Beyond the concept of dimensions

Livinaa said:

If the concept in question is Type 2, then transcending beyond the concept of dimensions will only scale to the verse's cosmology. In this case, since in your verse there's only 5 dimensions, then transcending the concept of dimensions will only get you to 6th dimension.

If the concept is Type 1, aka concept that is the very essence of dimension, what it means to be a dimension, to which dimensions depend on it, while the concept itself is independent, then transcending beyond the concept would make you beyond all possible dimensions. It's Low 1-A at minimum.

Click to expand...

Livinaa said:

If the concept in question is Type 2, then transcending beyond the concept of dimensions will only scale to the verse's cosmology. In this case, since in your verse there's only 5 dimensions, then transcending the concept of dimensions will only get you to 6th dimension.

Click to expand...

Ultima_Reality said:

This is incorrect, by the by. Being superior to dimensions will land you at either Low 1-A or 1-A regardless of what "concept type" it is or how many dimensions there are in the verse.

Click to expand...

Ultima_Reality said:

This is incorrect, by the by. Being superior to dimensions will land you at either Low 1-A or 1-A regardless of what "concept type" it is or how many dimensions there are in the verse.

Click to expand...

Rikimarox2 said:

I'd assume that requires a boatload of other evidence? Or are statements like "Superior to the concept of dimensions and is above them" or "Its size became so large that the concept of dimensions/coordinates broke" are more than enough? (The latter is from a novel I read, tell me it qualifies )

Click to expand...

Livinaa said:

So concept type 2, or even 3, of dimension is enough for Low 1-A?

Click to expand...