- 14,997
- 10,332
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If I'm incorrect Show proof then, I've been asking for forever and no one has shown a bit of proofDid you not see the example that was set for the other person who tried this?
Edit: also this is your first message? Really? You choose to derail the thread with something already addressed after 2 months of being in the forum. Can you atleast try bring counter arguments.
okay guys thats enoughHonestly arguing with an illiterate is not worth it
I don't need to respect people who put together such a poorly articulated thread and pass it off as an argument, it's practically all completely nonsense and wank, and the parts that aren't nonsense is iffy at bestAlso I suggest being more respectful otherwise you might get reported in RvR.
Also I suggest being more respectful otherwise you might get reported in RvR.
Okay guys, no more replies. This is only making the thread unnecessarily long.Yeah
Mate, you don’t need to respect anyone, but at least try not to be a jerk. Anyway, before anything else, read these first because right now, you’re coming across as ignorant. If you disagree, you can make a thread debunking them, and we can argue about it properly there.I don't need to respect people who put together such a poorly articulated thread and pass it off as an argument, it's practically all completely nonsense and wank, and the parts that aren't nonsense is iffy at best
How hypocritical, you haven't even made a single counter argument and instead tried to be the morality police, I can't make this shit upYou have to respect people regardless of what they do/did. It doesn’t matter if the argument is bad or good in your eyes. You’re setting off a bad example as a member of this community, especially considering these are your first few messages in the 2 months you’ve been here.
Anyways this is my last reply towards you and I hope you respect others and also form actual counterarguments instead of spouting what you believe against something that’s already accepted and bring meaningful arguments to not only this thread but others.
I ain't reading all that, besides all it is is a bunch of people fellating the OP, it's not worth itOkay guys, no more replies. This is only making the thread unnecessarily long.
Mate, you don’t need to respect anyone, but at least try not to be a jerk. Anyway, before anything else, read these first because right now, you’re coming across as ignorant. If you disagree, you can make a thread debunking them, and we can argue about it properly there.
![]()
A Revision about a World of Slimes - Back to Tier 2 (Cosmology)
Introduction Good morning/evening everyone, hope ya'll are doing fine. Considering Volume 22 has added some more context to what we thought before, I decided to try a revision to get the verse back to Tier 2 in general. As always, avoid any toxic behavior or derailing! Also, don't start...vsbattles.com
![]()
A Revision about a World of Slimes: Part 2 — Introduction to Otherworld
Introduction Hello everyone, hope ya'll are having a good day. So last time in the tier 2 thread, while tier 2 was accepted for Worlds/Space-Times, we didn't get much progress on Worlds and Dimensions being the same or different other than the initial arguments, and due to the lack of...vsbattles.com
![]()
A Revision About A World of Slimes — Conclusions (Final Part)
Introduction Hello everyone, hope everything's going fine. This CRT is to make the conclusions of the previously concluded two staff CRTs. This CRT is for assigning tiers to each character. Permission to post was granted by our favorite mod @FinePoint on discord! Important Notes Before...vsbattles.com
Counter-arguing things that have already been settled doesn't count. You'd better read the threads where that's being discussed instead of leaving comments like thisWorld's are planets until you show me scans that say otherwise, downgrade the verse to planet level instead worlds being the size of planets makes your entire argument invalid by itself and your entire post is just explaining how dimensions work, you have to prove that its 5D with feats and statements backing it up
Anyway this is a warning, be respectful and civil to everyone here, i get that you disagree with the thread, it is fine, your opinion, but be nice, stop being a jerk to others just because you think something is wankI ain't reading all that, besides all it is is a bunch of people fellating the OP, it's not worth it
I mean, you said the worlds are just planets, that's a positive claim you made and therefore you must prove it yourself. Other supporters have try hard to prove these so-called ‘worlds’ are actually universes. After much effort and debate, their arguments were finally accepted by the staffs.I ain't reading all that, besides all it is is a bunch of people fellating the OP, it's not worth it
If world in context is me, then sureI swear the world don't want me to rest
This isn't a place for children, move along, this topic has already been extensively discussed several times, in detailWorld's are planets until you show me scans that say otherwise,
I'd like to see you trydowngrade the verse to planet level instead worlds being the size of planets
What a strange form of humormakes your entire argument invalid by itself
They don't listen to you, assert your dominance by deleting their postsDude, i just literally said in RVR that you guys should stop engaging with him, and you told him he is a children
![]()
World is very vague, so you have to prove and clarify what it actually means otherwise I'll just assume it means planet, after 1000 threads begging for an upgrade I have yet to see a real definition or clarificationI mean, you said the worlds are just planets, that's a positive claim you made and therefore you must prove it yourself. Other supporters have try hard to prove these so-called ‘worlds’ are actually universes. After much effort and debate, their arguments were finally accepted by the staffs.
