• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Speckles the Tarbosaurus High 8-C?

Status
Not open for further replies.
What about "At least Small Building level, possibly Large Building level"? Since the other calc we have is only 9-A, and I don't think Speckles is quite on the level of that giant beast.

Also, rather than endlessly bumping the thread I think you should probably go ask staff members if they could comment here xD
 
What about "At least Small Building level, possibly Large Building level"? Since the other calc we have is only 9-A, and I don't think Speckles is quite on the level of that giant beast.

Also, rather than endlessly bumping the thread I think you should probably go ask staff members if they could comment here xD
Maybe. He was capable of harming it with his bites though. To the point where it squealed out in pain. But I suppose that was just his bites. Speckles did manage to survive attacks from the Beast as did Fang though they were unable to get themselves up for a short while. Speckles’ son also managed to survive a slap from the Beast of Fire Mountain (though was knocked out by the attack) although this could be PIS.

I did contact some staff members a while ago but haven’t got a response yet so I’ll ask some more.
 
Last edited:
What about "At least Small Building level, possibly Large Building level"? Since the other calc we have is only 9-A, and I don't think Speckles is quite on the level of that giant beast.

Also, rather than endlessly bumping the thread I think you should probably go ask staff members if they could comment here xD
Looks good to me.
 
Maybe. He was capable of harming it with his bites though. To the point where it squealed out in pain. But I suppose that was just his bites. Speckles did manage to survive attacks from the Beast as did Fang though they were unable to get themselves up for a short while. Speckles’ son also managed to survive a slap from the Beast of Fire Mountain (though was knocked out by the attack) although this could be PIS.

I did contact some staff members a while ago but haven’t got a response yet so I’ll ask some more.
I just think "At least 9-A, possibly High 8-C" is at a bit safer since Speckles is more relative to One-Eye who performed that Small Building level feat, from what I know the Beast was, at the end of the day, still presented as too colossal a threat for Speckles, who mostly relied on tricks, cunning and dodging to kill it rather than matching it in brute force (but should still somewhat scale by virtue of hurting it).
 
I just think "At least 9-A, possibly High 8-C" is at a bit safer since Speckles is more relative to One-Eye who performed that Small Building level feat, from what I know the Beast was, at the end of the day, still presented as too colossal a threat for Speckles, who mostly relied on tricks, cunning and dodging to kill it rather than matching it in brute force (but should still somewhat scale by virtue of hurting it).
Fair enough. When should I apply the changes? Or are there still not enough votes?
 
I think you might still need a couple more staff members. I'm only a calc guy so my vote wouldn't really count anyway.
 
Just in case you don't go on a bumping streak again, I'd recommend going to the message walls of content mods and stuff to ask what they think of the above suggestion.
I have contacted a few. No response yet. I’ll try and contact more.
 
Tip to the OP, please sanitize your YouTube links when posting them. Here is what I mean. As I have opened it, I will now be receiving your YouTube recommendations for a few months. Let us both hope you aren't an anime guy.

I have seen this movie, and I would agree that Large Building level is a pretty dire stretch for 99% of the cast, and as such will defer to Carioca's position on the subject. I even think Small Building level is probably an overestimation, but this isn't a pursuit I shall be looking into. I do propose a slight wording adjustment, however, with "At least Small Building level, at most Large Building level", as we are talking about the uppermost extremes here (and it's not as though there's much content elsewhere to reckon with).
 
Tip to the OP, please sanitize your YouTube links when posting them. Here is what I mean. As I have opened it, I will now be receiving your YouTube recommendations for a few months. Let us both hope you aren't an anime guy.

I have seen this movie, and I would agree that Large Building level is a pretty dire stretch for 99% of the cast, and as such will defer to Carioca's position on the subject. I even think Small Building level is probably an overestimation, but this isn't a pursuit I shall be looking into. I do propose a slight wording adjustment, however, with "At least Small Building level, at most Large Building level", as we are talking about the uppermost extremes here (and it's not as though there's much content elsewhere to reckon with).
Thank you. Will do so. Also didn’t know about the tracking thing. Sounds kinda scummy on Google’s part.
This all looks good
@Duedate8898 do you agree with the new proposal?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top