Beyond the concept of dimensions

[Android303entity]

I have a question that I hope to answer accurately if there is a verse that has 5 dimensions and there is a letter from the same verse that exceeds the concept of dimensions, does it exceed the concept of dimensions completely or will it be 5 dimensions (according to the dimensions in the verses) and why?

 

[TWILIGHT-OP]

English plz

 

[Livinaa]

If the concept in question is Type 2, then transcending beyond the concept of dimensions will only scale to the verse's cosmology. In this case, since in your verse there's only 5 dimensions, then transcending the concept of dimensions will only get you to 6th dimension.

If the concept is Type 1, aka concept that is the very essence of dimension, what it means to be a dimension, to which dimensions depend on it, while the concept itself is independent, then transcending beyond the concept would make you beyond all possible dimensions. It's Low 1-A at minimum.

 

[Grabbing_dragon]

If the concept in question is Type 2, then transcending beyond the concept of dimensions will only scale to the verse's cosmology. In this case, since in your verse there's only 5 dimensions, then transcending the concept of dimensions will only get you to 6th dimension.

If the concept is Type 1, aka concept that is the very essence of dimension, what it means to be a dimension, to which dimensions depend on it, while the concept itself is independent, then transcending beyond the concept would make you beyond all possible dimensions. It's Low 1-A at minimum.

i thought the same but no

 

[Ultima_Reality]

If the concept in question is Type 2, then transcending beyond the concept of dimensions will only scale to the verse's cosmology. In this case, since in your verse there's only 5 dimensions, then transcending the concept of dimensions will only get you to 6th dimension.

This is incorrect, by the by. Being superior to dimensions will land you at either Low 1-A or 1-A regardless of what "concept type" it is or how many dimensions there are in the verse.

 

[Rikimarox2]

This is incorrect, by the by. Being superior to dimensions will land you at either Low 1-A or 1-A regardless of what "concept type" it is or how many dimensions there are in the verse.

I'd assume that requires a boatload of other evidence? Or are statements like "Superior to the concept of dimensions and is above them" or "Its size became so large that the concept of dimensions/coordinates broke" are more than enough? (The latter is from a novel I read, tell me it qualifies )

 

[Livinaa]

This is incorrect, by the by. Being superior to dimensions will land you at either Low 1-A or 1-A regardless of what "concept type" it is or how many dimensions there are in the verse.

So concept type 2, or even 3, of dimension is enough for Low 1-A?

 

[Ultima_Reality]

I'd assume that requires a boatload of other evidence? Or are statements like "Superior to the concept of dimensions and is above them" or "Its size became so large that the concept of dimensions/coordinates broke" are more than enough? (The latter is from a novel I read, tell me it qualifies )

The latter honestly sounds like nonsense but I'd have to review the specific case. The former would suffice, though, yeah.

So concept type 2, or even 3, of dimension is enough for Low 1-A?

Yeah. (Though I'm not sure what a "Type 3 concept of dimension" would even be).

 

[Ioffersomename12]

This is incorrect, by the by. Being superior to dimensions will land you at either Low 1-A or 1-A regardless of what "concept type" it is or how many dimensions there are in the verse.

Hi my friend wants to talk about it but he doesnt have vsbw account so he will gonna write from here

by the way he wants a proper explanation so dont make an bad argument about it and try to answer good please ? ıdk

The concept of dimension is not L1a or 1-A because the concept of dimension is not a physical thing. As long as dimensions are not physical, no tier is given to the person who destroys or transcends it.

 

[SuperNova55555]

The concept of dimension is not L1a or 1-A because the concept of dimension is not a physical thing. As long as dimensions are not physical, no tier is given to the person who destroys or transcends it.

It is a tier beyond them because it destroys something that dimensions ground their existence in. So it would be beyond all particular iterations of dimensions, as all of them equally depend on the concept.

 

[Ioffersomename12]

It is a tier beyond them because it destroys something that dimensions ground their existence in. So it would be beyond all particular iterations of dimensions, as all of them equally depend on the concept.

Isn't the concept of dimension an abstract concept that represents all dimensions? Can something abstract be leveled? As far as I know, it cannot be leveled because in the vsbw system, characters that exceed concrete things, destroy them and do similar things can be leveled. Abstract things are not included in this. If all dimensions were represented by a concrete thing, then it would be L1a or 1-A.

this is his again

 

[SuperNova55555]

Isn't the concept of dimension an abstract concept that represents all dimensions? Can something abstract be leveled? As far as I know, it cannot be leveled because in the vsbw system, characters that exceed concrete things, destroy them and do similar things can be leveled. Abstract things are not included in this. If all dimensions were represented by a concrete thing, then it would be L1a or 1-A.

this is his again

If you destroy the abstract thing, you also indirectly destroy all physical things related to it. So destroying the concept of dimension destroys all physical instances of dimensions, as well. And naturally the abstract concept itself must be tiered higher because it remains detached from the physical things.

In fact, physicality itself ceases at High 1-B, as anything beyond is “too large” to be laid out in intuitive physical spaces and thus only exists in abstract configurations.