• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Mr. Bambu
Reaction score
22,680

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Silence after one message means I missed it; silence after two means "no".
    Hello. Could you evaluate my calculation for me? It's just a strength and speed calc.

    Thank you
    TheAngryOrange
    I wasn't sure where you prefer to take your messages. I hear some ppl prefer to communicate over here but I left a message on the blog as well just in case.

    Alright, I've removed the explosion section and I've put in a source that says EMP move at light speed. How do the calculations look now?
    hey mr. bambu i know a lot of times in fantasy elves tend to be among the prettiest races.


    but


    are there any other races in fiction/fantasy in general

    that are prettier than even elves?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I don't particularly pay much mind to the beauty of races, since my personal choice in aesthetics are more in favor of grim, apocalyptic tones. That said, I do rather like the look of the Dranei from World of Warcraft, so I suppose they'd be my first choice.
    Artorimachi_Meteoraft
    Artorimachi_Meteoraft
    okay thanks


    but what about lore?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Plenty of creatures outshine elves by lore. I'll mostly reference D&D creatures here.

    • Succubi use magic to cheat this, but generally appear as literally the most attractive possible thing to the person viewing them.
    • Ki-rin are so beautiful that people weep tears of joy in their presence. This includes people who have seen the actual gods, including the god of beauty.
    • LeShay are said to be "to elves as elves are to humans".
    • Nymphs and shit tend to rank higher on the wily beautiful fey list than elves.
    • As mentioned above, gods.
    • While it isn't beauty in the same sense, Dragons are typically considered to be more physically attractive than most other creatures (including elves), albeit not in the same way. Mind you, this does not extend to all dragons, but rather true dragons- this excludes things like wyverns and such.
    • Medusae, ironically, were once more beautiful. They made deals with demon lords for temporary, awe-inspiring beauty- what we tend to fight, the creatures that turn people to stone, are the withered-out after effects.
    • Couatl share traits with dragons and ki-rin in that they are considered beautiful beyond compare by a lot of cultures.
    • Certain genies use magic to amplify their beauty to supernatural degrees.
    • Eladrin are a close-relative of elves that are often held in higher regard in this particular area of interest.
    's all I can think of rn, elves in D&D though are fairly common things.
    Hey bambu, i have some questions regarding D&D
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    From a VSBW point of view, a level 17 mage would be Low 7-B. For a general idea of scale, I'll provide you with the list we currently use. I should note that I'm only providing the 5e list since every edition varies a smidgeon due to creatures that have the feats that we scale from shifting around a little in level/CR.

    For all intents and purposes level is considered equal to CR. CR is a measuring stick that equates 4 level 1/2/3/4/etc adventurers with one creature of that CR, and means it is a moderate challenge to that group of adventurers. This is integral to our scaling.

    Levels 1-2: 9-B and Subsonic, scaling to Burning hands (among other 9-B tier feats, obviously, but I'm only going to list the main one, e.g., the highest) for AP and arrow dodging for speed.

    Levels 3-4: 9-B, possibly 9-A scaling to a feat performed by the Rothe, which can shatter stone walls. Their speed remains the same.

    Levels 5-8: 9-A+ and Hypersonic+/High Hypersonic+, scaling to the Conjure Barrage spell, as well as the Call Lightning spell, which is cloud-to-ground lightning that can be dodged.

    Levels 9-10: 8-C, scaling to Cone of Cold, which can freeze tens of creatures solid with a single cast.

    Levels 11-12: High 8-C to 8-A with Relativistic+/FTL, scaling to a number of spells that we couldn't agree on where they land. The light speed stuff comes from an older spell known as Anger of the Noonday Sun, which generates sunlight that you can dodge.

    Levels 13-17: Low 7-B+, scaling to legendary dragons creating terrain effects around their layers (such as earthquakes and storms) at a wide radius.