You asked these people to prove themselves, then they gave you the previous threads that explains and answers everything you want. And then you still say they haven't proven anything.
This is your problem, not theirs, because they've already proven everything. If you don't believe it, it won't matter anyway, unless you create a CRT to refute everything (That's if you can anyway. So good luck with that)
Edit: sorry for responding to him, feel like I have to say something.
Me thinks your projecting and very mad that I'm not blindly agreeing with youThis isn't a place for children, move along, this topic has already been extensively discussed several times, in detail
I'd like to see you try
What a strange form of humor
I will ask you this one: can you stop with the World=Planet arguments, since it's quite derailing?World is very vague, so you have to prove and clarify what it actually means otherwise I'll just assume it means planet, after 1000 threads begging for an upgrade I have yet to see a real definition or clarification
If you want to make world = planet, please make a different CRT for it, it is currently accepted information. This thread is for 1-C upgrade of the verse so i kindly ask you to stay on topicWorld is very vague, so you have to prove and clarify what it actually means otherwise I'll just assume it means planet, after 1000 threads begging for an upgrade I have yet to see a real definition or clarification
You seem to have a misunderstanding.World is very vague, so you have to prove and clarify what it actually means otherwise I'll just assume it means planet, after 1000 threads begging for an upgrade I have yet to see a real definition or clarification
I apologies, I’m not physically well rn so it may caused some mood swing@Humanitus_Primevilus888 you were being aggressive with that newest comment of your so sorry i need to delete that post, cool your head down
i promise u, if i do argue anything ur not even gonna respond to it properlyArgue better
son im crine, tryna shift the burden cuz of the gap in reading comprehension. but its whateverprove that only
I gave my part of the bop in the OP so now ur turm ¯\(ツ)/¯
i wonder what "we measure" entails here. now if it wasent obvious, the post ur referencing is referring to time as the dimension we can measure in conventional space time. NOT higher dimensional manifolds. i mean you urself have admitted that its beyond conventional space time so are you tryna backtrack that statement or are you going to contradict urself. and if you somehow need even more than this(which you shouldnt) look at what they say here:It's easy to show that the time we measure is "in a different direction"
In making the definition of a vector space, we generalized the linear structure(addition and scalar multiplication) of 𝐑2 and 𝐑3. We ignored geometric features such as the notions of length and angle. These ideas are embedded in the concept of inner products, which we will investigate in this chapter
Two vectors 𝑢, 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 are called orthogonal if ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ = 0.
Gngi promise u, if i do argue anything ur not even gonna respond to it properly
Doesn't mention conventional space time btw, it's just talking about space over time in general. larp lessi promise u, if i do argue anything ur not even gonna respond to it properly
son im crine, tryna shift the burden cuz of the gap in reading comprehension. but its whatever
lets just read what ur own source says
i wonder what "we measure" entails here. now if it wasent obvious, the post ur referencing is referring to time as the dimension we can measure in conventional space time. NOT higher dimensional manifolds. i mean you urself have admitted that its beyond conventional space time so are you tryna backtrack that statement or are you going to contradict urself.
Unholy larp, nothing here refutes my arguments about space time in general being orthogonalAnd if you somehow need even more than this(which you shouldnt) look at what they say here:
which explains it even more blatantly. for any vector space(real coordinate space) it doesnt have assumed geometric features(orthogonality). rather the geometric features are proven by their inner products(a metric structure) and via physical space time observations. You have basically conceeded the idea that time in the context of the otherworld is like time in a generic space-time contiuum which means that nothing about conventional time is further mapped/assumed when talking about higher dimensional spaces
Says Syn's cousinur lwk just a larp
already addressedDoesn't mention conventional space time btw, it's just talking about space over time in general.
yeah to ur limited understanding.Unholy larp, nothing here refutes my arguments about space time in general being orthogonal
already addressed
if i do argue anything
i already precogged ur response lmfao ur not gonna respond to anything. which is why im also waiting for staff
Anyways jokes aside and yeeting thr goofing around outta the window, imma wait for staff or someone who's actually gonna argue![]()
you have some beef with me or sum?Says Syn's cousin![]()
yuhyou have some beef with me or sum?![]()
Bro do something, we can't allow the power-tripping mass-murdering narcissistic amoral regenerating tyrant named Rimuru to fodderize Goku
i did, im just waiting for adminsBro do something, we can't allow the power-tripping mass-murdering narcissistic amoral regenerating tyrant named Rimuru to fodderize Goku
I believe in feldway Supremacyyou have some beef with me or sum?![]()
You can't bump a CRT unless 12 hours have passed since last postBump cuz i feel like it![]()
SobYou can't bump a CRT unless 12 hours have passed since last post