
    I kindly ask you to come to CRT for the final decision.
    You had previously approved Sonic's 1-A upgrade regarding Deadline. Could you please review this?

    Hey, Qawsed, at your convenience, can you check/ evaluate the below 🙏,? It has been up for over 9 months now. Thanks!!

    Hi, I would like you to check it out.

    Hi, could you check this please?

    Cam you comment on if this qualitys as R>F?
    Hello sorry to disturb you but I have to ask you something

    In a previous thread it was accepted that neutral zone a construct that holds all the macrocosms of dragon ball follows parallelism and qualified for extra spatial axis but it was considered insignificant 5d now the question is

    Would neutral zone being infinite or stated to be infinite make it significant 5d/low 1c?
    Killerdrone123
    Killerdrone123
    The thing is in this thread it was accepted that neutral zone had an extra insignificant 4th spatial axis since it follows parallelism now my main question was if neutral zone was stated to be infinite would this make the insignificant 4th spatial axis, significant to be tiered since we have found some new info on it
    Qawsedf234
    Qawsedf234
    It being infinite spatially doesn't mean it's 5D. It just means that it has infinite volume in the standard X,Y,Z spaces with an unknown N+1 axis size.
    Killerdrone123
    Killerdrone123
    I see thanks
    Hello, could you evaluate this crt
    Can you comment on this thread? The OP cannot properly contend against my arguments.
    Hi. Can you check this thread pls
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top