    Levels 18-24: 6-C+, scaling to the Elemental Lords like Imix and Olhydra. These characters scale to (again) the terrain effects of these lords, which include causing colossal earthquakes, changing the biomes of their homes, and creating massive storms that ragdoll enemies.

    Levels 25-33: Low 6-B+/6-B, scaling to Elder Evils such as the Leviathan and the Hulks of Zoretha. The feat itself is Father Llymic freezing the world, though how this is done is vague- it is either via ******* with the rotation of the earth or downright changing the temperatures to make the entire world into an arctic climate.

    Levels 34-56 (not that this is actually in 5e): High 6-A, scaling to certain powerful creatures such as, notably, the Phaethon and the Murderoid. The former is the reason the cores of worlds are heated, and the latter is, itself, a planet with a diameter of 600 miles at maximum.

    Levels 57+: High 6-A, possibly 2-A, scaling to Hecatoncheires, one of the highest CR creatures ever published. The creature is stated to be able to slaughter pantheons of gods, but it is inconsistent with its ratings so we don't consider this a solid Tier 2 tiersetter.

    Hope this helps.
    TOAAPRESENCE1
    TOAAPRESENCE1
    it does help in terms of VSBW, but i mean more oriented towards the game in general

    so the max would be >57 give or take?

    as for tiers on magic i know that the lower they are the weaker, but i also saw some stuff about how u can put a tier 1 spell on a tier higher and stuff like that?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    The maximum level depends on the edition of the game you're in- not every edition releases "epic level" content because, frankly, it doesn't sell as well. People tend to prefer running lower level stuff. For 3.5e, maximum level was infinite- the highest Challenge Rating creature was 97 or thereabouts. For 5e, maximum level is 20 and the highest CR creatures are all considered 30, even though their strength level at 30 (both in VSBW terms and mechanically, in-game) varies wildly.

    I don't really understand your question about spells. Are you referring to upcasting? (e.g., using higher level spell slots to cast lower level spells with advanced power)
    Think you can take a look at my blog here?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    If I must be honest with you, Joe

    I don't often take up your requests for help because of the hassle in doing so. Not only are the requests often for rather large projects, aid that I do give (be it evaluations for calcs, working on a CRT, and so on) generally end up either ignored by you until others butt in, or just actively fought against or misunderstood. It is a pain to become involved in multiple projects where it seems my input is not actually wanted.

    I wish you luck with your projects.
    Omnificence
    Omnificence
    Okay, thank you anyway.
    Hi mate.

    Can you please evaluate this calc?
    Apex_Predator_GX
    Apex_Predator_GX
    Minor bump
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Hey, I will try to get to this, but I am excessively busy of late. Moreso than usual, that is. Researching for a new page has made it so I must read over a dozen books to prepare. It'll be my 500th page so it is important to me.
    Apex_Predator_GX
    Apex_Predator_GX
    Oh is ok, Understand.

    I'll ask someone else.. thanks anyway.
    Hey I hate to bother you but I know you have helped with Terraria revisions before, and other staff members I've asked for help on my thread haven't responded, so could you take a look at this thread I made. If not that's perfectly fine.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I'll take a look at this later, sure.
    Hi! So, as you worked with the destruction value chart, I'd like to ask your input on this:
    I have a question regarding your Great Serpent Calc, how is not considered calc stacking? Not disputing its validity but is it because you used framechecks for the speed + mass?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    What about it makes it seem like calc stacking to you? I use no prior calc to get the speed, rather I simply garner the speed of the serpent as it appears in game. So, for example, it would be calc stacking to say "I have calculated the character's movement compared to the lightning of the divine dragon, let's use this to get KE".
    Naito-desu
    Naito-desu
    Ah alright, I see. I assumed the framechecking of Great Serpent's speed to be a calc of its own, hence why I wanted clarification. Thanks!
    Yo, a question. What does the inverted moon icon above your profile photo mean?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I didn't make my pfp, it actually comes from a not-very-well-known tabletop game called "MORK BORG". The upside down crescent moon is indicative of life and death, however I don't know if that's what the creators intended (though I assume it is, given that's very on-brand for MORK BORG).
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I will do so.
    LIFE_OF_KING
    LIFE_OF_KING
    There are 38 bombs in the scene, however I am only calculating the part for pulverizing the steel floor (which in total has 3.5 bombs). I didn't calculate the whole thing because the bombs are the same but the materials are different, which would make the damage distribution vary, so for simplicity I calculated the part that affects the strongest material

    monster ear height is 20.7825 meters and there are 36 pixels
    1 pixel = 0.57729166666
    the total pixels contained in the explosion is 264 blast width is 152,405 m
    ((x/0.28)^3)/1000 =((0,152404/0.28)^3)/1000 = 0.00016125567 megaton / 161.25567 Ton
    Could you please evaluate if there is something wrong?
    do you know how to calculate the volume of this cloud?



    So do I have to use Condensation Value = Water Mass x Latent Heat of Vaporization of Water to find out the joules?
    I have calculated the area of the waterpark island, although I still doubt it is 600 - 700 meters
    Omnificence
    Omnificence
    Thank you, and thank you for your feedback. Do you also know the proper way to calculate speed so I can revise the blog?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I don't think we have a standard for that outside of the speeds listed on the large size thread. Otherwise it's just vaguely higher, or based on feats performed when they're larger.
    Omnificence
    Omnificence
    Then how do I properly calculate the AP the same way Therefir did it?
    Are you able to list off a few people on this wiki that you know are knowledgeable on SAO?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I know Problemexe did do it, DMUA is the main staff member associated with it but I think he's distanced himself from it. There's some Youtuber iirc that works on it, I don't recall their forum name at the moment.
    Heyo question out of curiosity, do we have a formula for calculations that deal with destruction on a macro quantum level? I know that we do for Sub Atomic destruction but for a feat I wanna tackle the character's are Manipulating electrons which is Macro Quantum rather than Sub Atomic.


    Now would I substitute it for Sub Atomic destruction for the time being? I myself have never seen any calcs with macro quantum destruction so I'm a bit confused on what to do here.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I don't know if we have anything for that, no. I don't know if sub-atomic would be accurate.
    LordGinSama
    LordGinSama
    That seems like the only solution, or should I make a CRT in the calc group discussion thread so we can attempt to find a formula? I agree using sub atomic as a low ball isn't right tbh.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I'd ask one of the more savy calc group members. Dunno how much of the lore you know, but I mostly learned what I know by reading VSBW calcs and online articles. Try speaking to DontTalk first, then make a thread about pursuing a method if that doesn't pan out. Worse comes to worst sub atomic is there, I suppose.
    I know that you couldn't care less about KH and all, but from your complaints over the series on your part, I'd like to ask you something...

    Did you at least play past the "tutorial" section? KHII is by many claimed to be the best KH game to this day, and while the Roxas segment can be somewhat alienizing for first-time players, what comes after it may be more up to your taste.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I didn't play Kingdom Hearts II, though I did watch my sister play it. I recall assisting her with the Lion King section as she had trouble with it.

    There are no redeeming qualities about Kingdom Hearts. At best you can consider it a competent leech of story aspects and game mechanics taken from better games. Cheers.
    Bobsican
    Bobsican
    BTW, to avoid your reply being left in hiatus over the CRT, can you please at least say something?
    Thanks for the reply in any case.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I was out all day, Bob. I don't live on the wiki, much less on Kingdom Hearts threads.
    Hey, Zullie the Witch dropped a new datamine video so I wonder if the size specification of the Divine Dragon might change things
    unknown.png
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    That doesn't bring him to a new size bracket, no. Type 2 is 100 meters to 1 kilometer.
    Naito-desu
    Naito-desu
    Do you think it may affect the size of the sword it's wielding?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Unlikely, since we don't ever see the Dragon's full body in a straight line.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top